|
'twould seem to me it is getting a process name, System Idle Process, shows up as just 'idle'
I don't know why, i also don't know why every process would have this name... hmm
Okay, now its wierd, i copy your code, and implement it, the first 4 processes all come up right, then all others list as Idle...
And now all list as Idle
-- modified at 20:14 Wednesday 18th October, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Boo-ya! >_<
I tried it with just invoke (not begininvoke) and it works fine, so i think, hmm perhaps we need EndInvoke (well, it would make sense)
so you need to do it like this:
IAsyncResult AR = ProcessList.BeginInvoke((MethodInvoker)delegate<br />
{<br />
ProcessList.Items.Add(DisplayProcess.ProcessName);<br />
});<br />
<br />
ProcessList.EndInvoke(AR)
Well, my lame theory is:
Since you don't end the invoke, it just the listbox (or listview) just keeps updating with the last thing that was sent by ProcessList.BeginInvoke - which would be the process 'Idle' (previously noted as being 'System Idle Process')
|
|
|
|
|
Ok that makes sense. I was under the assumption that once the code block for the delegate executed that the BeginInvoke would terminate itself. Seems like common sense, but then again there must be another reason behind it all.
|
|
|
|
|
v9ExportPacket p = new v9ExportPacket();
p.TemplateRecord = new TemplateRecord[5];
TemplateRecord t_tmp = new TemplateRecord();
t_tmp.FlowSetID=0;
t_tmp.Length=10;
t_tmp.id=23;
t_tmp.FieldCount=4;
t_tmp.Fields= new FieldPairs[t_tmp.FieldCount];
t_tmp.Fields[0] = new FieldPairs(1,2);
t_tmp.Fields[1] = new FieldPairs(3,4);
t_tmp.Fields[2] = new FieldPairs(5,6);
t_tmp.Fields[3] = new FieldPairs(7,8);
p.TemplateRecord[0] = t_tmp;
i was wondering if there is a way that i could just use
p.TemplateRecord[0].id=1;
instead of having to create a TemplateRecord object t_tmp to set the properties of that class and then set the TemplateRecord[0] property object equal to t_tmp object. i have looked into using indexers but i haven't seen an example where you could access a property of an indexed property.
|
|
|
|
|
If you create an indexer and the object is a class, it's passed by reference, so you can automatically alter indexed properties.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Okay so let me see if i understand you correctly. I have two classes. Class A and Class B. I give class A 5 properties
int prop1(){}
int prop2(){}
int prop3(){}
int prop4(){}
classB prop5(){}
what i would like to do is to create a 5th property and make its type equal to ClassB. but i would also like to index this property too. BTW Class B also has some properties to it. So in the end i would be able to access my items like this:
classA xyz = new classA();
xyz.prop1=1;
xyz.prop2=2;
xyz.prop3=3;
xyz.prop4=4;
xyz.prop5[0].prop1=1;
xyz.prop5[0].prop2=2;
xyz.prop5[1].prop1=1;
xyz.prop5[1].prop2=2;
I remember doing stuff like this a while ago in VB6 but i'm pretty new to C# and i'm just learning out to do this sort of stuff. I hope that explain helps a little bit more. I think i understand what your saying though.
|
|
|
|
|
Not really clear on what you're trying to do, but I'll take a stab at it.
The important thing to remember when trying to access an index is what is it returning me?
For instance, take a DataSet.
DataSet ds;
DataTable dt = ds.Tables[0];
DataRow dr = ds.Tables[0].Rows[0];
object o = ds.Tables[0].Rows[0][0];
So, you can continue to index off a property, as long as that property contains an index operation. For your case, you might need to create a 'Collection' class that simply holds a collection of items for you. Assuming I'm even close on what you're asking a question about. 
Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
hey thanks for the reply. yea sorry i wasn't too clear as it was a post right as i was leaving work today. i think i understand what you mean and i will give it a try! thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have problem in graphics
in this code no compiletime error occurs.
private void Lines(System.Windows.Forms.PaintEventArgs e)<br />
{<br />
Graphics g = e.Graphics;<br />
Pen pen = new Pen(Color.Red,4);<br />
g.DrawLines(pen,10,10,25,25); <br />
}
But when i call this method with Onclick event of a button this error occurs in runtime:
"Object refrence not set a instance of an object."
and when i want to use his code
Graphics g = new Graphics();
this error occurs :
No overloaded method 'Graphics' takes '0' arguments
I want to call a method and paint some lines in my form but i dont want to override OnPaint method of form
like this :
protected override void OnPaint(<br />
PaintEventArgs paintEvent )<br />
<br />
{<br />
Graphics g = paintEvent.Graphics;<br />
Pen pen = new Pen(Color.Red,4);<br />
g.DrawLines(pen,10,10,25,25); <br />
}
How i can do this ?
---------------------
Areff Bahrami(KAVEH)
Areff.HB@Gmail.com
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Areff wrote: I want to call a method and paint some lines in my form but i dont want to override OnPaint method of form
That's the problem. You want to do it all wrong. You're getting that error as you're passing null as the argument, or you're passing a PaintEventArgs that doesn't contain a Graphics object. Either way, not overriding the paint method means you want to write bad code that won't work properly. Why would you want to do that ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
with .Net
---------------------
Areff Bahrami(KAVEH)
Areff.HB@Gmail.com
---------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you mean by that. Using C# means you'll be using .NET. That doesn't change what I said.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: not overriding the paint method means you want to write bad code that won't work properly
I always use the Graphics.FromHandle function to get the Graphics object, why should this be bad code?
|
|
|
|
|
You can get a Graphics object from a windows (or control) handle.
I think the syntax is: Graphics.FromHandle(...);
Pass it a handle from a panel or button, or whatever tot draw on that control...
Hope this helps...
|
|
|
|
|
Use
Graphics g = this.CreateGraphics() in your constructor, and declare g as a class member so you can use it elsewhere. I've used this approach a few times to support custom double buffering on a control. If you want your control to display everything flickerfree you should implement this too (draw into a bitmap and flip it over to your graphics now and then), this can be handy for controls that need a high refresh rate (30fps). If you're not doing that, use OnPaint().
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
What can i do if an ObjectDisposedException ocures?
I have 2 forms, 1 is calling 2. If i close 2 and restart it again from form1 i get that Exception.
I want to be able to restart the form2 again through from1.
This exception is pointing to the line which starts with:
Show();
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
You have disposed of the form, you need to create a new instance of form2, as in use new to reassign the variable, or change the code so it does not get disposed.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
That worked, thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Use the Hide method instead of Close, if you intend to reuse it.
--------
"I say no to drugs, but they don't listen."
- Marilyn Manson
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand why anyone would intentionally use a partial class. Keep in mind I'm a C++ programmer who occasionally has to work on .Net crap.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
It's used primarily for:
1) Breaking up large class files to allow parallel development, which might be otherwise prevented in a single file.
2) Splitting up designer code from user code to allow MS to modify its code without disturbing yours (and visa versa).
And I would hardly think .NET is crap...since C++ is just the predecessor of C#.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Rissing wrote: since C++ is just the predecessor of C#.
Rubbish. C# is based on Java. It, like Java, has C++ like syntax to try and get C++ programmers to use it, but they are chalk and cheese.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I don't disagree that C# and Java are similiar, but C# is more like the marriage of C++ and Java.
Personally, a language is a language is a language. If it gets you to what you want with the least amount of pain/effort all the better. They're all just appropriate tools for certain tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Rissing wrote: but C# is more like the marriage of C++ and Java.
How ?
Andrew Rissing wrote: If it gets you to what you want with the least amount of pain/effort all the better. They're all just appropriate tools for certain tasks.
I don't disagree, I use C++ and C# equally, and am happy with both. But, C# is *not* an evolution of C++, it's very different.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
C# is C++ style with Java's managed environment (if you consider Java being the 'originator' of such).
And yes, C# is very different from C++. It was from the ground up a new language (compiler/design/etc.). But the point was merely that many of the constructs/ideas from C++ found their way into C#. They designed C# to be a natural transition for C/C++ programers into the managed world. Hence, why I said it was predecessor.
I just think it was funny for someone who's a C++ programmer to knock C# because of what it was partly designed off of.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
