|
As you mentioned, it depends on the path the storm eventually takes. I was living in Arlington attending high school when Tropical Storm Frances hit in '98. We got some serious flash floods, 4-6 inches deep pretty much everywhere. The high clay content in the ground around DFW can be problematic.
Even if the storm does turn, he will still probably see some rain. Only advice I've got is "Don't be stupid."
Seen a lot of people assume the innocent looking shallow puddle was safe only to flood their car because the road dips or worse washed out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cue Tommy Shannons great walking line.;)
|
|
|
|
|
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
"It's Floodin' down in Texas"
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: that's like 12 KM or something
 I think it is very more "something"
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
But look at the bright side--if that's what's happening next week, then we can stop worrying about any claimed long-term sea level rise.
|
|
|
|
|
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SerenityNowDev wrote: that's like 12 KM or something
That's like 12 kilometers??! 
I think you mean it's about a meter.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you suggesting I was off a bit?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: I guess some folks around here just don't get your sense of humour
It is very dry, no pun intended. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Recently Microsoft released .net core, is it useful for desktop application?
|
|
|
|
|
This looks like a question that is best asked in Q&A - Here in the Lounge we don't know much about that... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Look a few threads back. They found him, fed him and took him in. Now you guys have to take care of him, walk him at least three times a day. That will teach you responsibility. 
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: Here in the Lounge we don't know much about that anything
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are worthy, yes.
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it. A few hundred years later another traveler despairing as myself, may mourn the disappearance of what I may have seen, but failed to see.» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
So, I am building Ver II of something I made, with, after enough use, points out how it could be better (and importantly, easier to teach others to use). A generic Reports Generator: input screen.
On change was that I was going to use AJAX to load the main section of the page instead of a location.assign() to the page with the parameter add so it renders with the main section.
Alas, I was using a javaScript calendar control to make those cute little date-picker calendars and the AJAX rendering was just an empty text input field. No calendar. No nothing. Hours of looking for work-arounds (and confirming it was only the AJAX rendered controls), I ended up just redrawing the page. It just wasn't worthwhile to do otherwise.
For those interested, my gaze is mostly towards the floor. It may be a cleaner, nicer, more developer friendly version, automatically extensible without coding (or very little for crazy stuff) - but I still nee to re-invoke the entire page.
I've even considered that if I retrofit the original version I can maintain 100% backward compatibility with the existing without extra coding. Sulk Sulk Sulk.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
That's web programming for you. One step forward, two steps backwards. 
|
|
|
|
|
I had to reinstall windows this week, and during the process of figuring out which button takes you to BIOS, my finger slipped and smashed the keyboard twice, then picked it up and slammed it into the desk. Turns out it was a USB keyboard, which the 'older' mobo ignores until after the OS loads. Talk about laugh.
Anyway, I collected the buttons, because I would hate to lose Ctrl, and I'm rather fond of Esc as well. Now I'm looking for a code snippet that can be 'hard-coded' using the standard buttons on a single keyboard. The [Insert] & [Delete] buttons are low hanging fruit, but possibly lack finesse? Also the space bar didn't make it.
I was thinking of xkcd: Exploits of a Mom[^, specifically: Robert'); DROP TABLE [Students]; --
The core 'DROP TABLE' contains no repeats, and I imagine Randall wouldn't be absolutely crushed if we changed Robert and Students, but we only have one [;] and one [-]. Most other SQL is going to run out of ['] too.
Now I'm working on double entendres using [Insert] [End], and thinking about all of the keyboards I've thrown away :'(
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm so making a necklace out of Ctrl-Alt-Delete.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
