|
A (rather poor) question in QA asked about Google Polymer[^]. It actually looks very cool.
Anyone here use it?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for posting this.
This is one solid reason to visit the Lounge everyday - instant update on Technology.
Would have perhaps taken months via other routes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hoosier Lottery offers chance to win 20 years of bacon[^]
Granted, it's $250 a year of bacon, so it's really only 20 days supply (for some around here).
(Apologies if I offended anyone from Indiana - I was only there once for a week, and all I remember is that there were no sidewalks, and I hurt someone's feelings by telling them the 'difference between Canadians and Americans')
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I hurt someone's feelings by telling them the 'difference between Canadians and Americans
Which is?
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
|
|
|
|
|
"An American is someone who is proud to be an American, while a Canadian is one who is proud they are not."
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Good one 
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
|
|
|
|
|
Huh? How much bacon do you eat?
Thinking to become veg-whatever if I'd to afford a similar amount/month!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish to serve under them.
Much less will I ever install an interface directly into my head for them. For those who now have to carry their pacemakers in their hands this might be more acceptable.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Back in the early 80's when I was going to a community college they had a DEC PDP-11/34a minicomputer system running RSTS in the computer lab. Every once in a while it would have swap errors and send out a message stating "Disk error during swap, program lost, sorry." Our ongoing joke was to say "Disk error during swap, brain lost, sorry." Somehow the idea of directly augmenting our brains with computers just doesn't sound like a real good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I am already there! I have a cochlear implant, feeds directly to my brain via the auditory nerve. They now have brain stem implants too.
I am up sh#t creek if I get hacked 
|
|
|
|
|
Ha! We had one of those, too... and it, also, did that... memories...
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose it's better than getting drunk deciding you want to make some prints of your backside and mistaking the photocopier from the laminator. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
Someone here had a similar signature at one time...used to always make me laugh. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
WE ARE DYSLEXIC OF BORG. Refutance is systile. Your a$$ will be laminated.
Psychosis at 10
Film at 11
Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it.
Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep! That's the one! Thanks! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
So I won't know whether my girlfriend broke up because of me or if if because she was hacked. Great.
|
|
|
|
|
Uncle Ray (tm) is a strange creature: every time I think he's insane, he comes up with something I've been thinking about, too, at which point I realize that either he's not insane at all, or that I'm completely nuts. Recently, I've been leaning toward the latter...
...but in any event, this is something I've been thinking about as well, vis-à-vis Sutton's Zeroth Law of Population Growth: "As the population of the world increases, the sum of its IQ remains a constant."
Have you noticed how stupid young people are these days? They have in front of them a computer with a search engine on it, not to mention Wikipedia, and they have instant access to the sum total of human knowledge -- and they know absolutely nothing. Why? I finally realized that the one implies the other: if they need to know a thing for some reason, they can grab the information off the internet, use it once and forget it. When we were kids, we had to go to the library to get the information, and then, quite possibly, the book we needed would be out, so we had to wait around, or try to get it somewhere else... actually make an effort. And when we got the book, the information we wanted would be bracketed by other information which (the book having no search function) we were also obliged to read: the information, in other words, was in context and made sense - and thus we remembered it. But search-engine-supplied information, and Wikipedia-supplied information, is utterly a-priori: it's almost as though it were designed to be a single-serving piece of data which can be deleted and forgotten about after use.
I think, though, that the human race is currently in an interstitial phase of development: we have access to all information, all the time, but it's still externalized to a great extent, in that we have to use a device to look it up. Eventually, though, Uncle Ray will be proven right, and we will be wet-wired into all of it, and it will appear to us as an extension of our own thoughts (my own impression of it is that it would be something like the mini-thinker that a character in Greg Bear's "Moving Mars" has implanted in her head to help with physics problems: she leans against a wall and finds herself thinking about lines of force and so forth).
So, in that scenario, what does "intelligence" mean? Clearly, intelligence will no longer be indicated by the breadth of a person's knowledge: after all, Wikipedia knows a lot, but it's not intelligent. One definition of intelligence is that it has less to do with what you know and more to do with how you use it. For example, knowing two things, can you extrapolate a third? Can you then extrapolate a fourth based on those three? You'd be amazed how many people can't. Can you know when your extrapolation starts to veer into fantasy?
I also think that a new manifestation of intelligence will emerge: if you have access to the sum total of human knowledge, all the time, your main problem will be to organize it so that it's useful: to prioritize and categorize and search it, otherwise even the simplest searches will either take you years or will have you spouting nonsense. If the relevance of one item of knowledge to another (in a human brain) can be indicated by the number of neuronal connections between the cells remembering them, and the distance of those connections (and I think it probably can: the human brain learns by growing new connections to link data) then our task will either be to impose that structure personally upon the data to which we're now connected, or, preferably, to take a gestalt view of the way anyone out there already connects any two items, and to replicate that structure in the internet so that the whole thing works like the connections in the brain.
Without something like that in place, I can only assume that everyone connected to such a system will instantly go insane...
|
|
|
|
|
I will make a prediction - that will not happen. Certainly won't happen by 2030.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been at my new job for a month now. I'm working through a recruiter for the first 3 months.
The recruiter's accounting department just accidentally CC'd me on an invoice to the company's accounting department here with a copy of their invoice.
Now that I know how much the company is REALLY paying... I can't wait to negotiate when I go full time.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you should CC to us(CPian) too. It might help for future
|
|
|
|
|
Might not be an accident.
|
|
|
|
|
Do not forget that if the recruiter company is paying the employee tax and benefits the amount will be much hire. When a company I worked for would bid a project they would bid you at three times your hourly amount to cover everything.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
