|
Hi all,
I am using iis 5.1 and my application is in two part one is in asp.net net and another one is asp.net + ASP. My first application is woking fine but when i am calling the asp page then getting the server application error 404 . I try to debug the code then getting this exception .
system.platformnotsupported exception and "This operation requires IIS integrated pipeline mode".
Please help me out. its very urgent i am working with this error since one week.
Thanks with regards,
Jitendra
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jitendra,
If you are using Server.TransferRequest this cannot be used on any versions of IIS below version 7. If you are then this is the error you will get.
Please post the code that you are using when you receive the error.
Regards
Julian Mummery
Please Visit my FREE Bug / Fault Logging Website at FaultLogger.com
|
|
|
|
|
i am using the same code for calling the .aspx page but when i am trying to call those aspx page which having the asp file call those are not working.
please let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Please confirm, are you using Server.Transfer? yes or no.
Regards
Julian Mummery
Please Visit my FREE Bug / Fault Logging Website at FaultLogger.com
|
|
|
|
|
no i am not using server.transfer
this is my code
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.NoCache);
if (HttpContext.Current.Items[Constant.Authorization] == null ||
!(bool)HttpContext.Current.Items[Constant.Authorization]) Response.Redirect(Constant.AccessRequestPage);
|
|
|
|
|
How are you calling your asp pages? Asp and asp.net run on different engines. you can not directly interact between them. You can redirect calls from one to another. If you show us how you doing it, it will give us some clue as to what you trying to do.
I have asp + asp.net running side by side. I interact between them, when I move from one to the other, I save my session state to db then call
Request.Redirect("somepage.aspx?someparameter) (I call both somepage.asp and somepage.aspx the same way)
then on the other side I load my session state read what I need to get and continue doing what I need to do.
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
my applicaion is running and working fine on microsoft server 2003 that is the dev,qa server . but my desktop having xp and IIS 5.1 so is it require any setting in iis for executing the ASP pages because only asp pages are not runing in my application.
Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
Its because Only IIS7 supports the integrated pipeline. you cannot run this on IIS 5.1
Regards
Julian Mummery
Please Visit my FREE Bug / Fault Logging Website at FaultLogger.com
|
|
|
|
|
my applicaion is running and working fine on microsoft server 2003 that is the dev,qa server . but my desktop having xp and IIS 5.1 so is it require any setting in iis for executing the ASP pages because only asp pages are not runing in my application.
Please suggest me what i need to do.
thanks.....
|
|
|
|
|
on your xp desktop, try the following:
1. Disable IE show friendly error messages from the advanced page
2. Open IE and type the following http:\\localhost\
this should redirect you to http://localhost/localstart.asp. If you see the page ok, then asp is running on your xp, if not what error message do you see. that should give you some clue.
If you see http:\\localhost ok, then make sure your asp program is installed properly in your xp machine. make sure any COM objects it uses are configured and registered properly.
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
HI,
i am created one test solution for checking purpose whether asp is working or not . I am getting this error in test application
Server Error in '/WebSite1' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This type of page is not served.
Description: The type of page you have requested is not served because it has been explicitly forbidden. The extension '.asp' may be incorrect. Please review the URL below and make sure that it is spelled correctly.
Requested URL: /WebSite1/Default2.asp
|
|
|
|
|
|
then you need to configure IIS to serve asp pages see here for details[^]
Make sure 'Active Server Pages' are allowed, see the picture.
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Yusuf,
Actually my IIS dont have these option "Application pools" and "Service web extentions" .
please see your link which you sent me.
what i need to do ...
|
|
|
|
|
read the whole article. There is more than the picture in it. There are plenty of other resources on that page.
Yusuf
|
|
|
|
|
Yusuf wrote: There is more than the picture in it.
Lol, beautiful!
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
I have an ASP Login control contained in a UpdatePanel. What I need to do is call a javascript function when the Login control's onauthenticate event is fired. I tried adding the following to the Login control definition:
onauthenticate="authenticate(this, e)"
The problem is that when I try to run the application I receive an error that argument e is undefined in the current context. How can I do this?
Thanks,
Steve
modified on Thursday, March 5, 2009 5:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Define 'e'.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
I was not quite sure what you were suggesting when you replied for me to define e. I think that my initial question was not worded correctly. I just wanted to know if anyone know what the parameter for the ASP Login control onauthenticate="authenticate(this, ?)" would be if authenticate was a javascript function? I know that code behind event args are of type AuthenticateEventArgs but how would this be indicated in the javascript Login control onauthenticate definition?
Thanks,
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
I have created a web service, and a coworker has created an installation package for it using InstallShield.
I have just realized that I forgot to change the Web.config file to set debug to false before he made the installation package. It is currently set to
compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="true"/
My question is, if I manually edit the Web.config file for this web service to set it to the following value after it has already been deployed, will it still execute with all the debugging overhead and resources?
compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="false"/
Do I have to bother my coworker to put another build together after I change the Web.config file?
Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
No, the point of config files is that you can deploy an exe and change things about it, by just changing the config file. The exe reads the config files.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick response.
|
|
|
|
|
I have use following code for reading value of textbox from gridview,but it could not give any value.it just show null value....Pls Help Me...
protected void GridView1_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow)
{
Button l = (Button)e.Row.FindControl("Button1");
if (l != null)
{
TextBox t = (TextBox)e.Row.FindControl("txt_choose");
string vc = t.Text;
}
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you need to tell us which line fails and show us the ASPX as well.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I have a department and an employee table. I populated a radio button list with all the department codes.
By default a Gridview will display all employee record. And, when I will select one department code on the radio button list, the GridView will only display employee record(s) with the same department code(s).
This is working fine with the ff:
protected void radioButtonList1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SqlDataSource2.SelectParameters.Add("deptCode", radioButtonList1.SelectedValue);
SqlDataSource2.SelectCommand = "SELECT [iD], [firstName], [lastName], [dateOfBirth], [deptCode][position] FROM [F201] WHERE ([deptCode] = @deptCode)";
}
But, I think that, when there will be to many employee records, this will slow the loading. Is there any other way to display these record to a Gridview without re-querying to the table?
I am new to Asp.Net, any suggestion will be very much appreciated.
|
|
|
|