|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the update of the design, the "updated" date isn't shown anymore on article pages (The "posted" date ist still there.)
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Only articles that have been updated have an "updated" date.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Makes sense  I checked only two or three articles, and apparently they all were new ones 
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Are they still in the plans?
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda.
I wish I could be more specific.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose there's a lot of considerations to be made for such a feature. After all, we really don't need 3431 different snippets on how ::CreateFile() works.
How about a Wiki, with predefined sections and subsections? I for one would love that.
--
Larva-Tested, Pupa-Approved
|
|
|
|
|
move the LHS skyscraper ad to the RHS.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a sticky thread in the Lounge about the site changes. It might stop the tens of threads that are being started on the subject,
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
No, it would just flood all the other lounge threads down to page 9 after a day or two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael wanted a sticky thread, not a sticky message. 
--
Presented in BC [Brain Control] where available
|
|
|
|
|
A colleague of mine mentioned today that having discussions/blogging/etc can be harmful when it comes time to get a new job, because HR people search for you online to see what your personal views are. They can then silently use that information against you, "Sorry, the position has been filled (...and you're a liberal hipster with a pet cobra)."
What better place to look up how someone thinks about a wide range of topics than to go to that person's CP profile and view their message history log! I think that the message log should be restricted to CP members only. At least that would make it more of an effort for some HR person to snoop around. Perhaps there could also be a constraint, such as, you can't view a message log until you've been a member for a day or week.
What do you think?
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
No way. I firmly believe if you're going to post something in a public forum you should be willing to stand by it. Too many times people assume they are anonymous or not subject to social niceties simply because they are on the other end of an ethernet cable. I'm very much against absolving people of responsibility for their own actions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm very much against absolving people of responsibility for their own actions.
That wasn't my objective, really. I agree that people shouldn't feel free to go around posting that people are a-holes and c-suckers. I am more concerned with an innocent statement such as "I think the war with Iraq is unnecessary." Political views like that are the type of thing that an HR person can use to filter out resumes, based on his/her personal views. There's no need to be absolved of a statement like that, it's just an opinion.
But, in the end, it's your site, so, whatever.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Smith wrote:
What do you think?
If you don't want somebody to read it, then don't post it on the internet. I actually like that potential employeers can read what I write here at CP. Anybody who doesn't want to hire me because of my views isn't the kind of person I want to work for anyway.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote: Anybody who doesn't want to hire me because of my views isn't the kind of person I want to work for anyway.
When interviewing at a small company I agree with that. But when interviewing at a large company that idea doesn't pan out because the person who is filtering resumes has nothing to do with the job for which a developer applies. The HR people are the ones I'm concerned about, not the dev managers. What if they see that candidate X is "against Bush" or whatever and, out of personal spite, throw away his resume? Just a thought.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
One could use a pen name; most of CPians have been doing so.
Best,
Jun
|
|
|
|
|
Jun Du wrote: One could use a pen name; most of CPians have been doing so.
Good point. It's too late for me now, though (not that I'm particularly offensive or opinionated). The idea of my posts being viewed by HR people really shook me up. It's probably not a big deal unless you say lots of offensive things. I hope.
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Do you ever ego search[^]? That's a great way to see what the world thinks of you 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Huh... Apparently you're quote worthy!
(and also edited a book of classic Christian texts  )
|
|
|
|
|
The world seems to think that I'm a professional basketball player. Hmm, that's odd, I'm actually a consultant. I wonder what gave them that idea...
:josh:
My WPF Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Josh Smith wrote: It's too late for me now
Naw, just find someone else with your name and claim up and down it was them...
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
Good idea!