|
I have deleted a bookmark for my own article and got -7 points because of that 
29 Jan 2011 20:04 PM Article is bookmarked (undo) Author Article INI Files -5
29 Jan 2011 20:04 PM Bookmarked an object (undo) Organiser Article INI Files -2
29 Jan 2011 18:35 PM Sign in Participant Member 1
29 Jan 2011 17:10 PM General Forum Message Upvoted Debator Forum Message System.Windows.Shell namespace 6
28 Jan 2011 13:17 PM Post a General Forum Message Debator Forum Message Re: '=' Character 1
28 Jan 2011 12:57 PM Post a General Forum Message Debator Forum Message Re: '=' Character 1
Note: I did not get +5+2 before.
PS. I bookmarked and un-bookmarked it just for the sake of curiosity if something evil happens. 
Greetings - Jacek
modified on Saturday, January 29, 2011 6:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Thats correct.
You get 2 rep points for bookmarking an item. The author of an item gets 5. As you were the author, you get 5+2 = 7
Then you undid the book mark, so -2 marks for removing the bookmark, and -5 for having a bookmark removed from your article.
All correct!
|
|
|
|
|
No, because I did NOT get 5+2 points, just -5 and -2.
More history:
29 Jan 2011 20:04 PM Article is bookmarked (undo) Author Article INI Files -5
29 Jan 2011 20:04 PM Bookmarked an object (undo) Organiser Article INI Files -2
29 Jan 2011 18:35 PM Sign in Participant Member 1
29 Jan 2011 17:10 PM General Forum Message Upvoted Debator Forum Message System.Windows.Shell namespace 6
28 Jan 2011 13:17 PM Post a General Forum Message Debator Forum Message Re: '=' Character 1
28 Jan 2011 12:57 PM Post a General Forum Message Debator Forum Message Re: '=' Character 1
Neither 5 nor 2 appears.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
How long did you wait between bookmarking and unbookmarking?
How about trying, bookmark again, wait till it appears on your rep list, and then unbookmark, and wait for that to appear.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: How long did you wait between bookmarking and unbookmarking?
About 20 seconds
DaveAuld wrote: How about trying, bookmark again, wait till it appears on your rep list, and then unbookmark, and wait for that to appear.
OK, gonna try
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
I have an impression that bookmarking an article by it's owner does not change rep by design. However, un-bookmaring does and this is the buggy point.
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think i will try in that case....... 
|
|
|
|
|
I wanna my 7 points baaaa-aaack wooooo bhuuu bhuu bhu  
Greetings - Jacek
|
|
|
|
|
I empathize with you, losing points is such sorrow +5
If you can read this, you don't have Papyrus installed
|
|
|
|
|
That shouldn't matter - both actions should show up in the Recent Reputation Points list.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
If I reply to my message by left clicking the reply button I get a warning about replying to my own message. If I middle click to reply in a new tab I get no warning.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: If I middle click to reply in a new tab I get no warning.
Also, if I right click the reply link and say open in a new tab, there is no warning.
|
|
|
|
|
The site assumes that anyone advanced enough to click one of the other mouse buttons doesn't need a warning.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is happening in FF3.6.13, it's not just an IE problem.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
If I Ctrl+click in FireFox it works, but if I right clcik and select "open in new tab" there is no warning. I suspect that the mapping of the middle button to "open in tab" is opening the reply page in a new tab using the second, not first, method, meaning no click is being generated and there's nothing for us to grab on to.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So is there any point in refiling my bug report with mozilla?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I can't answer that one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
I'll show you an example for this by below message.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
Double new lines between Quote & message.
thatraja wrote: In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
Single new line between Quote & message.
I hope this will help you. Also notice this message height, here I have taken only 2 Quotes, just think if our people take around 5-10 quotes...that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: Double new lines between Quote & message
And this has now been fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, seen that too.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
I used the strikeout tag on some code I posted here:
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/151375/Input-field-clear.aspx[^]
Notice that the code block collapse link is also struck out (but it still appears to function as expected).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified on Friday, January 28, 2011 1:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
The link tags seem not to be working for you either. 
|
|
|
|
|
Happy now?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
