|
Dan Neely wrote: If I middle click to reply in a new tab I get no warning.
Also, if I right click the reply link and say open in a new tab, there is no warning.
|
|
|
|
|
The site assumes that anyone advanced enough to click one of the other mouse buttons doesn't need a warning.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is happening in FF3.6.13, it's not just an IE problem.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
If I Ctrl+click in FireFox it works, but if I right clcik and select "open in new tab" there is no warning. I suspect that the mapping of the middle button to "open in tab" is opening the reply page in a new tab using the second, not first, method, meaning no click is being generated and there's nothing for us to grab on to.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So is there any point in refiling my bug report with mozilla?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I can't answer that one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
I'll show you an example for this by below message.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
Double new lines between Quote & message.
thatraja wrote: In preview/output, It generates double new lines between 'Quote text' and message. I think here one new line will be fine because when we take many quotes in a message, the message height is very high by the double new lines.
Single new line between Quote & message.
I hope this will help you. Also notice this message height, here I have taken only 2 Quotes, just think if our people take around 5-10 quotes...that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: Double new lines between Quote & message
And this has now been fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, seen that too.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
I used the strikeout tag on some code I posted here:
http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/151375/Input-field-clear.aspx[^]
Notice that the code block collapse link is also struck out (but it still appears to function as expected).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified on Friday, January 28, 2011 1:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
The link tags seem not to be working for you either. 
|
|
|
|
|
Happy now?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is that HTML inside a PRE block (apart from B, EM and I) are rejected (as you saw), and if you wrap a PRE in a STRIKE tag then
a) it won't show in FF
b) it will include the collapse tag because the collapse tag wraps the PRE; it can't wrap the thing that wraps the PRE.
Solution 1 is to use <PRE style="text-decoration:line-through"> (which I've done)
Solution 2 is wait a couple of hours and I'll upload new code that allows STRIKE in PRE blocks.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
i found some more features for the code project. this might help many site visitors and members.
1) Articles can be saved in pdf/doc formats
2) if there are more than one sample code attached, provide a single link to download in a ZIP format.
thanks.
First and the Foremost: FIGHT TO WIN
|
|
|
|
|
Hari Om Prakash Sharma wrote: 1) Articles can be saved in pdf/doc formats
Please not in doc format, pdf I can somewhat understand but not doc.
It will only encourage plagiarism.
Hari Om Prakash Sharma wrote: 2) if there are more than one sample code attached, provide a single link to download in a ZIP format.
Already there.
Top of the article, if there is any source code available will have a link for it.
Something like :
'Download source code - 21 KB'
'Download source files - 30.12 KB'
'Download demo application - 3.49 KB'
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: Something like :
'Download source code - 21 KB'
'Download source files - 30.12 KB'
'Download demo application - 3.49 KB'
that is ok but one extra link might be there like
'Download source code - 21 KB'
'Download source files - 30.12 KB'
'Download demo application - 3.49 KB'
'Download All attached files - 54.61 KB'
First and the Foremost: FIGHT TO WIN
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with Tom: definitely not DOC format.
I'm not convinced we need PDF format either: either link to the article (in which case you always have the latest version) or use your browser File...Save As to save the whole page as a complete web page for off-line viewing. Why complicate it with PDF writers? Not everybody has one handy...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with OriginalGriff on both points. If you want a PDF version it's easy to create one locally with a PDF printer driver. I doubt that anyone really needs it in DOC format.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: it's easy to create one locally with a PDF printer driver
That's what I do.
Get Print-friendly version, print to PDF printer driver.
I am also testing this[^], which I have to add is very much a work in progress.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with 1st one because I thought some times about offline article(Don't want to save as web page) when no internet.
|
|
|
|
|
Then just save the page using your browser. I don't think this is a real burden.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: don't think this is a real burden.
but I think this is a burden on the users where i dont have any driver. i think if you do that this can solve users problems.
also, when im interested in keeping only arcle for offline purpose, this is extra burden on users to select the whole article and save it as pdf or printing using a pdf driver.
First and the Foremost: FIGHT TO WIN
|
|
|
|
|
Hari Om Prakash Sharma wrote: but I think this is a burden on the users where i dont have any driver
What about the burden on the authors who don't have any driver?
Hari Om Prakash Sharma wrote: when im interested in keeping only arcle for offline purpose, this is extra burden on users to select the whole article and save it as pdf or printing using a pdf driver.
Why? If you save it as a web page, you can open it offline in your browser, and read it, or print it. No-one needs a driver.
What you are suggesting won't improve things for anyone particularly, but will make life more awkward for some. Anyone who needs a PDF version is at liberty to create one - and they can tidy it up and spend the time sorting it out. Why should anyone else do that for them, for no benefit to themselves, or the majority of the users?
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
