|
We are working at our company office using some constant proxy.
sadly, we are thousands of us using same proxy 
That makes it worst!
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't the reason. The voting message appears in the page - there's no popup.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope - I've seen it in a pop-up as well.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have javascript enabled? Do you have any ad blockers or ad-ins installed that could cause our javascript to fail?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No Such pop-up today, till now.
Browser: Firefox
JavaScript is enabled
No Add-on's & Ad-blockers
It might be reason John gave, that someone probably is voting too much at my IP.
I don't remember if it is particular to any forum.
|
|
|
|
|
No, that won't do it.
The only reason I can see is if there's a javascript error. Can you please check the Error Console in FF for me next time it happens.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This has happened to be on a few occasions with FF v3.6.
I usually close out of FF and that does the job.
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, we have this feature... great! 
Thanks Chris and team for continous improvement on functionalities. 
|
|
|
|
|
This is great feature, i have been using on 'stack overflow'. Glad to see it here now.
|
|
|
|
|
I was voting messages/questions today (most of them up), and I hit the "someone at your IP address has been voting..." message, but it's been about 20 minutes, and I'm still seeing it. How long does it last?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is a variable feast.
I have had 30min lockouts, or sometimes just 5mins.
I think it is dependant on how many votes you apply in the programming fora.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
There is a per-minute and per-hour limit.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that explains the variation.
Thanks.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - we'll get that fixed ASAP
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
entersources.com
Current Registrar: DIRECTI INTERNET SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM
IP Address: 75.125.2.206 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
Registration Service Provided By: NHAN HOA SOFTWARE COMPANY
Contact: +844.35626536
Website: http://www.nhanhoa.com
Domain Name: ENTERSOURCES.COM
Registrant:
personal
Nguyen The Hung (vietcode@yahoo.com)
Kim Ma
Ha Noi
Ha Noi,10000
VN
Tel. +849.34664663
Creation Date: 26-Jul-2010
Expiration Date: 26-Jul-2011
Domain servers in listed order:
mdns1.nhanhoa.com
mdns2.nhanhoa.com
mdns3.nhanhoa.com
mdns4.nhanhoa.com
Administrative Contact:
personal
Nguyen The Hung (vietcode@yahoo.com)
Kim Ma
Ha Noi
Ha Noi,10000
VN
Tel. +849.34664663
Technical Contact:
personal
Nguyen The Hung (vietcode@yahoo.com)
Kim Ma
Ha Noi
Ha Noi,10000
VN
Tel. +849.34664663
Billing Contact:
personal
Nguyen The Hung (vietcode@yahoo.com)
Kim Ma
Ha Noi
Ha Noi,10000
VN
Tel. +849.34664663
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks guys, good catch
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Just wondering.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Everyday I am checking reputation points and getting surprise.
Today's surprise - around 3000 point lost in debator. and received 745 points in authority.
Regards,
Hiren.
be good(Help people in CP),do good(Vote if one finds helpful) all will happen good, In case happens bad(You are getting downvote for your best try to help OP) it will be good for later after(Countered with more points by humble member). - Gita sar in context of CP.
-So Guys don't care about downvote believe in you.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - all done. See this post[^].
There may be another one in a few weeks that will simply add participation points for very old sign-in events we haven't yet counted (since we will need to guess them based on other activity) but that will only add a few hundred participation points, nothing else.
Honestly though, while in fairness I'd like to scrape all sign in events I can, the 2 weekends of fine tuning is more than enough and I'd prefer just to leave things as they are and move on.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok.
I've lost about 3k points since the original recalc started two weeks ago - but I guess I'll have to live with that.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
I lost around 500 point in debator because of this My debator reputation point become silver from Gold 
Hope I will get back my lost reputation point. 
modified on Monday, January 17, 2011 3:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
One of the things that really bugs me about the article editing on this site, is the state the article ends up after it has been edited by CP.
I like the fact that i can edit my articles any time I please while it is in the Unedited Contribution state. Along come the CP editors (who do a great job, don't get me wrong) and 'finalise' the article.
This leaves the only method to edit, is to submit an email with the changes.
Why can't we still be able to edit the article after the editors, and all that happens is it returns to an Unedited Contribution state and returns to the bottom of the queue again.
Please can this workflow be reviewed.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies for not getting back to you earlier.
Our pan for this is to allow you to go in an edit your "edited" articles online and to have those edits create a new article version that will be in the "pending" state until an editor checks and approves. You'll be able to re-edit this pending update as often as you like.
Our reason for this is that once we've gone over an article to edit and polish we want to ensure that you're readers will always have a polished version of your article to view. Some authors edit our polished version and kill the formatting (or grammar, or spelling, or...) and degrade the experience. Doing it this way means you get the convenience of online editing and the readers get a good viewing experience.
This also speeds up the update process because in most cases approving online edits will be a very quick process.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
