|
I have no idea what you mean 
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: those shiny documents we cover our walls with
Cover, cover, what do you mean cover, mine has pride of place in the middle of the office wall, it does seem rather lonely out there though!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: it does seem rather lonely out there
so you didn't make copies to fill all the walls?
as soon as you have a couple of different originals, the copies allow for some interesting tiling patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
Based on points accumulated throughout the year in the Author and Authority categories.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking at an article submitted [^]by a user. While looking, I clicked to see his profile. I landed up here[^]. Now, when i click his name to see other details and reputation... I am directed to my details page instead of his!
Bug if somehow you land up on 0 articles/blogs/tips tab page?
Update: Sorry guys... don't know server timing playing game... after posting i see it was already done! My bad!
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if this is a bug but my article doesnt seem to appear on my profile?
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bug: your article is waiting for people to vote it for publication. In its present form I don't think that is likely, as it is more of a code dump than an article. Take a look at the Article Submission Guidelines[^] for some tips on how to improve it.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I did read the guidelines and so far I dont see me be straying from the right path.
|
|
|
|
|
4277480 wrote: I dont see me be straying from the right path.
There is not much in terms of article content; if you remove all the code then all that is left is a couple of paragraphs which really do not offer much in the way of explanation. Try reading through a few other articles to see the sort of thing that is generally acceptable.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I just clicked a link for 4277480[^]'s profile, but it took me to my own home page.
I just followed this link[^] and got to the correct place.
[edit:2]
It seems that any link of the form http://www.codeproject.com/Members/NNNNNN where NNNNNN is a membership number, will take me to my own home page.[/edit:2]
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny... when you use the link you provided, it's a real user on codeproject.
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/NNNNNN[^]
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if anyone will try this for all letters of the alphabet?
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: some people has/have entered tens/thousands/millions(?) of silly account names.
Cry "havoc", and let slip the hamsters of doom! (with apologies to YKW). 
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies for not replying ealier, but this is in our bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The online counter in the menu strip at the top seems to be going crazy - the number increments at a very high rate; it has gone from 50,000 to now over 60,000 in just over 5 minutes!
Is it working alright? Or are the hamsters performing a DDoS attack in protest?
![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
The system to update that value had too much caffeine after lunch.
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You have a whole system dedicated to updating that value?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Racks and racks of servers, plus a swat team of hamsters.
I hope you appreciate how such a seemingly simple, yet dangerously complex task is pulled off with such a minimum of fuss. We almost make it look trivial, don't we? <buffs fingernails>
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So, it's a system of systems - kind of a redundancy system system.
I would never have imagined. 
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a little bit of feedback/brainstorming about Quick Answers[^]. Just some ideas to help.
The current concept of differentiating between answers and comments doesn't work in my opinion. I see many users adding information by using 'Add an Answer' instead of using the 'New message' button on the bottom of the page. And I understand them, from a user perspective it's much more intuitive to press the first button. First you kinda answers questions other users had about the original question, secondly it gives everyone a very visible feedback (compared to the tiny message board on the bottom of the page). The first weeks I down-voted those "fake answers", but I don't do this any more, I just feel it's wrong to punish someone who explains himself and communicates with others.
Can Quick Answers be improved? I would suggest a design change (do I hear Codeproject staff swearing?). Allow two types of answers: answers and comments (two buttons 'Add an Answer' and 'Add a Comment'). Then get rid of the message board on the bottom, as it is not needed any more. If the original poster wrongly adds a "fake answer" other members should be able to change the message type to a comment. The display will become one unthreaded list, with answers and comments. KISS principle[^].
Hope it helps!
|
|
|
|
|
Give us about a week or so... 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I opened silverlight forum and see only 1 page. Further, at the end of the page the asnwers are not sequential it seems. Identation too is broken. Tried F5 few times... same every time...
Web 24 it is. IE8 i am using...
Have screenshot if needed... Can someone look and confirm if it's only me or same for all?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks fine with FF3.0 on Web19/20/21
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
Now with 26% more Twitter