|
I was looking at an article submitted [^]by a user. While looking, I clicked to see his profile. I landed up here[^]. Now, when i click his name to see other details and reputation... I am directed to my details page instead of his!
Bug if somehow you land up on 0 articles/blogs/tips tab page?
Update: Sorry guys... don't know server timing playing game... after posting i see it was already done! My bad!
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if this is a bug but my article doesnt seem to appear on my profile?
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bug: your article is waiting for people to vote it for publication. In its present form I don't think that is likely, as it is more of a code dump than an article. Take a look at the Article Submission Guidelines[^] for some tips on how to improve it.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I did read the guidelines and so far I dont see me be straying from the right path.
|
|
|
|
|
4277480 wrote: I dont see me be straying from the right path.
There is not much in terms of article content; if you remove all the code then all that is left is a couple of paragraphs which really do not offer much in the way of explanation. Try reading through a few other articles to see the sort of thing that is generally acceptable.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I just clicked a link for 4277480[^]'s profile, but it took me to my own home page.
I just followed this link[^] and got to the correct place.
[edit:2]
It seems that any link of the form http://www.codeproject.com/Members/NNNNNN where NNNNNN is a membership number, will take me to my own home page.[/edit:2]
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny... when you use the link you provided, it's a real user on codeproject.
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/NNNNNN[^]
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if anyone will try this for all letters of the alphabet? 
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: some people has/have entered tens/thousands/millions(?) of silly account names.
Cry "havoc", and let slip the hamsters of doom! (with apologies to YKW). 
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies for not replying ealier, but this is in our bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The online counter in the menu strip at the top seems to be going crazy - the number increments at a very high rate; it has gone from 50,000 to now over 60,000 in just over 5 minutes!
Is it working alright? Or are the hamsters performing a DDoS attack in protest?
![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
The system to update that value had too much caffeine after lunch.
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You have a whole system dedicated to updating that value?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Racks and racks of servers, plus a swat team of hamsters.
I hope you appreciate how such a seemingly simple, yet dangerously complex task is pulled off with such a minimum of fuss. We almost make it look trivial, don't we? <buffs fingernails>
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
So, it's a system of systems - kind of a redundancy system system.
I would never have imagined. 
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a little bit of feedback/brainstorming about Quick Answers[^]. Just some ideas to help.
The current concept of differentiating between answers and comments doesn't work in my opinion. I see many users adding information by using 'Add an Answer' instead of using the 'New message' button on the bottom of the page. And I understand them, from a user perspective it's much more intuitive to press the first button. First you kinda answers questions other users had about the original question, secondly it gives everyone a very visible feedback (compared to the tiny message board on the bottom of the page). The first weeks I down-voted those "fake answers", but I don't do this any more, I just feel it's wrong to punish someone who explains himself and communicates with others.
Can Quick Answers be improved? I would suggest a design change (do I hear Codeproject staff swearing?). Allow two types of answers: answers and comments (two buttons 'Add an Answer' and 'Add a Comment'). Then get rid of the message board on the bottom, as it is not needed any more. If the original poster wrongly adds a "fake answer" other members should be able to change the message type to a comment. The display will become one unthreaded list, with answers and comments. KISS principle[^].
Hope it helps!
|
|
|
|
|
Give us about a week or so... 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I opened silverlight forum and see only 1 page. Further, at the end of the page the asnwers are not sequential it seems. Identation too is broken. Tried F5 few times... same every time...
Web 24 it is. IE8 i am using...
Have screenshot if needed... Can someone look and confirm if it's only me or same for all?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks fine with FF3.0 on Web19/20/21
|
|
|
|
|
No, I can't replicate it.
FF 3.6.3. No issue.
[Edit]
I checked with IE8 and web 24 (got that at first attempt luckily), but couldn't replicate the problem.
You try again in sometime and see if it still persists.
[/Edit]
..Go Green..
|
|
|
|
|
Strange... its the same with me Web 22 this time... IE8..
Will try after sometime and see...
|
|
|
|
|
Check your filters to see if you are preventing display of some entries.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you need a newer version of Silverlight to see the forum.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
IMO a decent browser would suffice...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
Now with 26% more Twitter