|
Cpianism wrote: chris mandour
I know not of this chris mandour of whom you speak.
Certainly if it is a name, it ought to have majusculed primary characters, and second, it should be spelt correctly.
Twat------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Abusive User. Chris needed to take care of this.
|
|
|
|
|
You are the abusive and rude one, fancy spelling his name wrong!
And all that one voting, very silly isn't it.
Now go and get a life, loser.------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him, Dave. 
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
In the vain hope he goes away?
I just could not believe he wanted his own postings covered up.
He claims it was 'Private', if so, why post them on a public forum?
Hey ho, you are probably right. ------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Cpianism wrote:If something I did then it is personal
Nothing you do on the internet is personal. You brought it to the public, now please don't cry. Anyway, what's so bad? I think his signature is quite funny. And if you don't like it, why not just send him a friendly message, asking him to remove it? But instead of doing that, you are bringing it to public again, so you have again a reason to complain.
|
|
|
|
|
keefb is not attacking you. He has, as others have pointed out, placed an abbreviated transcript of a discussion between yourself and myself in his sig. Technically it's not an attack and not abusive, but it's clear that it was written in order to have a little poke at you.
He's only quoting, not making any comments on the discussion, so I'm not going to force him to do anything. I would much rather keefb didn't have that signature, but I would like, even better, for you and everyone else to settle down.
The more you complain about everything the more you fuel the guys to give you a hard time. Just let it slide, move along, and things will quieten down.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
| Done. Antoine de Saint-Exupery Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away
|
|
|
|
|
My part with keefb is done, but I still want the apology from dalek.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: quieten down
"quienten" down? Is this somen sorten of revengen for usingen gotten whenever I geten the chancen?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| I think some of the language from the Superbowl commentators done gone sunk in a little too deep. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of things:
1) Since you have brought attention to it, I suspect more people have read that you have negative reputation points.
2) Since the original discussion was publicly broadcast to the world, it can hardly be an attack to quote you, particularly when it is not out of context.
3) The truth is not considered an attack in law - for the simple reason that it is the truth. If you don't want it to be public knowledge, don't point at it an shout in a public forum!If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you read my previous post??? This issue had been handled when keefb deleted his sig.
|
|
|
|
|
If it weren't for the signature character limit, I'd have that in my signature, too..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
In the mentioned page (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleModifyRequest.aspx[^]), it is suggested to use gif/jpeg and file size as small as possible.
As most of images included in articles are screenshots, I would suggest:
- For screenshots (dialogs), use PNG, it has 100% quality and great compression for flat color areas.
- For photos or dialogs with photos, use JPG, it will compress better.
I would not recommend GIF. A standard GIF palette will produce noticeable color dithering.Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article ID must be provided
|
|
|
|
|
| ? cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I open the link that he provided it give me an error: Article ID must be provided
|
|
|
|
|
| That's because he's telling me the specific page, not a specific item. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
These are old, old (circa 2000) recommendations. I will update.
However, I use ACDSee for GIF compression and it's fantastic. Very few colour artefacts.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to edit an article I just posted, and it won't let me scroll all the way to the end of the article in the editor pane.
EDIT ========================
It also appears to have cut off the end of the article..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
The editor page was providing a subtle hint: your article is way too long. If you can't tell it all in a reasonably sized article, are you sure you really understand the subject?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's more like a shock to the system. It actually *is* a reasonably sized article. The problem is that so many short non-articles have been posted as articles, the system thinks that they must be representative of an appropriate size..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
For quite some time now, "step 3 of 4" of the Article Submission Wizzard states: "Article must be 100 words or more." The standards have dropped so much your article for sure must be shocking.
Of course the 100 limit is completely ridiculous, the boiler plate text is more than 100 words!
 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
