|
Regards,
Satips. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow;
Don't walk behind me, I may not lead;
Walk beside me, and just be my friend. - Albert Camus
|
|
|
|
|
Regards,
Satips.
Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow;
Don't walk behind me, I may not lead;
Walk beside me, and just be my friend. - Albert Camus
|
|
|
|
|
Using the Article Submission Wizard, the max size of the description field is about 315 chars. I think this is a bit too short. 400 - 500 chars would allow for more information, especially when you have a series of articles, and you're trying to note the differences between them.
|
|
|
|
|
Get rid of the Pop UP ads, they suck!
Schneider
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you pay for this site.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
|
eschneider100 wrote: eat me
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
We don't have pop-up ads.
We do have intellitxt ads and if you go to your profile you can choose not to ever see them. No strings attached.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
They are popups. But at least you can get rid of them.
Thanks,
Schneider
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pop up ads are not appearing from CP, they appear from the "free pr0n" search tool which you've installed.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
I have double PopupFilter to block:
(*) Google Toolbar
(*) Inbox Notifier
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I open the main page of code project forum(http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp[^]), I see 376 messages in "Meetings and Get-Togethers" forum in column("Total"), but when i open that forum i see less than 10 messages. is it a bug or i am doing some thing wrong.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
What does the "Messages Since" drop down say? If it doesn't say "All" then that's the reason.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: "Messages Since" drop down say
Thanks now it is clear.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Is it possible when a user rate a message or an article then that user must provide some comments that why he/she has rated on that position.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice, but I suspect that the idiots who 1 vote for the fun of it would just end up putting rubbish in.
|
|
|
|
|
This might help in reduction of Univoting.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: It would be nice, but I suspect that the idiots who 1 vote for the fun of it would just end up putting rubbish in.
Well said.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
You'll end up getting a lot of blank submissions if it's mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
I just rated you a 1.
My comments: adfsafdjfdfj3afdjfd
|
|
|
|
|
When I suggested this, and chris brought up the same issue, I proposed a fuzzy logic system that would catch probably 50% of rubbish entries, and mark suspect ones. Rubbish entries ones would result in the 1 vote being disallowed, and after three disallowed 1 votes, would suspend the user from voting altogether for a predetermined period of time. Continued abuse of the system would remove the user's voting abilities altogether - forever. Suspect votes would allow the victim to request a review of the vote. If the voter posts a certain number of "suspect" votes, once again his voting privileges would be suspended, and continued abuse would eventually result in permanent revocation of his voting privileges.
This vote tracking would only be available for articles (and messages posted in articles). Granted, this system would require a lot of work to implement, and some time on the part of the site owners to admin (I suggested that platinum members be allowed to help out), but there are over 4 million registered members on the site, and something HAS to be done.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I proposed a fuzzy logic system that would catch probably 50% of rubbish entries, and mark suspect ones. Rubbish entries ones would result in the 1 vote being disallowed, and after three disallowed 1 votes, would suspend the user from voting altogether for a predetermined period of time. Continued abuse of the system would remove the user's voting abilities altogether - forever. Suspect votes would allow the victim to request a review of the vote. If the voter posts a certain number of "suspect" votes, once again his voting privileges would be suspended, and continued abuse would eventually result in permanent revocation of his voting privileges
I believe that the solution you had provided is wonderful, but why are you considering that all these things should be implemented in a single step, instead of that this functionality can be implemented in step by step, and may be the first step would be make comments compulsory when a person rates the message.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
Don't think so.
Michael Dunn wrote: My comments: adfsafdjfdfj3afdjfd
I would than know what to think about this rating!
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
I agree with you on this.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
