|
Hi,
Is it possible when a user rate a message or an article then that user must provide some comments that why he/she has rated on that position.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice, but I suspect that the idiots who 1 vote for the fun of it would just end up putting rubbish in.
|
|
|
|
|
This might help in reduction of Univoting.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: It would be nice, but I suspect that the idiots who 1 vote for the fun of it would just end up putting rubbish in.
 Well said.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
You'll end up getting a lot of blank submissions if it's mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
I just rated you a 1.
My comments: adfsafdjfdfj3afdjfd
|
|
|
|
|
When I suggested this, and chris brought up the same issue, I proposed a fuzzy logic system that would catch probably 50% of rubbish entries, and mark suspect ones. Rubbish entries ones would result in the 1 vote being disallowed, and after three disallowed 1 votes, would suspend the user from voting altogether for a predetermined period of time. Continued abuse of the system would remove the user's voting abilities altogether - forever. Suspect votes would allow the victim to request a review of the vote. If the voter posts a certain number of "suspect" votes, once again his voting privileges would be suspended, and continued abuse would eventually result in permanent revocation of his voting privileges.
This vote tracking would only be available for articles (and messages posted in articles). Granted, this system would require a lot of work to implement, and some time on the part of the site owners to admin (I suggested that platinum members be allowed to help out), but there are over 4 million registered members on the site, and something HAS to be done.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I proposed a fuzzy logic system that would catch probably 50% of rubbish entries, and mark suspect ones. Rubbish entries ones would result in the 1 vote being disallowed, and after three disallowed 1 votes, would suspend the user from voting altogether for a predetermined period of time. Continued abuse of the system would remove the user's voting abilities altogether - forever. Suspect votes would allow the victim to request a review of the vote. If the voter posts a certain number of "suspect" votes, once again his voting privileges would be suspended, and continued abuse would eventually result in permanent revocation of his voting privileges
I believe that the solution you had provided is wonderful, but why are you considering that all these things should be implemented in a single step, instead of that this functionality can be implemented in step by step, and may be the first step would be make comments compulsory when a person rates the message.
Best Regards,
Mushq
Mushtaque Ahmed Nizamani
Software Engineer
Ultimus Pakistan
"English is my second language, so please don't mind if i do some grammatical or spelling mistakes in my messages."
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
Don't think so.
Michael Dunn wrote: My comments: adfsafdjfdfj3afdjfd
I would than know what to think about this rating!
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: Requiring a comment achieves nothing.
I agree with you on this.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Where is the store located? I wanted to buy a t-shirt. No dice on the coffee mug - I'm an iced tea man.
Black t-shirt, with the green alien inside an orange aurora would look good.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have an "average article rating" score at the top of the articles page in our profiles. Can we have a similar score at the top of the messages (latest comments) page as well?
-----------------------------
In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new to codeproject and one thing that I find difficult is figuring out what part of a forum post belongs to the message and what part belongs to the author's signature. While reading messages, I sometimes get confused with the last line of an author's response, since it seemingly has nothing to do with the question -- of course it's because it's her signature!
Something as simple as ------------ before the sig would suffice.
Thanks,
Phil
|
|
|
|
|
PhilDanger wrote: Something as simple as ------------ before the sig would suffice.
If you want ASCII instead of html, a proper sig dash is "-- ".
--
You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Well, either way it should be inserted automatically if a signature is present 
|
|
|
|
|
Try hitting Ctrl+F5. It's subtle, but I don't want to interfere with dividers that members already use.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Subtle, yes. I like it.
---- Yes, but can you blame them for doing so if that's the only legal way they can hire programmers they want at the rate they can afford?-- Nish on sketchy hiring practices
|
|
|
|
|
You can distinguish my signature easily 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris - the Univoter is at it again in the lounge.
Quick question - when a univoter is identified and removed, are their votes removed as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Univoter
What's that?
|
|
|
|
|
A drive by (or serial) 1 voter. Somebody who just votes 1 for fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Somebody who just votes 1 for fun
 There really are such ... around?
And Chris is able to identify them?
Again a good reason for me, for a non anonym rating system, like I suggested once!
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Peter,
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Somebody who just votes 1 for fun.
I can't stop beating the dead horse... I believe he does it out of spite.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
Some crazy guy who puts '1' for all the forums. We are observing this in full vigor since (India) afternoon. It is now Friday midnight 0034 hours and still active perhaps.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
