|
I'm looking everywhere but no luck so far. I'll keep trying.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
I found a copy of this article from a stack of backups from long ago. I wouldn't swear that it was saved in the final form that I submitted the article. Anyway it was called ODlgApp - "Window Wrapper for WinCE Win32 dialog app (part 2 of 3)"
I can send it to you again if you'd like. Your call. But I wanted to let you know that I recovered it and thank you for your help and time.
Brad Manske
|
|
|
|
|
I'd love to post it (again), even just for the sake of posterity. We can even set the posted date as back in 2002.
I looked again through my backups and couldn't find anything with "ODlgApp" in it. Bummer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
How should I send this to you - considering the circumstances?
|
|
|
|
|
chris at codeproject dot com. I'll format and post as soon as I get it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/News.aspx?ntag=00269097349674230[^] gives:
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location: jar:file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Mozilla%20Firefox/chrome/toolkit.jar!/content/global/netError.xhtml
Line Number 60, Column 12: <title>&loadError.label;</title>
-----------^
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering if the CodeProject effect knocked it out.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the Codeproject effect. If we or our members are guilty of anything here, it's "loving too much."
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Possible, it's back online now.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Can we do away with the guerrilla warfare now? Can't you allow us to see who votes on messages? Article voting's fine the way it is, just non-technical forums and article messages. I'd especially like to see who keeps voting 2 on half the messages in articles, including the authors' perfectly innocuous responses.
|
|
|
|
|
Indivara wrote: Can we do away with the guerrilla warfare now?
...and start all out frontal assaults? No.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmmm. Maybe I can come up with an alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Different question - what is to prevent me from making dozens of sock puppets and using them to delete other members' accounts? (I mean not me personally. Any member) Using anonymous proxies?
Wouldn't it be better if an admin made the final decision? Or do you already do that?
|
|
|
|
|
We monitor the report queue everyday. If we find that someone is spuriously reporting members then it's their account that gets removed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
but hamster warfare is Okay? I see how it is Chris. 
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
How about if you down-vote an answer in Q&A then you need to give reason why you are down-voting the answers.I have seen many down-voted good answers.
Is it something you will consider ?
|
|
|
|
|
daffadsfdsaf
(feel better now?)
PS no actual votes were cast in demonstrating why I don't think this will help.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: daffadsfdsaf
(feel better now?)
Now i'll know that the who does that is just a troll and ignore and report them.Don't you think that will help ?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Sock puppets are too easy to create.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
CS2011 wrote: then you need to give reason why you are down-voting the answers
My feeling is that all it will produce is noise. Answers are read by the original poster, and by those who may have searched and found the question, but in general questions and answers have a limited viewership (individually) and so the chances of having a system whereby the community can police downvotes (such as is the case with articles) is limited and probably unproductive)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In programming forums the "Reply to Message" page now shows instructions in between question and edit box. The net result is I can't read the question and the reply on a single screen, this is not working at all. Also, the instructions weren't supposed to be shown to experienced users.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Reply to Programming Message now very hard
Sounds like you need more instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
This is bugging me as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Let it bug you no longer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
