|
Can we do away with the guerrilla warfare now? Can't you allow us to see who votes on messages? Article voting's fine the way it is, just non-technical forums and article messages. I'd especially like to see who keeps voting 2 on half the messages in articles, including the authors' perfectly innocuous responses.
|
|
|
|
|
Indivara wrote: Can we do away with the guerrilla warfare now?
...and start all out frontal assaults? No.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmmm. Maybe I can come up with an alternative.
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Different question - what is to prevent me from making dozens of sock puppets and using them to delete other members' accounts? (I mean not me personally. Any member) Using anonymous proxies?
Wouldn't it be better if an admin made the final decision? Or do you already do that?
|
|
|
|
|
We monitor the report queue everyday. If we find that someone is spuriously reporting members then it's their account that gets removed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
but hamster warfare is Okay? I see how it is Chris. 
-----------------------------
Just along for the ride.
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
How about if you down-vote an answer in Q&A then you need to give reason why you are down-voting the answers.I have seen many down-voted good answers.
Is it something you will consider ?
|
|
|
|
|
daffadsfdsaf
(feel better now?)
PS no actual votes were cast in demonstrating why I don't think this will help.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: daffadsfdsaf
(feel better now?)
Now i'll know that the who does that is just a troll and ignore and report them.Don't you think that will help ?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Sock puppets are too easy to create.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
CS2011 wrote: then you need to give reason why you are down-voting the answers
My feeling is that all it will produce is noise. Answers are read by the original poster, and by those who may have searched and found the question, but in general questions and answers have a limited viewership (individually) and so the chances of having a system whereby the community can police downvotes (such as is the case with articles) is limited and probably unproductive)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In programming forums the "Reply to Message" page now shows instructions in between question and edit box. The net result is I can't read the question and the reply on a single screen, this is not working at all. Also, the instructions weren't supposed to be shown to experienced users.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Reply to Programming Message now very hard
Sounds like you need more instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
This is bugging me as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Let it bug you no longer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just responded to a post by AspDotNetDev and I have to post my idea here now. It may not be a new idea but I think it deserves some consideration from the community.
An internal, private messaging system to replace the external e-mail system. You can then manage your private messages via an added panel/page in your settings page. This would help keep your anonymity for those of us who are international super spies.
Useful? Just a thought.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
I recommended something like this, but I'm still not sure Chris understood what I was meant. 
|
|
|
|
|
It was discussed absolutely ages ago.
If I remember correctly [apologies Chris if I am wrong], but Chris didn't want to start taking discussions into the private domain. Its a community project and he wants the chat to remain public. If users want to start discussing in private, then they can use their email for that.
|
|
|
|
|
That's not what he said in the thread I linked to. He said "Allowing members to anonymously contact other members is an invitation for stalking and harrassment." That confused me, because I never said the contact would be anonymous... it would merely be without sharing email addresses.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I am talking about discussions that happened way before that message.
(maybe i dreamt it!)
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, well, that reason doesn't make much sense to me either. Those of us who regularly answer questions know not to keep them private and those who don't know that can still use private messages (even though they include email addresses) to take things offline when they shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Your idea, as I read it, was to use the current private message system but with "the ability to send a private message to a user without another user's email address being revealed".
The current suggestion is for a fully internal message system.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The number one goal of CodeProject is to help software developers write better code, faster. Forum discussions allow members to have good back-and-forth discussions on development. Questions and Answers allows to-the-point answers to your thorny questions. Articles and tips provide the raw material for research. Ultimately the more material members post the more is available for others to review and learn from.
I'm still not convinced that an internal message system, in the context of helping others, fits in.
Yet.
The issue of stalking, spam etc is something that has always been a concern but I do think it can be overcome given the new systems we've put in place over the last couple of months.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
