Bugs and Suggestions

   

FirstPrevNext

Re: Stopped Receiving Newsletters Vince Yonemitsu21-Mar-12 4:18 Vince Yonemitsu 21-Mar-12 4:18  Comcast put us on a block list a little while ago, I have been in contact with them about this and I am trying to get us removed. The orignial report from them was that we sent out too many emails and we sent them out too quickly...It's a good thing the mailers I setup only have 1 gb of ram. I have been trying to resolve this with comcast directly and hopefully it will be sorted out soon. We actively monitor our PTR, rDNS, Blacklists and other spam related concerns but it is rarely related to any of this. Typically its purely about volume or speed of delivery. We occaisonally trip AOL and Yahoo as well however they are a bit more sophisticated in that they will throttle our access so eventually everything gets through. When I hear back from comcast I'll post an update. Actually as I was typing this I just got a message back saying we were removed... I'll flush the mailqueue's and hopefully they will get through. Re: Stopped Receiving Newsletters Randor 23-Mar-12 13:06 Randor 23-Mar-12 13:06  Hmmmm Your not sending 2,000,000+ e-mails all at once are you? Back in the 1990's I was administering some high-load Unix servers and when I performed daily/weekly mailings to site members I would send A-D and wait 15 minutes then send E-H and so forth to avoid being blacklisted. When you send millions of e-mails all at once there is no way for the recieving end to distinguish a DOS attack from a legitimate mass mailing unless they have white listed the origin IP. Unfortunately it is easy to spoof the From: e-mail address... so the only way for a systems administrator to 'white list' is to use the IP of the sending server. The addresses contained in the 'Received: from' header can also be spoofed if passing through a relay. Re: Stopped Receiving Newsletters Vince Yonemitsu26-Mar-12 8:25 Vince Yonemitsu 26-Mar-12 8:25  With many of the big email providers they don't block on the basis of the number of messages per hour or minute or second, but by the concurrent connections. It’s a juggling act here to try and keep our addresses clean to make sure everything gets through. To answer your question though, no we don't send out to everyone at the same time. Although, I sure would like to send them out all at once. Yes, Server side whitelisting goes either by domain or more often by IP. Domain and email level whitelisting is still something that needs to happen on the user end though as most places have implemented user defined whitelists. These are typically not done by IP. modified 26-Mar-12 14:46pm. 2 comment blocks for article R. Giskard Reventlov19-Mar-12 8:50 R. Giskard Reventlov 19-Mar-12 8:50  Have noticed 2 comment/discussion blocks appearing for some articles. Here is an example[^]. "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me Re: 2 comment blocks for article Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 16:58 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 16:58  Yes, for new versions of existing articles a new forum, specifically to cater to comments on changes of the article is added. There is an explanation above each discussion board that should make this clear, but if the explanation isn't there (or isn't clear) let me know. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: 2 comment blocks for article R. Giskard Reventlov20-Mar-12 12:15 R. Giskard Reventlov 20-Mar-12 12:15  Thanks "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me Source code is cut-off in article although it is fine in editor Jovan Popovic(MSFT)19-Mar-12 0:35 Jovan Popovic(MSFT) 19-Mar-12 0:35  Hi, I have a problem with the following article ASP.NET MVC3 Razor With JQuery For Beginners[^]. In the edit section, the second code listing (above the picture is cut-off). If you open this link in the edit section you can see that this part of code ends with C# @Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => there is a code after this statement but it is not generated here. When I go to the article and edit is this code is not cut-off. It seems to me that this > causes some problem where and ends the code on this position. I have tried to remove this => and replace it with just = . In that case code is continued to the next =>. This is very strange because I have other parts of code where I have used => but it is now cut-off there. If you need any additional info let me know. Thanks, Jovan Re: Source code is cut-off in article although it is fine in editor Sean Ewington19-Mar-12 2:58 Sean Ewington 19-Mar-12 2:58  Hi Jovan, Did you already fix this on your own? It seems OK to me now. Please let me know if all is well. I suspect it was an angle bracket that was like this: > instead of this: > Inside pre blocks our article editor requires the latter. Thanks, Sean Ewington The Code Project Re: Source code is cut-off in article although it is fine in editor Jovan Popovic(MSFT)19-Mar-12 5:45 Jovan Popovic(MSFT) 19-Mar-12 5:45  Hi Sean, No, problem is still happening on ASP.NET MVC3 Razor With JQuery For Beginners[^]. I have sent you separate email with screenshots. Thanks, Jovan Re: Source code is cut-off in article although it is fine in editor Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 6:47 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 6:47  Our syntax colouriser is getting scared and confused by the lambda notation inside the HTML. I'll talk to it and calm it down. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Code Project support graphics/pictures Brandon-X1200017-Mar-12 16:57 Brandon-X12000 17-Mar-12 16:57  Hello everyone, I was wondering if Code Project could support pictures, like display them in posts, that would be nice, I mean if people abuse them, there's always that "report the person and let administration ban them from Code Project or take care of it", is it a memory/storage problem for the web masters, I was wondering if any of you'll had ideas like this... Regards, Brandon T. H. Re: Code Project support graphics/pictures Indivara18-Mar-12 17:21 Indivara 18-Mar-12 17:21  They were supported some time ago, and removed for the very reason you mentioned. Too much trouble, I guess. Re: Code Project support graphics/pictures Slacker00718-Mar-12 23:55 Slacker007 18-Mar-12 23:55  I believe CP only supports photos and videos in articles. You can post links to pictures or videos in other forums. [edit] If we allowed pictures in CP then anyone could post anything, offensive or not. I'm talking about elephants dancing in the sunshine, if you know what I mean. "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011) "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) Re: Code Project support graphics/pictures OriginalGriff19-Mar-12 2:25 OriginalGriff 19-Mar-12 2:25  I really wish I didn't... Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water Re: Code Project support graphics/pictures Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 4:56 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 4:56  Yeah, my mental eyes are hurting too. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Adverts overlaying video articles DaveAuld16-Mar-12 21:45 DaveAuld 16-Mar-12 21:45  Chris, Check out my comments at the bottom of this article; Introducing Visual Studio LightSwitch[^] Basically, if the video is playing, and your browser client space is less than ~1260px then the right hand Tower ad is over the top of the video, and doesn't go behind like the rest of the text. don't know if you can tweak the zOrder. Cheers, Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject Re: Adverts overlaying video articles Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 4:57 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 4:57  Could I suggest that maybe 1280 is a little too big? Not only from a screensize perspective, but also from the point that a smaller screensize will dramatically help member bandwidth issues in downloading the video cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Adverts overlaying video articles DaveAuld19-Mar-12 5:26 DaveAuld 19-Mar-12 5:26  Chris Maunder wrote: Could I suggest that maybe 1280 is a little too big? You could suggest it........up to you, there is a forum for that Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject Re: Adverts overlaying video articles Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 6:36 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 6:36  Dear Bob, could you please... cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Adverts overlaying video articles Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 7:23 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 7:23  It only just hit me that you weren't the author of that video Sorry - I'm wading through an avalanche of email and my brain is short circuiting this morning. Let me...adjust. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Re: Adverts overlaying video articles DaveAuld19-Mar-12 7:48 DaveAuld 19-Mar-12 7:48  Chris Maunder wrote: It only just hit me that you weren't the author of that video So you were having a "Magical Mystery Maunder Moment" (aka senior moment) comes to all! Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn Folding Stats: Team CodeProject Re: Adverts overlaying video articles Chris Maunder19-Mar-12 9:24 Chris Maunder 19-Mar-12 9:24  cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP Short Coming of Deleting Files on Article Andrew Rissing16-Mar-12 8:10 Andrew Rissing 16-Mar-12 8:10  I updated my article and removed a few files that are no longer necessary. While the new version hasn't been released, the old article still points to these files and now no longer works. Perhaps, it would be best to copy all files over to the working, delete the files in the working, and, once the article is approved, move everything over to the 'production'. Approving One's Own Article Andrew Rissing16-Mar-12 8:07 Andrew Rissing 16-Mar-12 8:07  I just recently used the new editor (which totally rocks) to upload a new version of my article. After doing such, I found I was able to go and approve my own article. I would assume this isn't a desired behavior. I mean, who wouldn't approve something they just submitted. Re: Approving One's Own Article Chris Maunder16-Mar-12 10:09 Chris Maunder 16-Mar-12 10:09  Currently we have no problem with you doing this but we are going to change this so you can't approve your own articles. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 22-May-24 19:03 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...1318131913201321132213231324132513261327 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.