|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Since everything is hidden from the user, there might be a code that can behind the scenes sniffing something in your filesystem.
Actually, Macromedia / Adobe have been total fascists about security in Flash - there's already plenty of resistance to Flash from traditional developers and usability people, so the last thing they want is to have to deal with security accusations as well.
More info here:
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_16629
|
|
|
|
|
Actually with Atlas, they're not removing Javascript. They're adding more features to it.;P
regards,
Mircea
Many people spend their life going to sleep when they’re not sleepy and waking up while they still are.
|
|
|
|
|
No, since there is C# and C++/CLR there is simply no need for J#. That's my opinion, maybe other people think diferrent.
|
|
|
|
|
I would not want to be on that team, except for the leaning experience (and the pay).
I would like to know if MS paid the guy who invented the name C-Sharp (C#). He wrote a series of articles for ‘Dr Dobbs Journal’ (or was that the ‘C Users Journal’) on a DOS library call C-Sharp. Who he wrote it for does not matter now since the ‘C Users Journal’ became the ‘C/C++ Users Journal’ and has now been merged with the ‘Dr Dobbs Journal’. I only hope they are maintaining the CUJ library (public domain code submitted by readers, etc…), which included code from the CMP days.
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."Edsger Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
So the main difference between J# and Vb.NET is that theres a lot more damn fools using vb.net?
All of the java programmers i deal with that have since moved to .NET (and yes, that happens, often these days even), all are pretty comfortable almost immediately with C#.
|
|
|
|
|
kevferron wrote:
So the main difference between J# and Vb.NET is that theres a lot more damn fools using vb.net?
Yup!
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Java developers embrace C#.
VB developers embrace...quess what?
Who's left ot embrace J#? And really, the question is why should they? What clear advantages it presents over C#?
regards,
Mircea
Many people spend their life going to sleep when they’re not sleepy and waking up while they still are.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, ok, OT I know. However, back in the Day before MS lost the lawsuit it was the best IDE I had ever worked with. Too bad they insisted on the ability to use COM. J#, what is that anyway? The 7th revision of C#? Bah. I have never actually known anyone to even discuss J#. I think I have seen a book on it in the book store, it looked lonely an unread.
"Until the day of his death, no man can be sure of his courage" -- Jean Anouilh
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 person answered not sure?
How the hell can you not be sure you program using J#?
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
In the morning he clicks the icon "Editor", then he codes in the only programming we know, in the evening he closes "Editor". In an environment without titles, he doesn't have to know how the language is called...
_____________________________________________________________________________
I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.
|
|
|
|
|
Corinna John wrote: In the morning he clicks the icon "Editor", then he codes in the only programming we know, in the evening he closes "Editor". In an envirinment without titles, he doesn't have to know how the language is called...
That would be called offshoring.
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by the votes, I feel I touched a nerve!
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Or, though they may be certain they program in J#, they are not sure it is for a living (I interpret this as paying the bills) or not. Is it possible to program primarily in J# and make a living?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably they are not sure that they make a living out of it !![Laugh | :laugh:](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/smiley_laugh.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he wasn't so sure he was getting paid enuf to be doing "for a living".
Norman Fung
|
|
|
|
|
or J# is one of the all time losers of programming languages.
I suspect the latter.
Marc
Pensieve
Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
|
|
|
|
|
I dont see how it is a "Great Opportunity"
Norman Fung
|
|
|
|
|
I've only run across one company that was using J#. The EFax sdk was written in J#. They may be the only company using it...........
|
|
|
|
|
that means IMHO it is a product to target Java. That means it is a placebo.
Greeting from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO J# and VisualJ are for people who have never been good enough to code Java for a living.
They want to switch over to pure Windows programming, but are afraid of failing to learn another language...
_____________________________________________________________________________
I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
There is hi % of Nos then I am thinking y J# is still there?;P
Any comments.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's Microsoft's attempt to convert J2EE devs over to .NET. I don't think CP has a lot of Java devs, so the numbers will be low.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah u might b right that CP does not have alots of JAVA advocates What Microsoft is thinking about J#? I never meet any J# developer in Pakistan. There are many Java developers.
|
|
|
|