|
Ok, ok, OT I know. However, back in the Day before MS lost the lawsuit it was the best IDE I had ever worked with. Too bad they insisted on the ability to use COM. J#, what is that anyway? The 7th revision of C#? Bah. I have never actually known anyone to even discuss J#. I think I have seen a book on it in the book store, it looked lonely an unread.
"Until the day of his death, no man can be sure of his courage" -- Jean Anouilh
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 person answered not sure? 
How the hell can you not be sure you program using J#?
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
In the morning he clicks the icon "Editor", then he codes in the only programming we know, in the evening he closes "Editor". In an environment without titles, he doesn't have to know how the language is called... 
_____________________________________________________________________________
I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.
|
|
|
|
|
Corinna John wrote: In the morning he clicks the icon "Editor", then he codes in the only programming we know, in the evening he closes "Editor". In an envirinment without titles, he doesn't have to know how the language is called...
 That would be called offshoring.
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by the votes, I feel I touched a nerve!
Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Or, though they may be certain they program in J#, they are not sure it is for a living (I interpret this as paying the bills) or not. Is it possible to program primarily in J# and make a living?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably they are not sure that they make a living out of it !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he wasn't so sure he was getting paid enuf to be doing "for a living".
Norman Fung
|
|
|
|
|
or J# is one of the all time losers of programming languages.
I suspect the latter.
Marc
Pensieve
Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
|
|
|
|
|
I dont see how it is a "Great Opportunity"
Norman Fung
|
|
|
|
|
I've only run across one company that was using J#. The EFax sdk was written in J#. They may be the only company using it...........
|
|
|
|
|
that means IMHO it is a product to target Java. That means it is a placebo. 
Greeting from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO J# and VisualJ are for people who have never been good enough to code Java for a living.
They want to switch over to pure Windows programming, but are afraid of failing to learn another language...
_____________________________________________________________________________
I don't expect too much, all I want is your vote for Halbsichtigkeit.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
There is hi % of Nos then I am thinking y J# is still there?;P
Any comments.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's Microsoft's attempt to convert J2EE devs over to .NET. I don't think CP has a lot of Java devs, so the numbers will be low.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah u might b right that CP does not have alots of JAVA advocates  What Microsoft is thinking about J#? I never meet any J# developer in Pakistan. There are many Java developers.
|
|
|
|
|
how much code does it take to call yourself a j# developer? if it's two lines then give me ten minutes and i'll update my CV.. .
|
|
|
|
|
Now that we have Mono around for Linux, I'm surprised Java is still alive because it is so much slower than .NET and Mono. J# was created to simply give the Java programmers an easy path to migrate to .NET. The extremely poor performance of Java has always been its weakness, and I have never seen a solid way to overcome it.
Daniel Petersen
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Petersen wrote: and I have never seen a solid way to overcome it.
ANSI C++.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree that C++ is the best language to build high performance applications, but I was referring to there not being a solid way to overcome the problem within Java itself.
Daniel Petersen
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Petersen wrote: I'm surprised Java is still alive because it is so much slower than .NET and Mono
In my experience, Java is pretty much as slow fast as .NET, and less slow faster than Mono.
My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have to agree. I think the slowest thing about Java could be the UI libs, but for console apps it's not bad. Although, I still hate Java, I'm just trying to be fair. But, JSP is a steaming pile of crap though.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to disagree with your assesment (if I am decoding it correctly...). I believe that Java is not near as fast as .NET and in my opinion (at least running MONO in the WIN32 environment) MONO is faster than .NET... Please don't flame me for that statement people... I meant no harm by it...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
