|
|
|
|
|
...just in the big pool of C now?
Or is Apple no longer important enough?
I thought it was worse 2 years ago when they fell down to below 15% market share.. but aren't they back up to 17%?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Dear "Crustie",
ObjC is becoming "retired"
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
this is a Apple synonym for not in use anymore.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not on the list because of the number of other surveys saying Swift has largely overtaken ObjC.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Probably.
But still Java/Kotlin are at the moment a "pair" (for Android) compareable to ObjC/Swift for iOS. And Kotlin is there, but ObjC is not.
While Swift nowadays has more devs than ObjC (totally understandable when I think about the cruel strange syntax of ObjC... a miracle how this language could be successful EVER), Kotlin still looks for ppl to adopt it.
I personally do like Kotlin very much but still, the support in Android Studio has its flaws... It's not a "first grade citizen" as it has been promised.
Every project still gets the Java Folder structure and no Kotlin folders by default... You always feel like a foreigner when u start to code Kotlin in an Android project.
I hope this gets better in Studio 4.0
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect we're talking a mixture of work and hobby development here.
It would be interesting to know if some of the more obscure selections are actually being used in anger.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: are actually being used in anger.
In the case of several of them, they always make developers angry ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I've often said that Javascript shouldn't be included in any discussion about languages ...
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
...of a company bringing ios, android and windows to the customers.
so we have
C++ for low level (SIP)
C# for windows
Objective-C/Swift for iOS
Java/Kotlin for Android
And of course SQL for the database... what else?
Currently evaluating Xamarin and other platform-independent options... but honestly... I am not sure if they ever make it out of our playground repository
modified 15-Jul-19 8:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't that a framework, not a language?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a C++ framework so it kind of implies the language.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No it doesn't. I'm sure it can be used with other languages.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a C++ framework and it definitely can not be used with other languages.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I'm sure it can be used with other languages. I can't say it with certainty, but I would not bet anything on that afirmation
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a C++ API making heavy use of compiler macros. While not impossible, its design would make any API wrappers massive fugly affairs (and MFC is fugly enough on its own).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
You don't want to use MFC with C++, never mind any other languages...
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
That's been my suspicion since the 90s. I Don't recall ever hearing anything good about it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there's some sadist somewhere who has wrapped with C exports and built a DLL.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you are thinking of MVC?
|
|
|
|