|
I see many surveys on net showing Java is more used and liked than C#.
I am surprised seeing here that C# is most used language.
How is that?
Amit Joshi
Value of the value is valued only if its value is valued.
|
|
|
|
|
Today you have to add Kotlin to the Java pool.
Currently, this makes 8 (!) uses more... mmmhhh... ok forget it
And yes, I am a bit surprised too - when I think about the amount of android apps written every day. Hard to believe, everybody is running c#/xamarin and/or unity only.
|
|
|
|
|
You know this is primarily a .Net forum right?
|
|
|
|
|
ScottM1 wrote: You know this is primarily a .Net forum right?
No, I honestly didn't. What part of "Code Project Lounge" would imply that? Not that I'm complaining, but I too was surprised by the survey results.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I guess it isn't obvious but there are not many Java developers on Code Project. You'll see there are zero Java questions under quick answers.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, That's why C# is rated higher than JavaScript too.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprises and businesses have to pay for Oracle Java updates now. Tons of them are switching or have already switched to other languages. Sure, folks can switch to OpenJDK but I think more are turning away wjere they can.
|
|
|
|
|
I do use Java at work for somethings, but I'm sticking to version 8 of OpenJDK, it's nice and stable, and just works.
Also f*** Oracle in what they are doing to Java.
|
|
|
|
|
How many of you use heavily the .NET framework with C# compared to C# with just the basic functionalities of .NET to make it work and other frameworks?
I don't like .NET due to horrible documentation, terrible implementation and obscene learning curve compared to anything else available but C# on its own is a simple language. Just wanted to know how far from the C# market I am now.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
What part of the framework? I know the depths and plumbing of WPF intimately. I knew winforms stuff when it was a wrapper for the win32 comctrls dll, haven't used it since 2005. I've used the OWIN web stuff, and i've used most of the utility stuff captured in the framework.
In general i've found the documentation pretty good, failing that i just use dotpeek to decompile the framework if i need to do anything really obscure.
|
|
|
|
|
John Stewien wrote: failing that i just use dotpeek to decompile the framework if i need to do anything really obscure.
You don't even need to do that - MS published the source code several years ago, and provided it in a handy searchable format, complete with all comments: Reference Source[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: and obscene learning curve compared to anything else available
Funny, I have that reaction to just about everything except the .NET framework.
But to answer your question - heavily use the .NET framework along with C#. Though there are still significant parts I haven't ever dealt with ("need to know" and all that.)
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: horrible documentation Hmm. I find that most documentation is wretched, but the .NET documentation doesn't seem to suck any more than any other. The biggest lack I've seen in the MS documentation are comprehensive, working examples. Many of the .NET code snippets are trivial and do not show the background work you need to do.den2k88 wrote: terrible implementation Hmm2. How so? Even though I'm stuck using .NET 3.5, I've generally found that implementation to be stable.den2k88 wrote: obscene learning curve C# the language was easy to learn, starting from a C/C++ background. The most surprising thing about C# and .NET was learning to not reinvent the wheel. Time after time I would start implementing some sort of plumbing, only to discover there was a .NET class for it.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I use html as a language
|
|
|
|
|
I am using dart for Flutter. It seems good enough.
Always Keep Smiling.
Yours Pankaj Nikam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...just in the big pool of C now?
Or is Apple no longer important enough?
I thought it was worse 2 years ago when they fell down to below 15% market share.. but aren't they back up to 17%?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Dear "Crustie",
ObjC is becoming "retired"
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
this is a Apple synonym for not in use anymore.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not on the list because of the number of other surveys saying Swift has largely overtaken ObjC.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|