|
maybe a none-conformist ?
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
Same question here too "Where is the None option?" I guess it should not be part of "Others"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simply the best.[^].
(and nope, I'm not a Roberto's relative).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
That looks very interesting. The books on Amazon were published in 2006. Is Lua still being maintained?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, version 5.2 is coming (see: http://www.lua.org/[^]).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Likes the above thread... :P
|
|
|
|
|
Using JScript/HTML for the UI and COM-objects that do the real work turned out to be a good combination for me.
Anyone else doing so?
|
|
|
|
|
For quick and dirty code tests I use the C/C++ interpreter CINT from Cern Root ()[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, how many of that large number of JavaScript users ACTUALLY use JavaScript, and how many are using a framework like jQuery instead?
I, for one, am using jQuery about 99% of the time instead of straight JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
JQuery is still JavaScript. Languages and frameworks are separate, no matter if you are using standard JavaScript or an advanced framework like JQuery.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I guess I worded that question badly. I didn't mean to imply that jQuery is not JavaScript. I guess I was more curious as to the percentage of people who use frameworks vs. the people who just write their JavaScript from scratch.
But, I suppose that is a question for a different poll ...
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, Boo is a statically typed, compiled language. What is it doing in this survey?
|
|
|
|
|
There's a rumor that they have natively implemented the Baconsort algorithm, hence the inclusion. Personally I don't believe it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's used in Ghostscript.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, strictly speaking they are not exactly the same thing, but really?
|
|
|
|
|
exactly my thought too...
|
|
|
|
|
The funny thing is - currently there are 270 votes for JavaScript and 30 for ECMAScript
|
|
|
|
|
And IronPython vs Python? And what about IronRuby vs Ruby?
So many questions...
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: OK, strictly speaking they are not exactly the same thing, but really?
My thought also.
Everybody SHUT UP until I finish my coffee...
|
|
|
|
|
I have moved to windows programming and do not use any scripting language.
|
|
|
|
|
I must be so last decade, I still compile and link my code.
You may be right
I may be crazy
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Both of us. On the other hand - interpreting is so 1970s. I like retro, but only on machines from that time.
"I have what could be described as the most wide-open sense of humor on the site, and if I don't think something is funny, then it really isn't." - JSOC, 2011
----- "Friar Modest never was a prior" - Italian proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. What if the compiling and linking happens so fast that you don't even notice it's happening, like with Java?
|
|
|
|