|
Combination of XML, Jelly (executable xml) and Java.
But it seems it didn't do to well.... a small number of companies hava developed there systems using it.
The net is not very resourceful.
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."
<< please vote!! >>
|
|
|
|
|
In free answers I see MFC, C, C++. Great! Is there Assembly script?
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Fr wrote: Is there Assembly script?
Yes![^]
|
|
|
|
|
Darling of web developers.
If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be.
Now put foundations under them.
|
|
|
|
|
Bourne Shell scripting is heavily used in Linux environment...
|
|
|
|
|
I thought "BASH" refers solely to bash.org[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I use that and other variants (sh, zsh ..) a lot more than all the other options in this list even in windows (cygwin or msys).
One of the latest work projects that required scripting involved taking a few thousand files that contained 3 different mamographic modalities to combine the ~200 cases into 2 modes to view on a mamographic workstation. The workstation will only recognize a case to be the same if 6 to 10 specific DICOM header parameters were the same (patient dob, patient id, exam date, exam uid ...). On top of that 1 modality was used in both sets and the workstation will not let you load the same image uid in more than 1 case so I had to generate a new uid for each image depending on what set it was in. Also most of the cases were a single breast but some were both breasts but the input fileset contained both breasts and many extra files that needed discarded. I thought about writing a C++ program to do all this but opted to write a few scripts because that would be easier to change quickly and since all the functionality for reading DICOM headers and inserting new values into the headers could be done using 3 or so GDCM applications with the command line I did not have to write any C++ code.. Of course I had to brush up my usage of awk, grep, xargs ...
John
|
|
|
|
|
Tcl/Tk is a widely used scripting language and has excellent buit-in GUI support. Why doesn't Code Project have an article section for Tcl/Tk? Nor does Tcl/Tk appear in the polling list of scripting languages used.
Regards 
N. Sharjith
|
|
|
|
|
Because no body asks questions about it.
If there are enough comments / questions etc., then a forum will probably get created. Like teh Regular Expressions forum was created not too long ago.
And if it ends up with tumble-weeds blowing through it (like the regular expressions forum) it will probably get uncreated, too. 
The lack of questions means that either Tcl/Tk users find it so perfect they never need to ask questions (unlikley) or hardly anyone who uses it come here. Ever.
I had never heard of it before (and probably never will again). 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."
|
|
|
|
|
Had there been a section created, I could have added a small tutorial on getting started. Now it seems it has become a chicken-egg problem
Regards
N. Sharjith
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I'm non-conformist. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
maybe a none-conformist ?
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
Same question here too "Where is the None option?" I guess it should not be part of "Others"... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simply the best.[^].
(and nope, I'm not a Roberto's relative).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
That looks very interesting. The books on Amazon were published in 2006. Is Lua still being maintained?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, version 5.2 is coming (see: http://www.lua.org/[^]).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Likes the above thread... :P
|
|
|
|
|
Using JScript/HTML for the UI and COM-objects that do the real work turned out to be a good combination for me.
Anyone else doing so?
|
|
|
|
|
For quick and dirty code tests I use the C/C++ interpreter CINT from Cern Root ()[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, how many of that large number of JavaScript users ACTUALLY use JavaScript, and how many are using a framework like jQuery instead?
I, for one, am using jQuery about 99% of the time instead of straight JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
JQuery is still JavaScript. Languages and frameworks are separate, no matter if you are using standard JavaScript or an advanced framework like JQuery.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I guess I worded that question badly. I didn't mean to imply that jQuery is not JavaScript. I guess I was more curious as to the percentage of people who use frameworks vs. the people who just write their JavaScript from scratch.
But, I suppose that is a question for a different poll ...
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, Boo is a statically typed, compiled language. What is it doing in this survey?
|
|
|
|
|
There's a rumor that they have natively implemented the Baconsort algorithm, hence the inclusion. Personally I don't believe it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
