System Admin

FirstPrevNext

Re: 10-connection limit on TCP/IP? 22-Dec-01 13:32 22-Dec-01 13:32  The article is not clear about which network level the limit has been applied to. It doesn't say that the limit is on TCP/IP. Maybe its only on products like IIS? Anybody actually verified this experimentally? Re: 10-connection limit on TCP/IP? Sean Cundiff22-Dec-01 16:50 Sean Cundiff 22-Dec-01 16:50  The article states a 10-user connection limit. Multiple connection from one user (on a single machine) count as one connection. Two users from one machine (i.e. a service running under the system account and a user) connecting count as two connections. IIS connections usually connect under a special anonymous account IUSR_<machine name>. So all anonymous web connections count as ONE connection. If you set up a secure website (login required) there will be a 10-user simultaneous connection limit. This sounds like a limit on the number of users, not a limit on the number of TCP/IP connections. Check out the section named "More Information". It specifically talks about having two windows sockets (socket=1/2 of a TCP/IP connection) count as one connection. -Sean ---- "Vigilance With Pride" Re: 10-connection limit on TCP/IP? Roger Wright17-Jan-02 19:57 Roger Wright 17-Jan-02 19:57  There is a ten-connection limit on the Workstation/Professional editions, but it doesn't apply to IIS connections. It is intended, I believe, to limit RAS users on small networks. As an interesting sidenote, I attended a training meeting in Phoenix with Microsoft when they were handing out copies of Win2K Beta3, and found myself chatting at lunch with one of the engineers. He mentioned in passing that the Workstation and Server products were essentially the same animal, but optimized in the Registry for different roles. That leads me to believe that a sufficiently clever person (myself not included) might be able to open up this restriction to accomodate his/her needs. It's worth a look... Advanced TCP Logger v3.52 18-Dec-01 4:24 18-Dec-01 4:24  Advanced TCP Logger v3.52 This program is a simple proxy server(port-mapper). It is an ideal tool for monitoring any network software or for researching network protocols. Log files with all traffic that has passed through this program are organized in a nice manner and can be saved in a separate folder. Info: http://www.ntndis.com/utilities/atcp2log.htm Download: http://www.ntndis.com/downloads/atcp2log.zip Main features: + Written in pure Windows API + Display of all transmitted data + Total transferred bytes counter + Command line options + Packet Viewer What is the purpose of this program? When can this program be used? When can you needed it? - If you want a simple proxy server (e.g. port mapper, port redirector). - It you want to count traffic. - If you want to save all the traffic packets in files, which you might want to analyze later. - If you want to study a format of network packages(protocols) used in any unknown programs. - If you are the developer of the network equipment or software and you have to solve problems from area "Embedded-Ethernet", "microWEB". I.e. generally IP-access to devices based on microcontrollers. - If you want to see "live" activity of the network protocols (e.g.: pop3, smtp, http, icq, irc). - You want to disassemble activity of scripts of any web-site and introduce automation into operations. Thanks, NT&NDIS Software Group. http://www.ntndis.com Re: Advanced TCP Logger v3.52 Mike Nordell28-Dec-01 2:14 Mike Nordell 28-Dec-01 2:14  So why don't you write a nice CP article about how it's done, how to use it and post some code instead of spamming here? Connect the iPaq with win2000 17-Dec-01 18:35 17-Dec-01 18:35  When try to test the connection to Windows CE device in the Platform Manager of embedded Vc environment, it gives the following error message: Unable to connect to the device. Please make sure you have installed the underlying transport (e.g., ActiveSync) and have a device connected. This problem may even occur when Microsoft ActiveSync already has a connection established to the Windows CE device at the same time. How to solve this. Re: Connect the iPaq with win2000 Mike Epprecht28-Jan-02 4:40 Mike Epprecht 28-Jan-02 4:40  Hi Have you tried to upgrade to ActiveSync 3.5? I had similar issues with 3.1. Cheers Mike Start>Run... Huh? User 842015-Dec-01 10:11 User 8420 15-Dec-01 10:11  I have something interesting going on... Operating System: Windows 2000 (SP2) Whenever I use Start>Run (or Windows + R) to run an app (usually "regedit", but it does the same with notepad or any application) it correctly launches the application but also displays the error message "Cannot find the file 'regedit' (or one of its components). Make sure the path and filename are correct and that all required libraries are available." After I press "OK" on this messagebox the "Run" dialog re-appears. The application IS running and IS useable. I've searched high and low on the internet (including Microsoft's site) to no avail. Apparently I'm the only person on the planet that this happens to. It is consistent (happens every time). If I use "Run" with a URL it works OK, it only does this with applications. This isn't a "show stopper" but it certainly is annoying. Any ideas?? Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? 15-Dec-01 10:37 15-Dec-01 10:37  really just ideas: what when you run dos-box? (cmd or command; i have no w2000 here) no strange default path? all ok when you run from dos-box? makes any delay? what is your %path%? the same with "c:\bootlog.txt"? (sorry, you already said no) the same with "start command"? t! Re: Start>Run... Huh? User 842015-Dec-01 11:01 User 8420 15-Dec-01 11:01  real name wrote: what when you run dos-box? (cmd or command; i have no w2000 here) From "Command Prompt" it runs OK. real name wrote: no strange default path? My current PATH variable is: %SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem real name wrote: makes any delay? No delay real name wrote: the same with "start command"? Same error about "command" and Dos box opens Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? 15-Dec-01 10:58 15-Dec-01 10:58  yeah: and the same with "c:\path\exename.exe"? t! Re: Start>Run... Huh? User 842015-Dec-01 11:02 User 8420 15-Dec-01 11:02  real name wrote: the same with "c:\path\exename.exe"? Same error. Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? Michael Dunn15-Dec-01 16:35 Michael Dunn 15-Dec-01 16:35  Could be a virus, or the remains of a virus that incompletely removed. Some Windows viruses associate themselves with .EXE files. Look in HKCR\.exe and HKCR\exefile and see if there's anything suspicious-looking there. --Mike-- http://home.inreach.com/mdunn/ "Not our fault we are intellectually superior to the rest of the office." -- Paul Watson in the Lounge, 12/12/2001 Sonork - 100.10414 AcidHelm Big fan of Alyson Hannigan. Re: Start>Run... Huh? User 842016-Dec-01 6:31 User 8420 16-Dec-01 6:31  Nothing "suspicious-looking"... ...but then again, I have no idea what I'm looking at in this area of the registry. One thing that strikes me as odd, is that I can't find any hint of this issue anywhere on the internet. It's kinda tricky to search for, but I haven't found a thing. I had also considered the possiblity of virii, but I would have thought somebody else would have noticed/reported it. Oh well, maybe it's a really, REALLY bad virus writer and I was his/her first victim and the virus died. Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? Michael Dunn16-Dec-01 15:18 Michael Dunn 16-Dec-01 15:18  Anything suspicious would be under HKCR\exefile\shell, especially shell\open\command. The default value of the command key should be "%1" %*. If there's an .exe name there, instead of %1, then it's likely a virus. --Mike-- My really out-of-date homepage "Not our fault we are intellectually superior to the rest of the office." -- Paul Watson in the Lounge, 12/12/2001 Sonork - 100.10414 AcidHelm Big fan of Alyson Hannigan. Re: Start>Run... Huh? User 842017-Dec-01 16:39 User 8420 17-Dec-01 16:39  Michael Dunn wrote: Anything suspicious would be under HKCR\exefile\shell, especially shell\open\command. The default value of the command key should be "%1" %*. If there's an .exe name there, instead of %1, then it's likely a virus. Nope, everything seems to look like it should. Any idea what executable is run when I use Start/Run? Nothing new gets added to the Applications or Processes in Task Manager. Is it part of explorer.exe?? Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? Michael Dunn24-Dec-01 18:21 Michael Dunn 24-Dec-01 18:21  Mike Mullikin wrote: Any idea what executable is run when I use Start/Run? That's part of Explorer (it's just a modeless dialog), not a separate EXE. --Mike-- My really out-of-date homepage "Why does anyone have a web page? Too much free time... not enough friends... justifying owning a computer." -- Noel Crane on Felicity Sonork - 100.10414 AcidHelm Big fan of Alyson Hannigan. Re: Start>Run... Huh? User 84207-Jan-02 16:13 User 8420 7-Jan-02 16:13  Somehow, some way, it has healed itself... This weekend after uninstalling a few un-needed apps (mostly shareware), accidentally un-installing MS Office and re-installing and patching MS Office my Start->Run sequence works properly again. I guess I'll never know EXACTLY what was wrong. Oh well... Mike Mullikin - Sonork 100.10096 "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." - Drew Carey Re: Start>Run... Huh? Peter Weyzen30-Jan-02 9:10 Peter Weyzen 30-Jan-02 9:10  My fixit to general problems like this -- it to run Norton's WinDoctor (part of Norton Utilities). It seems to just run thru and make sure things are "right". I strongly recommend it... Std - Handles Jens Kreiensiek14-Dec-01 4:36 Jens Kreiensiek 14-Dec-01 4:36  Hi All, I'm writing a service, that spawns several new processes. These new procs can either be gui apps or console apps. I redirect the std handles (stdout/stderr/stdin) via anonymous pipes as seen in well known msdn articles. After creating the new processes I wait for all my pipe-handles to become signaled. So far so good. Everything works fine with console apps, but if I start a gui app (e.g. notepad.exe), the pipe handle (stdout) gets signaled and a following ReadFile() blocks forever!. Okay, I tried to check for available data with PeekNamedPipe(). It's return value is always 0 (zero), so I skip the ReadFile(). But now the pipe handle becomes signaled ever and ever again and my cpu is at 100% with peeking the stdout pipe... I'm lost. What does Notepad.exe do with the std - handles? Any hints would be very appreciated!!! Frozen greetings from Germany, Jens Re: Std - Handles 567890123427-Dec-01 3:24 5678901234 27-Dec-01 3:24  Maybe the problem is that you try to talk with GUI applications by the same way as with console applications. They should be handled by the other way. After creating the process use WaitForInputIdle() to wait for it's initialization. FindWindow, EnumWindows etc. allow to get window handle, after this talk with this window using PostMessage. Check out also windows hooks (SetWindowsHookEx). There is nothing to do with pipes here. Re: Std - Handles Jens Kreiensiek28-Dec-01 1:37 Jens Kreiensiek 28-Dec-01 1:37  ...sure, but my problem is the strange behavior. I don't know whether I start a gui- or console application, so I can't differentiate between them. If a gui applicaton doesn't touch the std-handles, why do they behave in such a strange fashion? Re: Std - Handles 567890123429-Dec-01 19:10 5678901234 29-Dec-01 19:10  Maybe function IsGUIThread may help you. Re: Std - Handles Mike Nordell28-Dec-01 2:06 Mike Nordell 28-Dec-01 2:06  What about CreateProcess and waiting on the process handle? Actually, from your description I'm not entirely sure what you really want to do. /Mike An alternative to CButtonST? Rickard Andersson2012-Dec-01 10:41 Rickard Andersson20 12-Dec-01 10:41  I want to use CButtonST but as they say in the discussing board on the CButtonST page there is a bug with the transparency function. It looks corrupted sometimes and I don't like it! It's a bug according to the author and I ask you now if you know another class that can make hover event and transparent....??? ------------------------------ ©0d3 ©®4©k3® - That's me! ------------------------------

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 8-May-24 3:07 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...472473474475476477478479480481 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.