Survey Results

Too few articles to vote on ...

16-Dec-01 20:06

This is only for articles posted in the last 6 months.

cheers,
Chris Maunder

16-Dec-01 8:56

I have to admit that I haven't read any of these articles. I am sure they are all good ones, just that I am not interested in the topics selected. Maybe if there are more (100?) articles to vote on, I will be able to pick one or two that I already read.

Re: Too few articles to vote on ...

Chris Maunder16-Dec-01 20:07

Re: Too few articles to vote on ...

16-Dec-01 20:07

'OneLazyVoter' is right! Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

cheers,
Chris Maunder

17-Dec-01 2:52

Is he right

1) that there are too few articles to vote on or
2) that he is too lazy?

Wink | ;)

:-)

Nish Nishant11-Dec-01 0:42

11-Dec-01 0:42

I couldnt't vote so far as I havent had time to chk out the 20 articles.I havent read any of them. So it means havin to go through 20 of them and then voting

Nish

Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut

Chris Maunder11-Dec-01 3:18

11-Dec-01 3:18

Slacker!

cheers,
Chris Maunder

Nish Nishant11-Dec-01 16:10

11-Dec-01 16:10

Yeah

Nish

Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut

12-Dec-01 5:43

I guess we are all a bunch of slackers OMG | :OMG:

If you look at the list of articles there is a natural decreasing progression in popularity as you get to the bottom of the list.

It appears that like Nish, most of us have not reviewed all 20 articles but unlike Nish some may not be taking the time to do so either.

Hey Chris, how bout if you randomly mix up the list when it is displayed so that there is at least some random probability that those articles currently listed in slots 15-20 have a chance with us lazy bums.

Gotta go. I have some articles to review Poke tongue | ;-P

~Cliff

Chris Maunder12-Dec-01 6:13

12-Dec-01 6:13

Cliff Dabrowski wrote:
If you look at the list of articles there is a natural decreasing progression in popularity as you get to the bottom of the list.

That's because the list is sorted by votes Wink | ;)

cheers,
Chris Maunder

Maximilian Hänel12-Dec-01 10:27

Maximilian Hänel

12-Dec-01 10:27

Chris Maunder wrote:
That's because the list is sorted by votes

ROTFL

Max

13-Dec-01 8:11

OK So I assume that is your story and you are sticking to it Laugh | :laugh:

peterchen13-Dec-01 11:13

peterchen

13-Dec-01 11:13

so what about listing "weakest article first" on the Vote form? yes, the next time one of those fab competitions comes around Poke tongue | ;-P

George12-Dec-01 1:10

George

12-Dec-01 1:10

You can safely vote using the same tactics as everyone else: vote randomly on one of the articles listed as top of the list.

I wonder if the US president elections also follow that pattern...

Nish Nishant12-Dec-01 16:05

12-Dec-01 16:05

People vote that way???

Nish

Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain
www.busterboy.org
If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut

George12-Dec-01 17:19

George

12-Dec-01 17:19

Well, just compate the voting form and the results - at least until now it's a 100% match. The more article is listed on the top the more votes it gets.

It was similiar with the previous contest actually.

Nish Nishant12-Dec-01 17:22