|
I am not sure what the problem could be, but I am unable to bring up the IIS
web site properties. It won't come for the default web site as well as for
sub-webs. I have IIS 5.1 on XP Professional SP 1. I did install PHP earlier
today and am not sure if that might have caused any issues.
Any help is appreciated.
Now with my own blog - void Nish(char* szBlog);
My MVP tips, tricks and essays web site - www.voidnish.com
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like maybe PHP's isapi dll was not installed correctly. You could try reinstalling php maybe that would clear it up. If not you could try uninstalling php then IIS, reinstalling IIS and PHP.
Matt Newman
All rise for the honorable Judge Stone Cold Steve Austin - From Dilbert Episode 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
I was hopin' there'd be an easier way out
Yeah, it would be my last resort too but I couldn't find anything else.
Matt Newman
All rise for the honorable Judge Stone Cold Steve Austin - From Dilbert Episode 30
|
|
|
|
|
Hi to all,
i have developed a Remote Desktop application.
The server in a Windows Service.
When i restart the PC, i send ctrl+alt+del from client, and then i must send the authntication data.
I'm not able to capture the login screen.
Can anyone suggest me a function to capture the login screen, or how i can log in my system by-passing the windows login window (not auto-login)
Thanks in advance
Davide Vitiello
|
|
|
|
|
Some time I can't delete files (avi) and I get the well known message:
Cannot delete file abcd.avi. It is used by an another process. Try closing any process using this file and try again"
But unfortunately, I don't have no process using this file, and trying to delete it at windows boot up don't succeed any more.
Do anyone have a utility forcing deleting.
thanks,
H.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a handy program called "WhosLocking" that I found using Google a couple years ago. Once it's installed it's available in the context menu of explorer - right click on a file and select WhosLocking. It displays all processes that are currently using the target file, and double-clicking on a process name shuts it down. I've used it for a long time to get rid of files that I can't delete by normal means, but you have to use some judgement in using it. Some processes can't be stopped without making your system unstable, so you really have to know what you're doing. What I usually do is determine what program I want to shut down, locate it, and view its properties to see if it's something critical to Windows before I kill it.
Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
thx.
I tried it, but unfortunately, it pointed to the files as not locked by any process. In the other hand I still wasn't able to delete them because of the same reason as before.
Very strange for me. sort of voodoo
Haim
|
|
|
|
|
Ok,
I found the utilisty @ www.sysinternals.com.
It not only do delete any file, but is deleting it using DoD 5220.22-M secure file deleting requirement.
For all those who need it, it may be found at:
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/sdelete.shtml
Enjoy it
and thanks to Mark Russinovich for this great utility
Haim
|
|
|
|
|
simply go to dos and type this
forcedel /S <filename>
I know it works on win2k have not tried it on windows xp
Win32newb
"Programming is like sex, make one mistake and you have to support it for a long time"
|
|
|
|
|
I've had my Windows XP autoupdate downloading a critical patch every single day for the past week or so. I install the patch and the very next day it downloads again. I'm not 100% certain it's the same patch, but I'm pretty sure it is.
So I've come up with two possiblities.
1. I've got a virus that keeps erasing files from the critical patch, forcing it to re-downlad every day.
2. The critical patch is actually a virus, which re-downloads itself after the virus is removed by my scanner everyday.
I've scanned for viruses several times with the latest dat files and everything appears to be clean. So what's going on?
I also keep getting emails from system admins around the world saying my email was blocked because it contained unsafe attachments. The attachment is listed, but not contained in the email. These are all emails I haven't sent, to the best of my knowledge. They're to people and companies that aren't even in my address book. I can only assume it's someone I know who's got a virus on their machine that is sending itself out with my name on it, from their address book.
Any thoughts on these two issues would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Kevin Ranville
"Go to, I’ll no more on’t; it hath made me mad." - Hamlet
|
|
|
|
|
For a while, I got some emails from sysadmins saying my email was blocked. I traced it to my use of my un-obscured email address in some MS newsgroups.
One of the worms, I cannot recall which, was in the habit of harvesting email addresses from those newsgroups, and then using them in its emails. Quite nasty.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevnar wrote:
I've had my Windows XP autoupdate downloading a critical patch every single day for the past week or so. I install the patch and the very next day it downloads again. I'm not 100% certain it's the same patch, but I'm pretty sure it is.
I had a similar problem once. Check for the next couple of days to see if it is the same patch. Find the Knowledge Base article related to it (KB999999 number will be in the title), go to the Knowledge Base and download the patch. Manually install it and the problem should be resolved.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So i had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote:
go to the Knowledge Base and download the patch. Manually install it and the problem should be resolved.
Okay, it turns out it is the same patch everyday. KB835732. I installed it manually from microsoft.com, but it's still downloading itself everyday.
Perhaps I need a better virus scanner, or maybe a better firewall.
"Go to, I’ll no more on’t; it hath made me mad." - Hamlet
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a Norton Antivirus 2003/2004 software, try
updating the virus definitions. Norton Antivirus will
detect any new viruses or the virus that keeps on re-download the same patch. If you don't have this software,
I suggest you purchase it. Better than any virus scanners.
I also had encountered the same problem as you. But with Norton Antivirus(updated Virus Definitions) , it automatically detected and cleared the annoying virus which keep repeatedly download the same patch.
|
|
|
|
|
My son's computer runs XP Home and has corrupted the SYSTEM registry so it won't boot.
For reasons I won't detail I can't use the files from Windows\repair as described in KB article 307545.
What I want to know is: if I do a reinstall over the existing system will I subsequently be able to recover the backed-up registry files as described in Parts Two and Three of that article?
Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
The opinions expressed in this communication do not necessarily represent those of the author (especially if you find them impolite, discourteous or inflammatory).
|
|
|
|
|
I really dont know under which category this post should belong...My apologies....
As a company's intern, I was asked to research on this to see if I can do it. Basically, I am suppose to find a way for the network adminstrator to detect ALL printers connected to client machines and store the info (client machine name, printer model, etc) in a database. This includes all USB and parallel printers.
I'm not really sure how to do this. My boss suggests using a "logon script" that automatically detect printers when logging on. For instance, when a Windows user logs on to the domain, some script should try to detect all locally connected printers on the client's machine and report that back to the central database.
So my question is "Is this possible?". And if so, what programming/scripting language should I use? Perl, PHP, etc? Can I even do this using a .NET language?
|
|
|
|
|
I think it depends on the client machines and the exact requirements. The API of EnumPrinters and EnumPrinterConnections will be of use to you. YOu can use them to enumerate printers on remote clients - so in theory it could all be done from one machine (although you'd need administrator rights to log into the remote machines and do it.)
On a domain, in theory you could query the domain for all machines currently connected (not sure if this is possible or how to do it... but it seems possible), then for each machine, call EnumPrinters and EnumPrinterConnections to get all the printers.
The logon script idea would probably work, too, assuming you have a way of getting that information back to the central database or wherever.
As for what language to use... probably straight Win32 C or C++ would be your best bet, since most of this will be calling Windows APIs.
Sometimes I feel like I'm a USB printer in a parallel universe.
|
|
|
|
|
We recently upgraded our network from an Exchange 2000 installation to an Exchange 2003 installation. This was done as a migration, not an upgrade. Exchange 2003 was installed on a brand new server, installed on to the network, mailboxes were migrated to it, then the original Exchange 2000 box was de-commisioned.
For some reason, when viewing posts in the public folders, the 'From' field of all posts seem to be lost.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Kyosa Jamie Nordmeyer - Cho Dan
Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I need help with an application being executing on a remote disk that "disappear" when I disable the Network Connection...
The same application tested with the debugger give back the error "0xC0000006: In Page Error.".
In the MSDN I've found the article Q172530 (Deleted UNC Connection While In Use Causes an In-Page Error") and as far as I understood the problem here is in the redirector... but this problem shoudln't have already been fixed on NT 3.51???
I think I'm close to the solution, but I would really appreciate some help or workaround.
I'm running on W2K Professional SP4.
Thanx guys,
Fabio
|
|
|
|
|
Windows loads your program into RAM lazily, on-demand. When it loses the connection to the network drive, and your application tries to load a page that wasn't already in RAM, Windows has no choice but to throw an exception. Note that Windows also discards pages that haven't been touched recently if you're above your minimum working set size.
To force an image launched from across the network to be loaded into RAM before being executed, pass the /SWAPRUN:NET option to the linker. You can also add it to an existing binary using editbin.
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, thanx for your precious help!
Rgds,
Fabio
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone as ideas on how to develop an aplication that block all tcp/ip ports with exceptions for particular ports, on a w2k or Xp system.
|
|
|
|
|
Has anyone here seen a problem where if you set a port of a Cisco 355o switch to only communicate at 100Mb Full-duplex that it will not allow NICs attached to it that are set to Auto-negitiate to actualy run at 100Mb Full-duplex? It seems like setting the port staticly shuts off it's ability to negotiate.
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the a**hole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
|
|
|
|
|
Our domain controller (singular, whitebox) died this morning.
Any idea how long our cached logons (Windows XP) will keep working?
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
