Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Hmm... Navin26-Jan-04 2:22 Navin 26-Jan-04 2:22  So who's the poor sap that wrote in "FORTRAN"? "I'd be up a piece if I hadn't swallowed my bishop." Mr. Ed, playing chess Re: Hmm... Carlos Antollini26-Jan-04 8:58 Carlos Antollini 26-Jan-04 8:58  Where are the ckeck of LOGO and QBASIC??? Carlos Antollini Do you know piFive[^] ? Re: Hmm... KevinHall28-Jan-04 9:43 KevinHall 28-Jan-04 9:43  I think we need a LOGO.NET! Re: Hmm... Carlos Antollini28-Jan-04 10:20 Carlos Antollini 28-Jan-04 10:20  it's true, but sometimes we are forgeting the following: Cobol.Net[^] hFortran.NET[^] Regards Carlos Antollini Do you know piFive[^] ? Re: Hmm... Maxwell Chen28-Jan-04 15:49 Maxwell Chen 28-Jan-04 15:49  Or Lego.NET ? Maxwell Chen CListCtrl??? dabs26-Jan-04 0:54 dabs 26-Jan-04 0:54  OK what happened to CListCtrl? Is no one using that anymore? Not good enough to be entered to the survey anymore? Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beierhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput! Re: CListCtrl??? Ian Darling26-Jan-04 2:20 Ian Darling 26-Jan-04 2:20  dabs wrote: OK what happened to CListCtrl? Is no one using that anymore? Not good enough to be entered to the survey anymore? It got boring. And in this survey, it's almost a sensible answer - where's the fun in that? -- Ian Darling "The different versions of the UN*X brand operating system are numbered in a logical sequence: 5, 6, 7, 2, 2.9, 3, 4.0, III, 4.1, V, 4.2, V.2, and 4.3" - Alan Filipski Re: CListCtrl??? Uwe Keim28-Jan-04 3:02 Uwe Keim 28-Jan-04 3:02  It's like the redesign of a website: Most companies do it only because the current design is getting boring to THEM. But to their customers it would be helpful to stay what they used to. So is with <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vclib/html/_MFC_CListCtrl.asp" style="text-decoration:underline">CListCtrl</a> (for which I actually voted here): Just because it's getting boring to you/us, this is NO reason to get rid of -- - Free Windows-based CMS: www.zeta-software.de/enu/producer/freeware/download.html - See me: www.magerquark.de - MSN Messenger: uwe_keim@hotmail.com Working with VB6 on an old project Stephan Hoppe25-Jan-04 21:30 Stephan Hoppe 25-Jan-04 21:30  It's soooo terrible to work on this project with VB 6 . I miss the inheritance, ADO.NET, reflection, C# - just everything. Thank god, that this is the last version which is developed in VB 6. The next version will be written in C#. VB.net NormDroid25-Jan-04 21:17 NormDroid 25-Jan-04 21:17  Looks like the transition from VB to VB.net is too big, people are probably moving to C#? I am that is Re: VB.net Paul Watson26-Jan-04 5:55 Paul Watson 26-Jan-04 5:55  Or just too ashamed to check it... I did not check it on a technicality i.e. Others in the office do the VB.NET projects, the boss knows I have alergic reactions to it. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass South Africa Christopher Duncan quoted: "All Corvettes are red. Everything else is just a mistake." Crikey! ain't life grand? Einstein says... Re: VB.net Gronalund26-Jan-04 8:08 Gronalund 26-Jan-04 8:08  And there are probably many people running VB6 still, as only.. at least my friends do.. :/ Re: VB.net p daddy27-Jan-04 0:24 p daddy 27-Jan-04 0:24  Gronalund wrote: And there are probably many people running VB6 still Yep, just to test the activex controls they've written in mighty VC6 Re: VB.net Tad McClellan28-Jan-04 3:57 Tad McClellan 28-Jan-04 3:57  Something that I think we as programmers forget is that Programming is a business. Either you work in a cost center and you have to minimize you cost while adding the most value to the business, or you work in a profit center (as I do) and your focus is on the P&L. VB6 is here to stay for a while because from a business perspective it doesn't add a lot of value to a business to change technology just because you can. Especially if you end up with the same application you have in older technology. Re: VB.net Wackatronic30-Jan-04 15:45 Wackatronic 30-Jan-04 15:45  The place that hired me as a consultant was afraid to go to .NET so they wanted everything done in VB6 so that their mainframe programmers could eventually figure the code out. However, I have been making sure that I fully qualify everything so that it makes it easier to convert to .NET in the future. But I must say I have been learning C# since January 2004 and I'm pretty well hooked. Fear is the mind killer. so most of you have everything to worry about, know don't you! Re: VB.net Jon Newman26-Jan-04 14:15 Jon Newman 26-Jan-04 14:15  See, deep down, you are a programmer Jonathan 'nonny' Newman blog.nonny.com [^] Re: VB.net Steven Campbell26-Jan-04 8:27 Steven Campbell 26-Jan-04 8:27  I moved from VB6 to C#, because I knew that the .NET learning curve was big enough that I may as well throw myself in the deep end and learn a new language in the process. I'm glad I did, and I must say that I prefer it over VB.NET (just slightly). That said, I use VB.NET too, and the VB6 projects that I know of are migrating to VB.NET. So, no I think most VB6 people will stay with VB language. Re: VB.net J.B26-Jan-04 13:00 J.B 26-Jan-04 13:00  I contract therefore I do what I am told... personally I prefer C#. Re: VB.net NormDroid26-Jan-04 20:45 NormDroid 26-Jan-04 20:45  I would contract if I knew I 6month+ of VB work lined up, I'd rather be unemployed I am that is Re: VB.net Anonymously28-Jan-04 6:48 Anonymously 28-Jan-04 6:48  J.B wrote: I contract therefore I do what I am told... I consult therefore I tell others what to do ... I will tell them different things, depending on day of the week and my mood at the time.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 4-May-24 22:25 Refresh ᐊ Prev123

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.