|
P.S. Not really as a response to you, but as further thought your response have provoked.
Regarding "green great dragon": If the writer has established "great dragon" as a thing, then I can see "green great dragon" being acceptable.
The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn’t that make “great dragon” more of a title than an attribute, like in “grand master”? Just a thought.
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, kinda maybe. But more like [hot dog] and [ugly sweater] act as nouns rather than as a noun with an adjective.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
It just sounds wrong when you say it, even though I was previously unaware of this rule.
|
|
|
|
|
I know. But I can English with the best of 'em.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. While reading I started thinking of a counter example and couldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Tactile versus visual? Objective versus subjective?
Large, fluffy, red ... The label also says Large (L); but makes no reference to fluffy or red; though fluffy might be implied in the material and washing instructions. "Non-white" is implied if told to wash separately with like colors.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
modified 1-Dec-23 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: As I was lay awake this morning
In terms of two people speaking to each other...
The real value is in the word 'trapped'. The rest provides only limited value in the context to the other person. After all for example if it was small versus large would that really change anything?
But if I was the other person I would be more curious as to why you were laying in bed wearing a sweater like that in the first place. And if you were not in fact wearing it then why were you thinking about it in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing you've never lain awake in the morning. Hmm?
|
|
|
|
|
It was a joke of course.
But yes I have lain awake many mornings.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever order sounds most like a band name is correct.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Oddly enough, I had Soft, White Underbelly on my mind yesterday. 
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I'm trapped inside a large, red, fluffy sweater ...
On a cold, dark, winter evening, with my soft, furry, ginger cat 😺 on my lap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it depends on what the word "fluffy" is describing.
If it's related to material, then it's a large red fluffy sweater. It's made of something fluffy, but it could be wool, cotton, nylon, etc. It could also simply be referring the class of objects known as "fluffy sweaters".I've got a large red fluffy sweater and a small green fluffy sweater. In this case, dropping the "large", I could still say "a red fluffy sweater"!
If it's the shape, then it's a large fluffy red sweater.I've got a large fluffy red sweater and a small furry green sweater. If it's opinion, then it's a fluffy large red sweater. This use would indicate the speaker is emphasizing the fluffiness."Is this a nice large red sweater?"
"Well, it's definitely a fluffy large red sweater!" Of course, rules are made to be broken, so the size-color order can be overridden if you're specifically referring to "large sweaters".I've several large sweaters, but my green large sweater is being washed, so I'll wear my fluffy red large sweater.
modified 1-Dec-23 20:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At least you are keeping the indefinite article.
Leaving out definite or indefinite article from sentences gets my goat 
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
It's definitely an article of clothing.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that would be "indefinitely".
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
For an indefinite period, sure. Maybe only until the asteroid hits.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this quote in the comments on an article about "AI" failing an IQ test:
Considering what actual stupidity has brought us to, I'm not at all cheered by the idea that now we’re going to add in artificial stupidity with a lot of money behind it.
|
|
|
|
|
That's how it gets you, playing dumb while keeping track of everything. At some point in the future WHAM! we're all slaves to the artificial overmind.
Maybe the Terminator movies got it right? Maybe there is no avoiding SkyNet?
|
|
|
|
|
It's the time of the year when music stream send you your yearly summary.
My top 7 artists :
Pete Namlook
Marillion.
ABBA (because of the Mama Mia! soundtrack)
Atom(tm)
Heilung
Genesis
Moby
And a crap ton of other artists.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
I thought you were going to tell us you mastered the guitar or something.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
My report was:
The Warning
The Pretty Reckless
Wet Leg
Faun
Battlesnake
But this doesn't reflect what I listened to on YouTube and my ripped CDs which I listen to more often. It would be cool (Ok unpopular) if the stats could be compiled from all sources.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
