|
At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything as do many today, and definitely doesn't get its feeling hurt (though it seemed to when I told it it was a fancy expert system with lots of memory and storage space) HAH
|
|
|
|
|
Member 8002925 wrote: At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything...
If it 'learns' from humans, it will.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
jeron1 wrote: Member 8002925 wrote: At last it doesn't get violent in a discussion about nearly anything...If it 'learns' from humans, it will.
James P Hogan: The Two Faces of Tomorrow[^] is a good read.
Don't worry about the publication year. The AI parts could have been authored last year. Most younger people will be surprised how little things have changed in the AI sector in 40+ years.
|
|
|
|
|
Old saying -
"Switch off the brain. Then switch on AI".
|
|
|
|
|
Waht auobt wehn the lrettes are regnarrad?
|
|
|
|
|
That's DAI - Dyslexic AI
They're working on it!
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
AI is just a bunch of nested if-statements 
|
|
|
|
|
|
It isn't intelligent, if you believe that nonsense then you fall for marketing. It does not deduce, nor produce. It repeats, based on input - and garbage in..
It can be used to make nice pictures; just don't expect any deep philosophic insights yet.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably more appropriate to note that the AI application you were using was stupid, in your opinion. To consider that AI has great potential is easy, all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential. 
Like all things technology related, there is the good and the bad. Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous.
Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed!! Fro what it ism, firs tof all you have to be a good "question asker" as the AI doesn't have intuitive contextual abilities. that said, it (for the work....yes real work) I have done' with it, its pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: all my life, it has been said that I am 90% potential.
American? Maybe they wear that smile because they're told to. If you're above 40%, they're either a salesmen, or a politician. If you think 90%, then boy, you're gullible.
theoldfool wrote: Like everything on the Internet, it is too easy to be anonymous.
Which it also was before the internet. That's just temporary though, as everyone is on Facebook and Twitter.
theoldfool wrote: Dreams are free. Goals are expensive.
You just used a lot of words, and said nothing.
Hello 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello back to you. We rarely agree, but that is OK.
(I have never been a member of facebook and such. )
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
theoldfool wrote: We rarely agree, but that is OK.
I never asked you to.
theoldfool wrote: I have never been a member of facebook and such.
Then you are as crazy as me, sir. Everyone nowadays does that?
I salute you.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not on Facebook or twitter
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Terress wrote: GIGO....
This same concept holds true for all human "intelligence" too. 
The world may just get into more & worse trouble, since AI can speed up stupidity. 
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: This same concept holds true for all human "intelligence" too. 
Which explains being "woke"
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Not here.
GISO (garbage in salad out)
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
The term "Artificial Intelligence" had a specific meaning starting in the 1950s. The term now however is used as a marketing term.
The products and attempts (or dreams) of monetization is hoping to build on the claim that this is somehow moving towards that reality.
I see no evidence of that.
I consider the best demonstration of what real AI would look like is in the movie "I, Robot" with Will Smith. He is going to work and a robot is running down the street with a purse. Avoiding people and cars. Will Smith thinks it is nefarious but it turns out the woman that owns the robot forgot her purse (with medicine?) and the robot went to retrieve it.
And as depicted in the moving that robot even then did not fit the model of being actually intelligent.
So myself I will wait to get excited until I see real common place behavior like that.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: The term "Artificial Intelligence" had a specific meaning starting in the 1950s. The term now however is used as a marketing term.
Hence, upvoted.
Intelligence isn't in the product; it does not think, deduce, rationalize, it replicated garbage from the internet. Good in making pictures, not good in conversations.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I've thought about the same thing. If I want to have AI write a subroutine, I have to instruct AI's every step. I could say "Make a web page", but what would be the default output? This is why I think writing code for specific purposes is no different than writing it on your own. Sure, AI can make something generic, but if you want software developed, you still have to designate each instruction on your own.
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: Having a conversation where "AI" is the mediator
Do you think you can tell?
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh ... but do you have to keep explaining the same thing again and again?
|
|
|
|
|
Certainly sometimes. Even for those that one might think should know better.
Actually newer studies seem to suggest that correcting someone directly might reinforce the incorrect information in their minds.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
