|
Round here (Watford) the RM have taken on an Amazon delivery contract, as there are too few Amazon drivers. This means there are too few RM drivers and post is now delivered every two WEEKS unless you fill (or a close neighbour) fill-in a complaint form. So even 1st class is delayed, as are NHS appointment letters etc etc.
"When I were a lad" you'd get multiple deliveries a day, even Saturdays.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Amazon uses USPS occasionally but for the most part we still get the Amazon trucks which is good because we rely on them heavily in this house.
Part of it is my anxiety is such that I can't safely drive anymore most of the time. Been a struggle since 2017 when I went mad.
I do wish Amazon would collect and reuse boxes. We've taken to paying for two recycling bins and I feel guilty about it.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Royal Mail Track system says "we've picked it up it" and "we'll update this status when we have delivered it".
It's so weird because every time you mention the Royal Mail Track system or Royal Post Service I think, "is he in the US?" 
Your system must've bee written by the same people who wrote the USPS (united states postal service).
Ours does the same thing.
Here's a story I've told before.
1. Sent a package via USPS got tracking.
2. 2 weeks later the package still said, "picked up".
3. I went into local post office and talked to the Post Master General -- sounds like a big deal but apparently he was just the "shift manager".
4. I asked Post Master, "Is my package lost?" He looked it up on his terminal by tracking number and said, "looks like it's in the system".
5. "Yes, I paid for tracking and I haven't seen anything."
6. PM: Points to a huge stack packages. "Look at all those packages we have to keep track of -- we can't keep track of every single one."
7. My eyes bugged out.
8. PM: "Oh, it'll show up sooner or later. Let us know if you still don't know about it in a month."
9. Many days later, the status did indeed update: "delivered"
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: PM: Points to a huge stack packages. "Look at all those packages we have to keep track of -- we can't keep track of every single one."
United Parcel Service (UPS) and FedEx do it for every one of their packages. Just sayin'.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: United Parcel Service (UPS) and FedEx do it for every one of their packages.
I know. That's why Post Master's statement was so freaking mind-boggling!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Heh, I'm waiting for a package being shipped via UPS. Here's the tracking info they provide:
Friday, October 20
12:25 AM Package left the carrier facility.
Thursday, October 19
10:15 PM Package arrived at a carrier facility.
9:26 PM Package left the carrier facility.
9:08 PM Package arrived at a carrier facility.
5:11 PM Package left the carrier facility.
4:04 PM Package arrived at a carrier facility.
Carrier picked up the package.
Talk about totally useless information.
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Leyshon wrote: And whilst I'm on it, here's another that is becoming very prevalent around this area. Drivers now seem to think it is too much trouble to turn the wheel on their power steering car to turn right properly.
Oh, yes, this to the n'th power. Also, people driving micro cars who think they're 12 feet wide and have to drive 3 feet from the kerb straddling the centre line.
Don't get me started on drivers who simply pull a U-turn when there is traffic approaching from both directions, expecting everyone else to stop to accommodate them.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Trouble is, it';s pretty much accurate: the higher the traffic density, the more likely a jam is, because one set of brake lights going on, slows X cars down in response, and they slow a further Y, and "slowness wave" propagates back through the traffic getting slower and slower until some traffic does stop, even momentarily. Which makes more people stop, and you rapidly build a jam for no reason other than the amount of traffic.
It's weirdly beautiful to watch in models, but frustrating if you are driving!
I don’t know if this happens in the UK but here in the states I’ve frequently been in traffic jams where it turns out the actual accident was on the other side of the median (otherwise known as traffic going in the opposite direction) and the only reason you’ve had to sit in an hour long backup is because of all the rubberneckers who come to a complete stop so
|
|
|
|
|
I just had to correct someone that claimed they "researched" something online.
I told them they consumed content online.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Yes! It pisses me off when people don't know the difference between "search" and "research". You use Google to do a "search" and you do "research" in a lab, or a library with tons of books and equipment and many, many hours of hard work.
A doctor I went to see once had a coffee mug that said: "Don't confuse my medical degree with your Google search!"
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Hardly anyone does research. Almost everyone, including most STEM professionals, have to decide whom and what to trust. And it's getting harder, because it has become increasingly clear that a lot of sources are full of crap. It's been obvious in politics, journalism, and economics for a long time. But even "trust the science" has now become a red flag for "you'd better look into this yourself and try to figure out if it's propaganda". Your arrogant doctor with his mug is no different. I doubt he ever takes the time to evaluate what his cohort, guild organization, or guild journal tells him.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: Almost everyone, including most STEM professionals, have to decide whom and what to trust
That's scary! You are describing an almost religious society in which each one has their own beliefs and there are no proof based facts. "Alternative facts" are echoing in my mind 
Greg Utas wrote: Your arrogant doctor with his mug is no different.
I have other doctor friends and I know they read medical journals and try to keep up with what's new in their field. I'd like to believe that the one with the mug was doing the same... You may say I'm a dreamer. But I'm not the only one
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
The essence of science is the evolution of "proof-based facts". Around 1900, Rutherford spoke of the "death of physics"--that it had all been pretty much figured out. Soon afterwards, Einstein showed up. There is often a general consensus based on what is currently "known", but even that is subject to manipulation. Unfortunately, more and more areas are getting politicized.
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot find a reference for Rutherford speaking about "death of physics", so I cannot know in what context to put it. He should have been however quite aware of the Ultraviolet catastrophe[^] and expect it to be solved somehow. More recently, I know of someone else who proclaimed the "end of history", so maybe we can generalize, paraphrasing Mark Twain: news of any domain death are greatly exaggerated 
Greg Utas wrote: Unfortunately, more and more areas are getting politicized.
I don't think it's so much politicization as flooding with information we ("we" as society, not "we" as individuals) cannot handle. If you have time to spare, you can see my ideas in more detail here: The Third Cultural Revolution[^].
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
You were probably wrong.
RESEARCH:
NOUN
the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions:
"we are fighting meningitis by raising money for medical research"
VERB
investigate systematically:
"she has spent the last five years researching her people's history"
"the team has been researching into flora and fauna"
When one reads a web page and directly uses the information found, that is consumption.
When one reads numerous pages, especially when not all agree, and forms logical conclusions based upon what was read, that is research.
|
|
|
|
|
It was an article from thedailybeast.com
I wasn't wrong.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
"off of"
Often when reading a novel, if I come across this grammatical turd, I dump the book and never go near that author again.
I can say no more, I could explode with anger just seeing the words in my own post.
So old that I did my first coding in octal via switches on a DEC PDP 8
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't really bother me, but I relegate the writer to an illiterate when I read could/would/should/may/might of.
|
|
|
|
|
Clumpco wrote: "off of"
Also the closely related misuse of "should of" or "could of" as in "I should of gone home early".
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Raw wrote: What's something that drives only you up the wall, while other people are just fine with it?
I don't have any pet peeves regarding things of that nature. Mine are lies or online peeps being arrogant with nothing to back it up except feeling brave behind a keyboard. Online peeps just seem to laugh it off. I probably need to get out more and stay off the Internet.
Oh, fake people annoy me too. And smokers/stoners.
Steve Raw wrote: Do they think I'll inadvertently forget to return it and mistakenly bring it home with me? If they're going to take my golf ball away, why not rip the golf club from my hands and punch me in the face?
So, you know... I hear prozac works wonders.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Nance and Kevin Burkhart.
Pretentious narcissists with microphones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
News reporters who misuse words. Their tool is language, they ought to learn how to use it correctly.
I have lots of examples in French I hear all the time, but translate poorly. But one that'll work fine to illustrate is the abuse of the word "literally". I still vividly remember a report, from years ago, about some minister who got angry while parliament was in session and went on a tirade, and we, the viewers, were told he "literally exploded".
No.
No, he didn't. It would've been a very different story had that been the case.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: some minister who got angry while parliament was in session and went on a tirade, and we, the viewers, were told he "literally exploded".
World could be a better place if some ministers "literally exploded"
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
i happen to have gotten a hole in one on that windmill and a nifty little plastic trophy for which i was most proud .
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
