|
My main browser is Vivaldi but I do have to switch every now and then. There's a financial site I use and the only browser that lets me login is Edge. Chrome, Firefox and Vivaldi just don't work there. Seems weird that Edge will work but Chrome and Vivaldi won't. Aren't they all based upon Chromium?
|
|
|
|
|
Last 10 years i used Opera and I'm not going to change it yet
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to hear someone mentioning Opera.
After switching to Brave (again) from FF, I'm starting to get settled in, but I'm going to check out Opera and see how it runs on :
* Linux desktop,
* iPad Pro
* windows 10
I wonder if it has features for "sharing" open tabs like other browsers? Probably does.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean as my default, regular work web browser?
I think the last time I switched in that sense was in 2004, when I started to use Firefox. Before that, I had used Opera for a couple of years after Netscape died when AOL bought them off.
Never had any serious issue with Firefox, certainly much less than with any other browser pretender. Only issue that I encountered was that when they changed their API for browser extensions, a couple of add-ons didn't work anymore and the re-designed ones, using the new API, never created the same functionality. But that's where Waterfox (Classic) came to the rescue... 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to this post I went poking around on a practically full system SSD while describing in my mind a scenario where I would begin thinking about cloning it, after backup, and discovered that IE11 was still coming about. So today (that's right, she's on autopilot) I went to Control Panel/Programs and Apps/Windows Features and things(sp?) and unticked it's box.
So in answer to your actual question, once in a blue moon.
|
|
|
|
|
i've stuck w/ Edge as i am fond of the "Collections" feature .
|
|
|
|
|
This below post started as a question, then I gave it one last try, now it is a rant...
I am looking for a Linux app for examining images (BMP). I feel that my requirements are modest, but no application I have tried meets the following. I need to visually compare minuscule differences in sequence of images.
* Zoom in as elephant, I need pixels as big as peas
* Zoom in without filtering, I must see the original pixels
* Maintain the zoom as I flick through the images (am I only one in 8 billion who needs this?)
I have tried these: eog, nomacs, pinta, feh, mirage, ristretto.
Most of them zoom out always. Nomacs, starts with a promise, but zooms out to 100% randomly. Mirage just crashes. Many of them filter the large image.
Suggestions welcome. Thanks.
After several days of frustration, I just now tried qview. That one works. Elephant!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Could you just zoom part of your window and then look at the images in that area?
If that will work, you go to
Settings...Accessibility...
click the Zoom item to turn it on and then set the area where zoom will be in effect.
See this snapshot[^].
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks but... this one also filters, and the "Full screen" zoom was quite hard to escape back from. I need like 20x zoom
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
megaadam wrote: am I only one in 8 billion who needs this?
To be fair far, far fewer than that will do anything with images except just look at them as some media site presents it. And probably of those won't be looked at at all.
Then of that vast subset only a much smaller subset are those that do create/edit images. And those are going to be looking at the macro scale.
megaadam wrote: visually compare minuscule differences in sequence of images...Maintain the zoom as I flick through the images
I have never seen a request like that before.
Curious as to the use case.
Matter of fact when one says "minuscule" I wonder what you do with different color graduations? Say just one bit difference in the blue of one pixel? Seems unlikely that you could visually see that.
Myself I would expect programmatically it to be easier. I would probably write code to read the image, perhaps provide a bounding region, then compare the pixels via the bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I compare pixels instead of "looking" at them.
(I have an app that "corrects" pictures by rejecting any pixel that doesn't match a given palette, and "fills" the hole with the last valid pixel (on that "row"). Effectively "erases" things you don't account for).
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: far fewer than that
Far fewer than one in 8 billion? You make me feel lonely. With 8 billion humans on Earth, where do you find all the other image viewers? Or am I far fewer than one? Well, that would explain it.
The use-case is OCR, un-italicisizing italic non-latin script, to improve the OCR-output. Have I done it programmatically? Yes, I have. The subjective assessment of the images is just a complement to that.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
We have almost exactly that workflow in one of our products. We use it to examine camera images during a calibration process.
You wouldn't believe the gyrations I went through in our UI trying to display simple pixel-accurate bitmaps in WPF. I finally gave up and used an embedded WinForms control.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you've found a solution. I'm going to have a look at qview as well, it seems nice.
I think irfanview might also be able to do what you want. It has a compare images function which can zoom in and lock the zoom level.
|
|
|
|
|
She says the satellite bug is crazy. (7)
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Not to sure about the last three letters being a bug ?
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bard bug
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
"She says ..." covers it I think. (Trying really hard not to hint here, you understand.)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I'll take it...
She says (sounds like)
the satellite LUNA
bug TIC(k)
is crazy.
LUNATIC
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
YAUT! I was nearly going to use a name instead of "she", and add a couple of commas, after the name and bug. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was "erratic"
Erra being a Portuguese weather satellite.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: When asked about the pushback from developers against working out how to get users spending early in the development process, Riccitiello said: "It's a very small portion of the gaming industry that works that way, and some of these people are my favourite people in the world to fight with -- they're the most beautiful and pure, brilliant people. They're also some of the biggest f***ing idiots.
Now, remind me, who's the "f***ing idiot" again?
Yet another CEO treating customers like they're ATM machines.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
