|
I'll keep searching, thanks for trying at least. As an aside, just found out there's something called QLED now... which isn't as nice as OLED but maybe there's a 4K version under $4k... 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: I wish I had saved the box for it, cause I've no idea what the name of the model is.
I can't quite believe I am writing this, but wouldn't you expect to find a model number on the back of the monitor somewhere, if not the front?
|
|
|
|
|
|
DO you think that monitor warrants such a price, or you think they charge so much just because they know that the buyers have deep pockets?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Presumably, there's people willing to pay that! It is marked a s "professional" monitor and seems to be geared towards professional video editing. I haven't checked the specs, but maybe it has very precise color controls that make it worth it to the right customer.
But seeing as one could get a 4k OLED TV for much less, that might be an option, too if the refresh rate and display quality are acceptable.
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
k5054 wrote: But its currently out of stock. It also has a 4K price tag, so there's that as well.
Ha ha ha. Be careful what you wish for. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Better off getting a small OLED TV, it is far cheaper with very little difference, as you do not need that level of color accuracy unless working with video editing software.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
That's the route I'm gonna do. Don't really play games on my laptop and the switch, ps5, etc. is in the living room anyway. They can use an OLED, but for work and coding just going with IPS.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 4k 27"IPS LG display. I would not go back to TN or VA. You will see the difference!
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
VA & TN was left off. ref: Panel Types: IPS vs TN vs VA vs OLED[^]
OLED will have burn-in issues. Being a programmer, our screens tend to be static, so this is an issue. I have an OLED tablet and played the same game for 3 years on it. I can see the UI burned in and can't get rid of it.
IPS is the best choice for Clarity and viewing angle.
4K is good if you want to see a lot of code on your screen. With Visual studio I have the size of text in my code window set to 90% and on a 4K screen, I can see 130 lines of code at a time.
The question is size and width. What can your eyes handle. for 4K, 27" is good, 32" is best. If you have 2, then that is 8K. You could get one that rotates for your main screen, then you will have even more lines of code at a time.
An alternative is to go 49"ultra wide @ 5K or DQHD 5120x1440 with an aspect Ratio: 32:9. That is like having 2 x 27"side by side without bezels. Best with 1800R curve (ref: 1000R vs. 1500R vs. 1800R Curved Monitors - What’s the difference? Which one is better?[^]). Now, this allows for a lot more. I have one, it's 1800R, and for me, it is like having 3 screens in one - no juggling windows on the screen, they're all there. I can have VS in the middle, browser on my right, and left has team viewer and word or acrobat open with specs on my left. I use Powertoys with custom preset Zones/layouts. VS in fullscreen can comfortably have 6 code windows side by side. Also, with 2 inputs, I can split screen and have my Macbook Pro for Mac OS on the left, and my dev box with Windows on the right.
Dell has an 8K monitor but at over US$4K, not worth our time looking at it - not cost effective for coding. ref: 8K Monitor: Dell Ultrasharp UP3218K | Dell USA[^]
I miss the vertical height of a 4K screen (still have one), and whilst 5120 is not 3840 x 2 (7680), boy, wouldn't that be great, no bezel in the middle like one would with 2 x 4K does make a difference.
Hope that helps!
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
modified 20-Aug-23 18:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this writeup, it really helped a lot. For me, gonna stick with IPS. Mainly because I won't be watching movies or playing video games on my computer... got the living room TV for that.
Looked at the 32" IPS options too and was close to getting one, but turns out the few I checked out weighed 10 pounds more than 28" ones. Since I don't have the most sturdy desk, my display is tucked in a corner (corner desk), and I'm already using a (older) 28" I know I can get by with one. Been using the laptop's display as a secondary screen as well, so I can continue that route.
At the end of the day, settling on this bad boy. I'll be coming from a TN display, so hopefully should see some nice color differences. I'll save the OLED for the living room.
Thanks again man.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Looked at the 32" IPS options too and was close to getting one, but turns out the few I checked out weighed 10 pounds more than 28" ones
If you own your place, then look at an arm mounted to the wall. You will get desk space back, no weight on your desk, and can position it more freely.
If you get a dual monitor arm, you can reuse the old monitor. 
PS: Watch the NITS (ref: What Is a Nit of Screen Brightness and How Many Do You Need? - Make Tech Easier[^]) of the screen. I would not go below 350. Below 350, the sun will flatten the colours.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in a rental, but I don't think the landlord would care if I did do that. The only catch is... I'm literally facing a corner of the room, so if it were mounted on a wall I'd have to turn my head at an angle.
Note to self, Ikea desks suck.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Check for Studs, that's all that you need. It may not be right in the corner, but a foot or two from the corner... See if a mate has a stud finder, otherwise they're not that expensive.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
You've got me thinking... I haven't clicked buy yet since I'm spending way too much money. Got the new laptop chosen. May look into mounting the monitor. Thanks man.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, come to think of it... I could just stick an extra 2x4 under the desk for support. Sometimes you gotta redneck it. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
The good thing about an arm mount is that where it mounts does not need to be centre, you position the monitor where you want it to be. So if you have a bookcase next to the desk, you could bolt it to that!
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know... thanks.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Except when you noms on some mints like this, they show up in a package like this. Now, even sans aspartame free.
Because... why not.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...computers getting too expensive?
So, here I am, trying to stop myself from buying a new laptop since my current one is about 5 years old. Ain't gonna lie, I'm this close to it. But for a new higher end laptop and monitor (to last another 5 years) it's about $5.6K USD once you add in the extended warranties so the company you buy from doesn't tell you to p1ss off if something goes wrong.
That's like 6K... homes used to cost that much. Probably 1K of that is just the GPU. How on Earth do companies honestly expect non-techy folks to drop that kinda money?
Jeremy Falcon
modified 20-Aug-23 11:34am.
|
|
|
|
|
What the heck are you getting for USD$6K?
|
|
|
|
|
It's just a high end laptop with 2TB drive and 64GB memory and a 28" 144Hz monitor to go with it. $600 of that is just extended warranties / replacement (which is crazy). And I'm sure a third of the remainder is the GPU. Wouldn't surprise me.
I don't need the graphics card, but I do want the 64GB RAM. Seems like it's all or none though. Not too many years ago, this would've been a 3K purchase for the same thing.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
