|
You will need to know all of the turning radii in addition to the length/width.
Just because cardboard cut-outs might fit, doesn’t prove that you could actually maneuver the cars into those positions.
Consider back-in versus pull-in as the turns and entry/exit for the driver will be different. (In other words, consider passengers’ doors almost touching)
When moving the various cut outs around, be sure to make the appropriate motor noise out loud.😛
|
|
|
|
|
|
First one in, last one out?
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
"What would you do if saw a space man?"
"I'd park in it, man!"
|
|
|
|
|
Biggest issue you will have is the ability of said drivers to actually execute the parking layout plan you come up with.
For Example, I have a 3 car garage. I can get all my tools and 2 cars plus, I can get my truck into my garage and get out of my truck. But no one else in the family could do it. There is less that 2 inches of clearance front to back and on one side.
Good luck.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
I'd wager that it took more time to compose your post than it would have just parking the cars. Why does everything have to be software-ized?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
David Crow wrote: Why does everything have to be software-ized?
This. A million times this. I honestly can't tell whether OP is being serious or not.
And just because some software says X number of cars should fit in Y amount of space (based on some calculations performed using N number of variables as input, where any of which could be based on inaccurate measurements), doesn't mean all drivers involved are good enough to get their own car in and out without tearing into another car.
Frankly, if parking is that tight, it's time to look elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
That might be confusing optimal with best.
From the intellectual (ok really emotional) point of view you probably want the new car 'behind' the older ones. That way when a car is sticking out, which I suspect is going to happen, and it gets clipped then it won't be the new one.
The other solution of course is just to sell one of the older cars.
|
|
|
|
|
You can fit a lot more cars if you just abandon the requirement that the driver should be able to get out of the car.
(In my childhood car vacation, one of the reasons why drivers/passengers were not allowed to remain in the car on the ferry deck was that the cars were packed so densely that no car door could be opened. The ferry was filled right-to-left, and emptied left-to-right. Passengers had to leave the car before bordering, and walk ashore at the destination.
If you introduce a policy of when who is allowed to park, you might get to something resembling the ferries of my childhood,
|
|
|
|
|
Dog end stop it (7)
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Nice! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Curtail. Nice one.
Cur = Dog
Tail = the Dog End.
|
|
|
|
|
Dead simple but I like it 
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
today I get a task to record attendees for our team meetings. almost 40 people potentially across different dept.
WE use Microsoft team meetings to host our meetings.
Do we have a quick way to count how many people attend this meeting?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Can you count how many didn't attend and subtract them?
modified 21-Jun-23 20:12pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the thumbnails: count the columns, multiply by the rows.
Or pretend you are a teacher, and take a roll call. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
my real challenge is to write these names down. I am afraid not taking note of these attendees on time in case they drop in the middle...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
this link is great! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
it should say something like "xx people in the call" somewhere, where xx is a number of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Teams has the "people" list, that gives you the number of currently attending, when it comes to 100 or more it shows "99+" but if you hove the mouse it gives you the real number. And IIRC there is some stats available for the organisator to see max, average and a couple of things more...
Sorry I can't give more details because I don't organise meetings for more than 10 people (but have attended a couple sessions where we were over 500, and another session even reached the 1k limit)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
after meeting is over. Double click on the calendar meeting then click attendance.
This is the people who actually opened the link. but it won't include the "extras" that are in a meeting room sharing a screen for the meeting.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Southmountain wrote: almost 40...Do we have a quick way to count how many people attend this meeting?
I question the process need for that.
What is the point of knowing if 38 people versus 40 were there?
If you are going to layoff those 40 people then you should be doing it individually.
If you just want a sales ra-ra meeting then those who are not in sales could be more effective by doing their job (which also makes the company successful) versus going to a meeting. But if they want to go then let them.
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #514 3/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜⬅️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨↖️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
convergence no map needed
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 732 1/6
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Felt like being loyal paid off... 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
