|
That's why I always have my charger with me in hand luggage. If I need to, then I plug my own hardware in the outlet, and no my phone in the public USB cable.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, that is the most safe way. And I do it also like that.
[Edit]
In rare cases I plug my device for charging using an adapter mentioned before.
And I trust my mobile when it shows 'charging only available' 
modified 15-May-23 15:55pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. A prophylactic adapter for power only.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
You'll be OK with any USB sockets you can find - USB is an international standard. But be aware that, depending on where you're going and the sort of places you're staying, you may find that many hotels / pubs don't have USB outlets on the wall sockets. Also be aware that if you're going to the more remote parts of Scotland, hotel WiFi may be very slow or non-existent, and that even mobile phone (cellphone) coverage may be poor. I had a great tour round the highlands last month but some days it just wasn't worth bothering trying to connect. (e.g. one place had a 1Mb/s connection shared between 10 chalets). Of course other places it was absolutely fine, fast and modern.
You should be able to pick up a mains/USB charger very easily once you're here though.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't speak for Ireland other than 1/2 my family is from there, but Scotland? The men don't wear pants and they have large swords  "Freeddom!!!!"
You are taking a dream vacation or trip or whatever. Thought? When you land in Scotland, buy a prepaid phone with the hardware. Less debris to drag around less to plan for.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
And then I have a souvenir too!
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
In general always use your adapter and cord, malicious payloads from public USB chargers are a thing.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
... ok.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Considering the size of the adapters and cables, we don't travel anywhere without them. There is too much variation even traveling in the U.S. Many places don't have 'A' plugs in rooms. I'd definitely bring a Euro adapter and a standard brick to have available.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for late reply...
Solution as under:
Support information - say, without me (confused?) (8)
Support: definition
Information: DATA
Say, without me: VO(I)CE
Confused - scrambled indicator
Support: ADVOCATE
I really thought this was a better clue! 
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
modified 15-May-23 11:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, we surrender - what was it?
(You are up again tomorrow, BTW)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted the solution...
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like a decent clue to me. I just didn't think of the solution. I'd give this to you as a legitimate win. So, I'll say "nicely done" and look forward to tomorrow's clue.
|
|
|
|
|
It was a much better clue
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
@ChandraRam
Where's the CCC? 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So, I do a lot of Angular development. I help out with a number of projects, all of which have their own npm dependencies. My typical workflow with a new project is to git clone the repo, run npm i to install the dependencies and go off and have a cup of tea while npm downloads all the dependencies. Now, there are ways that you can download a single npm dependency to a centrally managed folder, which will create a symlink for you locally, but as far as I can see, there's no way to tell something like Angular to do this with every package so my diskspace gets eaten up by 100s of Mb of duplicated packages on every install.
|
|
|
|
|
There's probably an NPM package for that... 
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: So, I do a lot of Angular development.
My condolences. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: there's no way to tell something like Angular to do this with every package
As much as I dislike Angular, can't blame it for this issue. This would be an npm thing. IMO localized packages are better and less error prone. That being said, the first real issue here is Angular is bloatware.  Also, make sure the devs working on it don't add a new package for every last thing in the world that could easily be done with vanilla JS.
Buuutttt, since you passed the point of no return it seems, npm supports the ability to always use a global folder no matter what.
https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v9/using-npm/config#global
Just stick that bad boy in a npmrc file in your home directory (~/.npmrc) and nuke the old node_modules folders for your projects and try again. Keep in mind, you'll still probably have a local node_modules folder because packages use it for other things (not sure, never tried) but if you do it should be a lot smaller at least.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: IMO localized packages are better and less error prone.
I agree strongly.
Always seemed like potentially a failure path that would just show up unexpectedly.
Same thing happens when a developer decides to use a new library which requires multiple other libraries to be updated (tens or even more.) And yet when I mention that this now requires a full regression they can't understand why.
|
|
|
|
|
So, I couldn't find any mention of this when I was crashing around the npm docs. Your google-fu is strong Master Falcon.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I dunno why, but it is hard to find. I just got frustrated with stuff myself not too long ago and went through the docs. So I, err we, got lucky. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Also, if these packages are interdependent, it may be worthwhile looking into peer dependencies too. My first post is the quick fix, but peer dependencies are technically another option. They shouldn't be abused however, but it's an option.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Pete, Python. Python, meet Pete.
You two will hate each other...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... and Chris lights the match...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif)
ery at events like DefCon; there are no documented cases of it in the wild.
