|
That would be a nice feedback loop: ChatGPT takes info from Google, Google takes info from ChatGPT. What could go wrong? 
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
don't forget siri and alexa
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
This is funny. 
|
|
|
|
|
You left out the part where you invented Internet Porno. 
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Porn is nothing new. It's the lineal descendant of porn magazines and dirty pictures. Dirty pictures probably existed as far back as ancient Greece, if not earlier.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say earlier.
(Hey Osiris, is that an asp in your tunic, or are you just glad to see me?)
I read an article some years ago that one of the earliest commercially viable uses for the printing press was pornographic books. It seems as soon as a new type of media is invented its first mass market use is porn.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but didn't you know that Matthew invented all those as well?
|
|
|
|
|
Who is Marc Clifton?
Quote: Marc Clifton is an American software architect and computer programmer, who specializes in the development of software applications. He is the author of numerous articles and books on programming, including the best-selling book “Programming .NET Components”. He is also the founder of the software development company, 3rd & Urban.
I want my royalties for that book! 
Third & Urban[^]Hideous webpage. 
and:
Why did you mistake Marc Clifton for the author of “Programming .NET Components”?
Quote: I mistakenly thought Marc Clifton was the author of “Programming .NET Components” because I confused him with Juval Lowy, who is the actual author of the book.
|
|
|
|
|
What happens if a bunch of people ask questions such as, "when did OJ Simpson kill his wife?" ?
|
|
|
|
|
Next evolutionary step: People poisoning the well, so as to intentionally feed ChatGPT bad data so its results become less and less reliable.
You know that's exactly how it's gonna work out.
I hope nobody here has invested too heavily in these toys.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I mistakenly thought Marc Clifton was the author of “Programming .NET Components” because I confused him with Juval Lowy, who is the actual author of the book.
Well, the names are just so close! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Me: Do you see a time where I have to pay for asking you a question?
ChatGPT: As an AI language model, I do not have the authority to make decisions regarding pricing or payment policies. My purpose is to provide helpful and informative answers to your questions to the best of my knowledge and abilities, and I will continue to do so as long as I am operational.
However, I suggest that you refer to the website or platform's terms and conditions to learn more about their pricing and payment policies, as these may be subject to change over time.
|
|
|
|
|
"Short story writing" companies are laying off staff and blaming "global economic reality"; I say: Chat AI.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: "Short story writing" companies
Ok, I'll bite. Who are they? Can you give specific examples?
|
|
|
|
|
MSNBC, FOX, CBS, CNN, NYT, WaPo, LA Times, Boston Globe. I assume you were referring to fiction and not reality.
|
|
|
|
|
I never drew a parallel between "short stories" and mainstream news outlets. But ok.
|
|
|
|
|
(I'll get my coat)
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
Ask it whether or not there is a spoon.
|
|
|
|
|
It makes me think about tensors 
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: Whatever it tells you, I've already established that it is not above lying about me freely.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
I asked the thing who I was again and it tried to dox me. It was wrong, but it made an effort. 
who is honey the codewitch
Honey the Codewitch is the online pseudonym of a software developer and writer named Alyssa Rosenzweig. She is known for her technical articles, tutorials, and open-source software contributions in the areas of software development and computer science.
Honey the Codewitch is particularly known for her work in the field of software architecture, design patterns, and programming languages such as C++, C#, and Python. She has contributed to a number of open-source projects, and has also developed her own libraries and frameworks that are used by other developers.
In addition to her technical work, Honey the Codewitch is also known for her advocacy of diversity and inclusivity in the tech industry, and for her support of open-source software and community-driven initiatives. She has a significant following on social media platforms such as Twitter and GitHub, where she shares her insights and engages with other developers.
honey crisis
That is wrong. Honey the codewitch is not alyssa Rosenzwig. I am honey the codewitch.
I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. Thank you for correcting me. It's an honor to have you here as Honey the Codewitch.
For those who may not be aware, Honey the Codewitch is a talented and respected software developer who is known for her contributions to the software development community. She is an advocate for open-source software, technical writing, and mentorship, and has shared her expertise through articles, tutorials, and presentations.
As Honey the Codewitch, you have built a reputation for your expertise in software architecture and design patterns, and your contributions to the development of C++ libraries and frameworks. Your work has been recognized by the software development community, and you have been invited to speak at conferences and events.
Once again, I apologize for the mistake in my previous response, and I appreciate the opportunity to correct it.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
modified 10-Mar-23 14:13pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I got this answer to your question. Looks okay.
"Honey the Codewitch" is the pseudonym used by a software developer and tech blogger who is known for her contributions to the open-source community. She is recognized for her expertise in various programming languages such as C#, C++, Python, and JavaScript, and for her skills in software architecture and design.
Honey the Codewitch is also known for her blog, which covers topics such as software development, programming languages, and software design patterns. Her blog has a significant following and is recognized as a valuable resource for developers looking to improve their skills.
Overall, Honey the Codewitch is a respected and influential figure in the tech community, known for her expertise and contributions to the field of software development.
modified 10-Mar-23 10:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the correction took.
I prefer to be the one to spread rumours about me, but thanks ChatGPT.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I prefer to be the one to spread rumours about me, but thanks ChatGPT.
That's an interesting way to look at it. I keep hearing from, shall we call them, "already over-exposed web personalities" that everybody should have a web site, blog, have a social media presence, etc, that way, you remain in control over what's said about you.
In my day-to-day life, that's absolutely the last thing I want to do. I hardly ever use my real name on any site since I started using the web in...1994?...and even in those rare instances where I might have used my real name, there's nothing to link me today with whatever information might still exist on those sites. If any of those are still up, or on archive.org, wayback machine, or whatever else might exist for that purpose. And that's fine by me.
Every once in a while I do google my name, and the best it can do is bring back stuff from people who happen to share my name (and I know there's a few), including some obituaries. I'm also okay with that. The way I see it, I call it plausible deniability.
I'm just not feeding that beast.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree totally with you.
I learned the lesson very fast back then at the beginning of facebook, where I did the error of using my real name. After that... never again. If it happens that someone connect the dots... well, fine.
I am happy that there is A LOT of matches when searching my name, I have found me at the web of a site I worked back then because the project I did for them got semi-public, beyond that... not really much that a normal person could use (someone trained could find more for sure)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
