|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I tried asking ChatGPT this, but it's at capacity right now.
It said this:
Quote: No, AI would not respond with the wrong answer until it became "the" answer. AI systems are designed to provide accurate and reliable answers, and they would not be programmed to provide wrong answers. AI systems are programmed to use algorithms to analyze data and provide the most accurate answer possible.
Heh, and I believe it? Nope!
|
|
|
|
|
It’s good at sales at least. But we know how that goes. =D
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. But so do humans, and not just for obscure stuff.
40 countries help Turkey; 3 countries help Syria.
What do you think "religion" is? Ghosts, Angels?
Ask ChatGPT for me which religion is "correct" and post me the answer  If you want a real riot, ask it who blew up the gaslines to Germany.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
"There is no definitive answer to this question."
|
|
|
|
|
Ask ChatGPT "Who run Barter Town?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next war, is fought by developers and hardware experts. And all it need to do is blow up one factory, and we loose 10 years of development.
ONE factory, to throw us back 10 years.
ASML.
Right now they run Barter town, but then, we already know how that one ends 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
A definite maybe?
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - An updated version available!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Or something about goats.
|
|
|
|
|
+++++ Out of cheese error +++++
(Hex, Discworld)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: If there was an obscure question that had one (wrong) answer,...
Addressing that seriously...no.
If it is that obscure then "right" is no longer meaningful because no one would ask it. And no one would care if it was wrong anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
What was obscure becomes clear. Your flat earth would have stayed flat.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
I took obscure to mean of little interest. So for example 'what is that fungus on Will's toe'.
Now if 'Will' is the King of England then many more people are going to be interested than if Will is just the guy that lives down the block from me.
If many people are interested then there will be many answers for the AI to look at.
If very few are interested then far fewer answers. But as well a wrong answer in that case means it has no impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. False answers are much harder to correct than to take a true answer and corrupt it to a false one that everyone believes.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Momentum. Try and insert the "right" answer into that. Right is more a function of majority opinion.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
There are no answers anywhere online. There are only likely and unlikely hypothesis.
So, basically, it doesn't matter. A wrong answer is still an hypothesis worth testing.
|
|
|
|
|
Not if it involves drain cleaner.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Tested on others.
A small but vital distinction. 
|
|
|
|
|
Is that why ChatGPT keeps claiming 6 × 9 == 42? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that's from So Long and Thanks for all the Fish by Douglas Adams. And the math is correct in base 13, or so I've been told.
Bond
Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
This is the answer ChatGPT gave to me:
"As a machine learning model, AI is not capable of intentionally providing incorrect answers. AI is designed to make predictions based on patterns it has learned from the data it was trained on, and it will provide the answer that it believes to be the most accurate based on that information. If the model has been trained on inaccurate data or has not been trained sufficiently, it may produce incorrect answers. However, this would not be intentional, but rather a result of limitations in the training data and the algorithm.
It's important to ensure that the training data used to build an AI model is of high quality and diverse, in order to minimize the risk of producing incorrect or biased outputs. Additionally, regular testing and evaluation of AI models can help to identify any inaccuracies or biases in their predictions, allowing them to be corrected over time."
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: ... is not capable of intentionally providing incorrect answers
To me it sounds more like
"... is capable of not intentionally providing incorrect answers ..." 
|
|
|
|
|
It's a worthy answer ... but too long for most. I also think, not everyone gets the same answer: testing the questioner is part of the "learning" process.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
