Click here to Skip to main content
15,887,135 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: Application Starvation Pin
RickZeeland16-Dec-22 7:00
mveRickZeeland16-Dec-22 7:00 
GeneralTeams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
Marc Clifton16-Dec-22 2:38
mvaMarc Clifton16-Dec-22 2:38 
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
dandy7216-Dec-22 3:16
dandy7216-Dec-22 3:16 
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
  Forogar  16-Dec-22 3:19
professional  Forogar  16-Dec-22 3:19 
JokeRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
Daniel Pfeffer16-Dec-22 3:29
professionalDaniel Pfeffer16-Dec-22 3:29 
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
yacCarsten16-Dec-22 15:42
yacCarsten16-Dec-22 15:42 
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
trønderen16-Dec-22 16:12
trønderen16-Dec-22 16:12 
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:11
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:11 
Actually, that is a standard function in X.400 email, and one of the reasons why the X.400 standard prevailed in some commercial contexts quite for quite long.

Note that in X.400, there is a well defined separation between the end user (either as sender or as recipient) and the mail transfer network. If you specified a delivery time for a message, it was sent to the recipient's 'local post office' immediately, or as soon as possible, but held back there until the specified time, at which it was put into the mailbox.

If the mail transfer was slow or unreliable (as it often was, 35-40 years ago), this would ascertain that the message was delivered on time, which could be of great legal importance in e.g. bidding processes or anything with a deadline (there was also a function for cancelling a message before the specified delivery time; this was also considered an essential function from a legal point of view), information that for legal reasons should be held back until a certain time, etc.

I believe that in the days of telegrams, delivered to your doorstep, you could also specify a delivery time. E.g. your 'Congratulations!' to a marrying couple would be delivered during the wedding dinner, to be read out loud to all the guests.

Another X.400 function of essential legal importance was non-repudiation: When the mail transport service put the message in the recipient's mailbox, it could return to the sender a proof that the message had been delivered, and the delivery time, so that the recipient couldn't deny knowledge of, say, your bid before the deadline. Also, you could request that the recipient's user agent reported when the recipient actually fetched the message from his mailbox (although for most legal purposes, the time when the message was made available to him, in his mailbox, was probably more significant).

This non-repudiation was also an essential reason why telex/teletext lived so long: It served as proof that an offer or bid had been given at the given time. Also common to telex/teletext and X.400: The infrastructure made it very difficult to forge a sender ID.

SMTP did get a receipt confirmation function, but many years later, and as it is handled by the recipient himself, it cannot serve as proof of anything. Sender ID is as easy to forge as ever. Sometimes I am surprised that people dare to send anything of commercial/legal importance through SMTP at all ... Smile | :)
GeneralRe: Teams has this "send message later" feature... Pin
Eddy Vluggen16-Dec-22 10:33
professionalEddy Vluggen16-Dec-22 10:33 
GeneralSound of the Week Pin
Sander Rossel16-Dec-22 0:40
professionalSander Rossel16-Dec-22 0:40 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
Craig Robbins16-Dec-22 1:08
Craig Robbins16-Dec-22 1:08 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
RickZeeland16-Dec-22 3:39
mveRickZeeland16-Dec-22 3:39 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
Sander Rossel22-Dec-22 23:58
professionalSander Rossel22-Dec-22 23:58 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
David O'Neil16-Dec-22 7:39
professionalDavid O'Neil16-Dec-22 7:39 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
peterkmx17-Dec-22 4:28
professionalpeterkmx17-Dec-22 4:28 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
David O'Neil17-Dec-22 6:24
professionalDavid O'Neil17-Dec-22 6:24 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
Sander Rossel23-Dec-22 0:20
professionalSander Rossel23-Dec-22 0:20 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
peterkmx17-Dec-22 4:17
professionalpeterkmx17-Dec-22 4:17 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
Sander Rossel23-Dec-22 0:51
professionalSander Rossel23-Dec-22 0:51 
GeneralRe: Sound of the Week Pin
peterkmx23-Dec-22 3:28
professionalpeterkmx23-Dec-22 3:28 
GeneralSome of my favorite meaningless advertising phrases Pin
Craig Robbins16-Dec-22 0:06
Craig Robbins16-Dec-22 0:06 
GeneralRe: Some of my favorite meaningless advertising phrases Pin
OriginalGriff16-Dec-22 0:28
mveOriginalGriff16-Dec-22 0:28 
GeneralRe: Some of my favorite meaningless advertising phrases Pin
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:42
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:42 
GeneralRe: Some of my favorite meaningless advertising phrases Pin
Amarnath S16-Dec-22 1:23
professionalAmarnath S16-Dec-22 1:23 
GeneralRe: Some of my favorite meaningless advertising phrases Pin
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:47
trønderen16-Dec-22 9:47 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.