|
There is always the browser history option , but even so it’s not guaranteed you’ll track down your page if you forgot critical details and have no patience to check every single entry
|
|
|
|
|
I tried this on your post.
You are right, it's very nice. Thanks for the suggestion. 
|
|
|
|
|
Kate-X257 wrote: You are right, it's very nice. Thanks for the suggestion
Awesome. That's exactly why I felt compelled to share this. It's rare nowadays that you discover a feature that can truly save you time.
|
|
|
|
|
The voice options are pretty cool as well. My first language is Afrikaans and you can usually hear when an Afrikaans person speaks English by the accent and they did a good job of capturing that. The same goes for the other accents too.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I played around with those options. I thought the Japanese reader reading english came through pretty much like the real thing.
And the articles from the feed I have it read are from the BBC, so I set it to use a UK accent. Brings it a bit of authenticity. 
|
|
|
|
|
This thread was a good education. I'm glad you brought it up as the idea and possible uses would have escaped me. To be honest though, I was also checking to see if anyone would have mentioned the obvious. Putting text to speech to task reading this post.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your ❤️❤️ for Read Aloud in Microsoft Edge. Will this on to my team that works on learning tools in Edge.
|
|
|
|
|
Right on.
I was just about to make a suggestion - a thought that just occurred to me, but I just found out it's already there.
I was going to suggest allowing the user to highlight a bunch of text, then on right-click, present an option to read only the selection...but I just saw that's actually there!
That'll work great for poorly authored web pages where the browser can't make the distinction between navigation items and the real content that the user probably is interested in. Nice to see you're on the ball.
You have a real opportunity to promote Edge here. This is a great feature, written I'm sure for accessibility reasons, but everyone can benefit from it. A real, tangible, time-saver.
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct GUIDE
rope LINE
pointer
GUIDELINE
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And why not 'I won' ? 
English helps me to go sooner into the grave  
|
|
|
|
|
You seem… tense!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Use of present tense rather past tense: "I win" means "The game has ended, I am the winner"
"I won" means that the game ended some time ago and that I was the winner.
Technically in this case I could have used either since I didn't post the solution until nearly an hour after the game should have ended (four hours is the norm) but since I'd have taken your solution right up to the point where I pressed ENTER the game doesn't officially end until someone announces the solution and the present tense was correct.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you  
|
|
|
|
|
Any time!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So I broke a tooth, went to the dentist, they referred me to an endodontist - fun, fun.
A few months ago, I came across an article where a very popular s/w package that is sold to doctor practices is collecting and selling your data. Since they get the info before it hits the practice IT system, it does not fall under HIPPA. For those of you not the US, HIPPA is short for "thou shalt not share medical information without the patient's consent." Theoretically, big trouble if you do share it. It applies to any medical profession.
Back to the endodontist site, so to fill out the form, I have to agree to 3 pages of such legalize that its absurd. If my data is misused, I have to agree to arbitration no law suit, and I have to do it in the courts of California, yada, yada, yada. Oh, and if the terms change, it's MY responsibility to periodically check back to see if any of the changes bother me. How can that be a valid contract/agreement?
It makes me wonder how many times we just "agree" to this crap and have no concept of what we are agreeing too.
OOO, just got off the phone with the endodontist office - lol. Pissed off. I'd be happy to fill out a piece of paper - oh we don't do that. Okay then, please cancel my appointment. Well, there is a charge for a missed appointment - sure, give it a shot. lol.
Reminds me - does it bother anyone else that medical/dental practices have all gotten happy with the missed appointment fees, but they are not responsible for their own tardiness?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: Do you actually read the "use agreements" of websites?
I probably should, but I don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes and no...
Yes for sites that matter - like when I buy a product or service
No for anything insignificant...
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid." ― Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
This is the problem. If you don't sign/agree, you don't get service. I asked the lady at the front desk on my last visit what I was signing when she asked me to sign 3 times without showing me what I was signing. I said, how do I know what I'm signing. She did offer to print it off for me. Of course I just signed cause I wanted care 
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
Truth, and here in lies the rub.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on the context. Sure, go out to reddit (what a cesspool) and create an account - I'm okay with that.
Medical records? That's a different story. And these doctors, dentists, business office managers have no clue what they are buying. They are in fact writing the check and clicking "Accept".
A few years ago my dearest became very interested in family genealogy. She was tracing roots back as far as we could go. I'm in the US, so one side of my family came from Ireland, the other side from England. Her side was English/German. We used a DNA site to learn more - then the DNA site - those elephanting SOBs sold the data to the FBI. I'm sure it was completely legit in the terms of agreement - or not - they probably changed the terms, and users never logged in to check the changes.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: those elephanting SOBs sold the data to the FBI
Is that how they found you...?
|
|
|
|
|
who is they, and what is your point? 
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: those elephanting SOBs sold the data to the FBI
I remember Neil deGrasse Tyson was pushing 23andme pretty hard as an advertiser for his Star Talk podcast. Then it became public knowledge that yes, they were indeed selling the data to the FBI. Seems to me that this sort of thing ought to be front and center, not hidden in some tiny print near the end of some EULA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: that is sold to doctor practices is collecting and selling your data. Since they get the info before it hits the practice IT system, it does not fall under HIPPA.
FBI conducted 3.4 million warrantless queries last year to a database originally intended only to be used for foreign nationals but which now contains data on US citizens. And there is no way for you to find out if one of those included you. (Far as I have been able to determine the FBI has never identified a single foreign national threat in the US using that database as the original source.)
So myself I don't get too concerned if someone wants data to target an ad to me about toothpaste.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
