|
 That must be it, thank you!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Don't trust the NIST. They wouldn't be touting any encryption algorithms that they can't already break.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
You can install the server wherever you like (a local development machine, a VM in the cloud, etc.) and access it securely through the browser using VS Code for the Web (also known as vscode.dev), without the hassle of setting up SSH or https Now your IDE can have a split personality
And I'm sure someone will be checking for that ability to launch remote cyberattacks, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And I'm sure someone will be checking for that ability to launch remote cyberattacks, right?
Rats, you beat me to it.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Security researchers are warning that hackers can abuse online programming learning platforms to remotely launch cyberattacks, steal data, and scan for vulnerable devices, simply by using a web browser. They are intended to make things easier
|
|
|
|
|
DRY was the first programming principle I encountered and probably the only one I was aware of for the first year that I was a developer. It's all wet?
|
|
|
|
|
He's wrong. Simple =/= quick. It also doesn't mean less complicated. I spent years cleaning up the mess that he would have encouraged and it was not fun. Maintainability is as important as anything else and he is completely ignoring this.
The art is learning when to apply things and not to apply them; not spaz out and write an article decrying DRY only to admit at the end to not toss it completely.
I also smell a common issue... No RDBMS skills to allow application logic to be enforced or guided by data structures.
|
|
|
|
|
frontlinegeek wrote: The art is learning when to apply things and not to apply them; not spaz out and write an article decrying DRY only to admit at the end to not toss it completely.
"There is always a well-known solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong."
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
The data was taken to test how well the telescope could stay locked onto a target. "Shine on, you crazy diamond"
|
|
|
|
|
Who designed the thing? J. J. Abrams?
All that lens flare.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: All that lens flare.
Somewhere I read that it is a result of the hexagon panel shape.
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct!
From the article: Bright stars stand out with their six, long, sharply defined diffraction spikes—an effect due to Webb’s six-sided mirror segments.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
The latest test data by system builder Puget Systems finds that Windows 11 is indeed faster now than it was previously, though it does not have a clear advantage over Windows 10 either as the two seem to be trading blows in terms of hardware performance. "But this one goes to 11!"
|
|
|
|
|
I like the quote, but I found the movie so boring that I actually fell asleep watching it (just like The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy). Everyone seemed so dumb to me that it wasn't interesting. Maybe I was just tired those nights, but I doubt it...
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I could agree. All of the Christopher Guest movies are like that - slow, but intended to let a bunch of his friends adlib their way through scenes in silly situations. I need to be in the mood for them, they're definitely not a 'watch anytime' kind of movie.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
A team of physicists at the University of Edinburgh's School of Physics and Astronomy has used mathematical calculations to show that quantum communications across interstellar space should be possible. "Hailing frequencies open"
Now we just need to invent quantum communications, and we're ready to go!
|
|
|
|
|
Does not compute. Quantum questions must be asked on quantum computers.
|
|
|
|
|
So is that sub-space communication or hyper-space communication?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Will they go volunteers to the other side of the communication path to see if it really works?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Send Bezos and the other billionaire bullies - they are the only ones special enough for the job!
|
|
|
|
|
Bezos would never leave the Earth.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder how much money was spent on figuring out that quantum entanglement provides this capability.
|
|
|
|
|
For all the talk over the past two decades about aligning business and technology efforts, IT professionals report they still have difficulties crossing this chasm. Or perhaps nirvana is leaving it at a distance?
Let the wheel continue to rotate
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: DevOps nirvana
Smells like corporate bull****
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
