|
Sorry holy sh*t what?
Quote: That has nothing to do with the question. Rockets travel in a vertical direction relative to the ground.
What? Rockets work only vertical?  
Only nonsense. Stop doing this...
|
|
|
|
|
What on earth are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
Read the nonsense you wrote
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm tired of reading the nonsense you wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
Did'nt you write this?
Quote: That has nothing to do with the question. Rockets travel in a vertical direction relative to the ground.
?? So rockets are only able to fly vertical??
Read this: Reaction engine - Wikipedia[^]
modified 10-Apr-22 15:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Sorry, I'm tired of reading the nonsense you wrote.
Stiff upper lips: I'm never wrong...
I'm tired to reading your nonsense and I'm wondering why CP let your nonsense trough
|
|
|
|
|
Enough, guys.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: It has nothing to do with either wheels or floats. It can only take off if it is moving forwards at take off speed, relative to the ground. If it is stationary relative to the ground then there will be no lift applied to it.
Sorry again. If you don't see from what an airplane is driven (and not glued by wheels to the ground especally not to the jets) then I can't help.
It is simply physics and there is no need to construct unreal cases.
|
|
|
|
|
I have not constructed an unreal case, merely stated the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action - reaction. The wheels won't turn - the conveyor will move with the plane; the forward movement of the wheels moves the conveyor.
Nothing is being applied to the wheels; it's only holding the plane up. Along the lines of spaceship thrusters: no friction needed.
I think you can assume the conveyor acts as a friction-less surface.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Many years ago at a tiny company where we consumed our lunches together at the conference table we had a similar heated discussion this time re/ if you walked up a down escalator w/o changing your elevation did you do any work? I now can not imagine why this was so perplexing at the time. Then there is Richard Feynman wondering if one can piss whilst upside down.
Below is my "Signature" apologies if offends
My sympathies to the SPAM moderator
"I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright
"Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman
“I want to sing, I want to cry, I want to laugh. Everything together. And jump and dance. The day has arrived — yippee!” - Desmond Tutu
“When the green flag drops the bullshit stops!”
"It is cheaper to save the world than it is to ruin it."
"I must have had lessons" - Reverend Jim Ignatowski / Christopher Lloyd
"Dripping water hollows out stone, not through force, but through persistence." - Ovid, Roman poet
Personal Web Page https://mypaltrythoughts.blogspot.com/[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for your replies, the links and the videos.
When I posted this question, little did I imagine that it would raise such an intense discussion. Thanks once again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The speed of the wheels is irrelevant - they aren't powered or driven in any way.
The speed of the airflow over the wings is the source of lift, along with the wings angle of incidence.
Assuming the conveyor is moving at the same speed (but in the opposite direction) as the aircraft would be on a normal runway then the aircraft would actually be stationery and the airflow over the wings would effectively be zero and thus not generating any lift?
|
|
|
|
|
Leo56 wrote: Assuming the conveyor is moving at the same speed (but in the opposite direction) as the aircraft would be on a normal runway then the aircraft would actually be stationery and the airflow over the wings would effectively be zero and thus not generating any lift?
I sure would like to see that airplane sitting there on the runway with the engines running at full power, but the plane is standing completely still because its wheels are spinning around. Nothing else is holding the plane back, and the wheels are free running, but in some magical way they still manage to cancel out the full power of the engines.
I'd sure like to see that happen. And also to have a reasonable explanation how it can be possible.
|
|
|
|
|
The airplane does or does not lift off owing to the upward airflow forces on the wings.
If the air does not move relative to the airplane (or vice versa) the plane will stay on the ground.
And the speed of the conveyorbelt relative to the air close by will cause some drag, therefore some
lift, but it is likely to be way too little, unless you add a quite signifant ventilator to help.
That should be pretty obvious, but I miss the joke - if there is one?
|
|
|
|
|
Why wouldn't the engines provide exactly the same thrust on the plane body, giving it the same forward acceleration as on a non-belted runway?
|
|
|
|
|
My understanding was that the engines were not used. If I took that one wrong, sorry.
But engines give forward thrust irrespective of the behavior of the wheels (assuming they can turn), so in that case the plane would go forward anyway, the wheels just having to turn faster in response to the belt.
|
|
|
|
|
If the engines are not running, I would definitely not want the plane to take off!
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you have a really big fan blowing at a speed at least that of the aircrafts V2 (take off) speed. 
|
|
|
|
|
Then the aircraft will go and hit that fan 
|
|
|
|
|
It obviously can since propulsion for airplanes is provided by i/e a jet engine. Airplane doesn't accelerate using wheels, like i/e a car. Conveyor belt would only make the wheels spin faster, and that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually ... no. The conveyor will have an effect and can increase lift - slightly - since it will also drag the air along with it and if that interacts with the wings it effectively act like the plane is going faster. (That's why aircraft carriers always launch steaming full ahead into the wind when launching and recovering aircraft - it adds a few MPH to their airspeed and reduces the chances of a stall.)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Your answer is confusing. First, you say: actually no, then continue with a reasonable explanation on why some extra lift would be achieved. So, airplane WOULD take off, which I assume was the point of the q. Whether it'd have more lift or no due to conveyor belt is a minor detail.
There's also the matter of how long the conveyor belt is. If it's as long as the runway, then yea, but if it's as long as the airplane, airplane could fall off and probably crash in front of it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
