Welcome to the Lounge

Quote:

I'm poring over C code right now - C really isn't that much better, but fortunately you can do less with it. The code is evil. It's absolutely terrible to read, almost as if they were *trying* to hide intent.

charlieg wrote:

but to be honest, that can be done in any language.

char* code = "\xCC\xFF...";
typedef int* myfunct(int i)
int result = (myfunct)(code)(45);

/* Do not change this code or ponies will cry */

honey the codewitch wrote:

but would it kill people to write readable code, or at least comment it with something *helpful*?

if(pin_d1>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d1-32)&31))&1)<<1);
} else if(pin_d1>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d1))&1)<<1);
}
if(pin_d2>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d2-32)&31))&1)<<2);
} else if(pin_d2>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d2))&1)<<2);
}
if(pin_d3>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d3-32)&31))&1)<<3);
} else if(pin_d3>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d3))&1)<<3);
}
if(pin_d4>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d4-32)&31))&1)<<4);
} else if(pin_d4>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>((pin_d4)&31))&1)<<4);
}
if(pin_d5>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d5-32)&31))&1)<<5);
} else if(pin_d5>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d5))&1)<<5);
}
if(pin_d6>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d6-32)&31))&1)<<6);
} else if(pin_d6>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d6))&1)<<6);
}
if(pin_d7>31) {
    b |= (((pins_h>>((pin_d7-32)&31))&1)<<7);
} else if(pin_d7>-1) {
    b |= (((pins_l>>(pin_d7))&1)<<7);
}