|
|
When a multi-billion corporation with the resources of Microsoft even has a development environment that allows the creation of a dialog that has the only button disabled, I think I'm right to be less than impressed. I don't even know if this IS an error. It tells me nothing whatsoever of use and doesn't provide any advice or guidance on where to find further assistance or to help me resolve the problem. The dialog itself is not draggable, does not allow the message to be copied to the clipboard, does not follow acknowledged best practice for message box styling, etc.. etc..
And since we're discussing MS's stupidity at this point, how about the fact that if I search for "install XBox Game Bar" I get to the MS page about XBox Game Bar, with a big button saying "Get" at the right. here[^] If I click on that "Get" button, eventually (i.e. after quite a few seconds) another window opens, with (apart from a slightly different menu) exactly the same logo, heading, text and "Get" button. It's like nothing has happened. WTF is that all about? I have to hit "Get" again which, I assume, downloads the application and then the Get button changes to "Install". When I click on "Install", nothing happens. Absolutely zilch, zero, nada... nothing. The cursor doesn't even change. No new window, no message pop-up, absolutely nothing. There are three dots to the right of "Install", which, if I click, opens a single "submenu" item "Install on my devices". Well, I'm hardly in a position to install on someone else's devices, am I - or is MS security now such that one can install stuff on other people's devices??
Anyway, if I click on that, I get an overlay (NOT a separate dialog box or window, just an overlay with a thin line around it). It's headed "Where do you want to install?". At the bottom are two buttons: "Cancel", and "Install now". Install now is disabled. I would copy and paste the text that explains things (a little) but once again MS have not enabled this functionality, making it so much harder to search for appropriate information. The gist is that I don't have an applicable device linked to my MS account. Seems I need to sign in on a device with my MS account. So, which is it? I don't have a device linked to my account, or I'm not signed in?
This garbage is on the Microsoft Store application. This is supposedly how I'm to install MS products these days. MS are so arrogant / incompetent that this, one of their preferred channels for getting users to install their software, is buggy, unhelpful, inconsistent and seems to despise any would-be user.
Don't get me wrong - I love some MS products. Windows 2000 was great, rock-solid and installed in minutes. Office 2003 gives me everything I need for my productivity applications. And I even quite like VS2015, though it's bloated and unintuitive in many areas. Oh, and I installed the old Calc.exe to replace the abortion that comes with Windows 10.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure it will amuse you even more that when I click on the first "Get" button, it opens the store (?) with a message "The thing you're looking for isn't here - we probably don't have it, but just in case, try searching for it".
I gave up.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel your pain - I've been through similar hoops when trying to download a free program that claims to work on a PC. Trouble is that the Windows Store only downloads to mobile phones, not PCs.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Microsoft does/did have some crappy error messages. One I got when trying to do a Windows 10 update a couple years ago said: "Something happened". That was the total error message, no error codes, no info on what what it might have been working on.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows Settings > Gaming > Enable Xbox Game Bar ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I second that.
I've created videos for Pluralsight using OBS Studio, so it's a perfectly fine bit of software.
The best part about it is you can mix EVERYTHING
If your PC can see it or hear it, it can record it and/or live stream it.
I routinely produce videos for the local history club where I put a green screen behind me, mask out my background, then lay the computer screen on that, while I have my Web Camera image of myself down in the bottom corner.
I've also used it to mix in Skype/Zoom/Teams etc into my live desktop and camera to produce multi person cameras.
If you have several monitors, you can set each monitor up for different parts, then seamlessly switch between them, it's a doddle to do, and stupid powerful for what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't check it out, but a colleague recommended me AnyMP4. It is a paid product, but not so expensive.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've used OBS Studio for 7+ years. Works well and is free.
|
|
|
|
|
My work bought Snagit [^] for me and it's a simple and easy to use program with decent annotating tools. But it's not exactly free. 
|
|
|
|
|
Not free, but not expensive either, Golden Records have something called (IIRC) Debut.
|
|
|
|
|
Nand, I realize you want something free.
Techsmith offers Capture (or did).
Also, I ended buying SnagIt (and I also own camtasia).
As a professional, sometimes I have to absorb the price of tools.
In my case, I use SnagIt DAILY, so it's a no brainer.
It does fixed screen, and movies of screen with various microphone/audio settings.
It will do what you want, and works quite well...
Shame on SnagIt for creating Jing (A wonderfully easy tool), and killing it because of flash,
instead of creating a hackathon around replacing it with an MP4 generator.
Capture sucks by comparison to Jing. But I believe they were losing SnagIt sales to Jing Users,
and the push to replace flash output was just too hard to justify in a free tooL!
|
|
|
|
|
I've used Debut professional by NCH for many years to produce user instruction tutorials for Apps/Systems that I developed. The most important issue that I found was to get a high enough resolution so that users could read the fine print and that the media format used was common across most devices and that the streaming file wasn't gigantic. For example user's need to be able to read the individual items in a DropDown List on a busy screen. Debut professional configured to record in .mp4 provided very good results in a common format.
Whilst there is a cost there is also a trial version that you can test and evaluate.
/*It always looks impossible till it's done */
|
|
|
|
|
That's because they're coughy filters.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
:groan:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto!
|
|
|
|
|
Hold still DR. We're going to have to hurt you now. 
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said before, on a commercial project I'm working on I imported GFX, wrote an RA8875 driver for it, got it running on our ESP32 based product.
Then it has been screens screens screens since then. I really don't like that part.
I am proud of what I've produced though. The thing looks really sharp - anti-aliased fonts - double buffered text draws, snappy, minimalist design. It's like a simple web site with buttons so it's pretty easy to use.
But man am I tired. I worked over 20 hours in the past 48, and that's not typical of me. I wish it was the kind of tired where I could sleep. I'm bored because I want to code but I totally can't right now. I just don't have it in me.
Gosh it was worth it though. It's like the app evolved 25 years in a few days.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
SkyNet wrote: the app evolved 25 years in a few days.
|
|
|
|
|
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
So it's outdated? When can we expect a new version? 
|
|
|
|
|
Legendary! 
But don't let your overboss overwork ya!
|
|
|
|
|
I may coax an article out of this yet - "using GFX to render professional screens" or something like that.
I had to tinker before I got the mix of performance and features I wanted and the machine could handle, but in this case the results were really good, especially compared to the old version. It's like they come from different decades. Apple's OS vs MS DOS. Like that. I'm really happy with it, and thrilled that the ESP32 WROVER can handle it. All of the features work on an ESP32 WROOM too but the extra 4MB+ of PSRAM makes my code operate faster.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
