|
... how some text will be converted automatically from upper case to lower case.
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It’s trying to parse as HTML. Use < and > instead.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I can see that. But no, I don't feel to use &xyz I more feel that the backend should take care what it tries to parse and recognize when it fails 
I mean, everbody here around is writing about AI, yes also some of members here are convinced that the spam filter is AI. Now if CP does use such advance technologies, I think parsing the <cr> in a text would be trivial to distingish ...
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Since many frameworks allow you to create you own tags, it would be impossible to determine if a text in this format is HTML(ish) or not.
You are the better AI, and should escape any HTML if required.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
That's interesting.
Our code sanitiser should actually recognise this as a non HTML tag and simply conver the < to a < and leave the text after the < unchanged.
We convert tags to lowercase (it sorta just pops out by default like that) so it seems it could be doing the lowercase conversion then checking if it's a legit tag and encoding brackets instead of the other way around.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Following David O'Neil's (possibly incorrect) link[^] from this message[^] in Firefox 92 produces the following error:
Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Web sites prove their identity via certificates. Firefox does not trust this site because it uses a certificate that is not valid for cdn.codeproject.com. The certificate is only valid for the following names:
default.ssl.fastly.net, fastly.com, *.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.hosts.fastly.net, *.global.ssl.fastly.net, *.fastly.com, a.ssl.fastly.net, purge.fastly.net, mirrors.fastly.net, control.fastly.net, tools.fastly.net
Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This is an incorrect link.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I though it probably was. I wasn't sure whether the cdn.codeproject.com DNS record is resolving to the wrong address, or whether it shouldn't exist at all? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
In 'View Stat' in Articles/Tips.
When a Download file gets updated, its history just gets killed.
Is it normal behavior ?
Is there a way around ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
This may be by design.
I'll review the design decisions.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Hi I just updated an article/tip which almost doubled (now about 30k), Added the 'Game of Life' part.
RLE: The Human Friendly Compression[^]
Reputation FAQ says that there should be 25 reputation points as Editor, but I see none.
Did I missed something ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
The Editor points are for editing other author's articles. It for our editors and sub-editors. I'll have the wording updated.
Point for articles are awarded on posting, but these are really just a nominal amount. Article points are gained through upvotes, downloads of code, and bookmarking of the article.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The Editor points are for editing other author's articles.
Ok, just fine for me, just the FAQ do not say "other author's articles".
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The Editor points are for editing other author's articles.
I can't find where is the link to click for editing another author's article.
How is it done ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not have sufficient points then it is not available to you. Look at your reputation settings on your home page.
|
|
|
|
|
Reputation is 220k
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
No, I said look at your reputation or privileges settings on your home page. That is where it shows what privileges you have, and what you are allowed to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Just had a look at privileges.
looks like not a minimum reputation needed, but looks like a special status (protector ...) is needed.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Protector's can edit articles (I think) but also authors of articles have the ability to set what level of member can edit their article. Most members leave that on the default setting, which is Editor. But you can probably edit this one:
Beginner's Walk - Web Development[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Isee
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings Kind Regards May I suggest the spam filter utilized on this fine site may be a bit dodgy as its' rate of success in my case is zero percent My posts are frequently identified as potential spam I have no idea why They are ultimately permitted It would be interesting educational and perhaps useful if the filter would provide reasons for its' decisions and those presented to the poster Even though the posts are ultimately permitted I still feel a bit insulted to be identified as such Also I do not wish to trouble the human who has the unfortunate task of performing the review Perhaps the filter can be replaced w/ one of higher quality or adjusted in some manner I would be curious as to the identify of the filter and the technology it utilizes - Cheerio
"I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright
"Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings Kind Regards I am not sure how the message you kindly referred me to has a bearing re/ my concerns questions or requests As for the automated system doing a pretty good job my experience as I have stated is just the opposite Publishing its' performance statistics might be helpful for such like me who have little confidence in it One benefit of the post of OriginalGriff is I obtained from it the vague impression moderators do not mind the task If that is the case I will tolerate the automated systems' almost constant errors in my case which will probably include this one as well Best Wishes - Cheerio
"I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright
"Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
PaltryProgrammer wrote: the automated systems' almost constant errors
If you understand anything about AI systems, then you must know they are far from infallible. As OG says, the automated system does a tolerably good job, but it still sees things that are only marginally spam-like, and errs on the side of caution. Had you been around at the time when the site was being bombarded with hundreds of spam messages in an hour, you would see that the system is vital to the health of the site.
modified 7-Sep-21 4:35am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
