|
But, does it smell like teen spirit ?
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Zuckerberg has laid out his vision to transform Facebook from a social media network into a “metaverse company” in the next five years. He just wants to be an alligator in another timeline
I think I heard it recently - "Save us from Tech CEOs"
|
|
|
|
|
As long as he doesn't start experimenting to achieve metahumans too  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Google’s parent-company Alphabet has a birth to announce: a new company called Intrinsic which will focus on building software for industrial robots. A robot must provide advertising views, unless that conflicts with the First or Second Laws
Never mind, just show the ads, Robbie...
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder what will they define as "utterly necessary" telemetry to keep "improving" the robots and what will they do with it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Scammers are already taking advantage of the hype surrounding Microsoft's next Windows release to push fake Windows 11 installers riddled with malware, adware, and other malicious tools. I think calling Windows 11 "malware" is being a little harsh
|
|
|
|
|
As if there were not enough ways to install / get installed from Microsoft... that they have to look for the installer in other dubious places 
Kent Sharkey wrote: I think calling Windows 11 "malware" is being a little harsh
I agree that malware might be a little harsh... I still have to be decide if "piece of crap" fits or not  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rackspace literally decimates workforce: One in ten staffers let go this week • The Register[^]
I think there should be a law that requires US companies to either have at least 90% of it's workforce located in the US, or pay outsourced employees the same salaries that their US counterparts get.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I think there should be a law that consumers must buy at least 90% of their goods domestically, or pay the same price for cheaper foreign goods as for more expensive domestic goods.
EDIT: /sarc
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like it might be in a death spiral to me...
As part of an internal realignment from supporting dedicated servers and on-premises and in-datacenter customers to cloud consulting
[...]
Last year Apollo took Rackspace public again, in part to pay off the debt it accumulated buying the cloud management company in the first place.
Together these are ominous signs to my mind. It would seem that the cloud is cutting out traditional hosting providers like Rackspace and they are not able to pivot and compete with the likes of Amazon and Microsoft.
Buying into consultancy in a field that is not usually heavy with consultancy and being saddled with the debt for buying your own company are both bad signs for the future.
I'd have thought tha Apollo are looking for someone stupid enough to take the carcass off of their hands. Oh, hang on, that was the IPO wasn't it.
modified 25-Jul-21 1:16am.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that my view here is in agreement with most of the comments over at ElReg.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought death spiral as well. What customers are going to want to stick around?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In its latest full-year financial results, released in February, Rackspace banked a net loss of $245.8m in 2020, versus a $102.3m loss in 2019, from sales of $2.7bn, up 11 per cent year-on-year.
They've been around for a while. If they can't turn a profit at this point, they should just quit the business. How anyone can lose money with sales of almost $3 billion is beyond me. IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
This nonsense has been going on for a long time, courtesy of easy money policies. "We lose money on every sale but plan to make it up on volume." That was over 20 years ago now. 
One can only laugh because there's no point in crying. The number of zombie companies--those that can only service their debt by constantly rolling it over and issuing more of it--is a shocking percentage. It will all end in tears, but no one knows when.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a friend who got acquihired there was lucky to get out when he did. He's a mysql guru; and at his prior company mostly helped customers who were murdering their DB performance with badly designed queries/lack of indexing. Rackspace decided he was too expensive to be client facing and then derped around trying to use him internally on projects that never actually went anywhere. He said it felt like they had no real idea what to do with someone with his skillset/abilities. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
UK celebrates 25 years of wasteful, 'underperforming' government IT projects • The Register[^]
Seriously? The ROOT cause of under-performing government IT projects is the "lowest bid" contracting system.Here's how it usually goes:
0) Government asks for bids on a new project.
1) Since the project is new, there is no current incumbent entity from which to gauge salaries, so bids come in at a reasonable (?) pay scale for the devs.
2) Two years later (or whatever the re-compete time frame might be), the incumbent re-bids, and competitors undercut the incumbent with their bids, thus winning the contract.
3) The new contractor company now has to find a way to keep the existing devs, usually be negotiating lower salaries, reduced benefits, or both. Of course, this causes a number of the experienced devs to leave (pissed off no doubt), and the new contractor company will fill those empty seats with devs that will take less money (and that means devs with less experience).
4) Every re-compete cycle, repeat steps 2 and 3, until the result is such a severe reduction of expertise on the dev team that there is nobody left that can actually do the work.
5) Fingers are pointed, the project is abandoned, and chalked up to a "lack of experience" on the part of the devs. Because management couldn't possible be the f*ckin problem.
I'm not a bitter old man, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 24-Jul-21 7:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
Only 25 years? Government projects have been underperforming since IT was a thing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
"No, darling, it's the Washington Post - Honest!"
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Seems more like Washington's Post.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I saw a video of a KFC somewhere. Some bugger had hacked their self-serve ordering computers.
Same deal - porn..
|
|
|
|
|
I believe there may be a straightforward yes/no answer to this. I just want to find out if my way of thinking (being "hell no") is outdated.
There is a surprisingly low amount of information on this topic, the most relevant thing I could find is 11 years old, and back then the person who asked for a screen recording solution in order to keep track of a hired coder has received a lot of negative response and was advised to give it up, but that was 11 years ago. remote desktop - I have a programming contractor - how do I record their screen remotely? - Server Fault[^]
I've been a remote developer under various arrangements (employee, freelance..) for about 15 years now, and was always able to find work despite refusing to install any sort of screen capture / work hour tracking software. But my last application didn't go well as the employer insisted on screen capture. And while I know why I refused, that got me thinking, does one still has solid chance of acquiring a decently paid contract or a full employment these days without screen track? Is it that employer who is clueless or me? Has the situation changed with the new generations, new reality and all?
Rather than opinions (we all probably still know that capturing a coder's screen is counter productive (I think?)) I'd like some information from those with insight in this area, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
"Hell no" would be very polite compared to what I'd tell them.
Their outlook is cretinous. You should be paid for what you produce, not for how many hours it takes. This assumes, of course, that the requirements don't change. The acceptance testing also needs to be fairly clear from the outset. After that, they leave you alone except for status reports and whatever ongoing discussions are required.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: You should be paid for what you produce, not for how many hours it takes.
I'm working as a contractor right now and I would never knowingly agree to screen capture.
However, you *are* being paid for how many hours it takes, if you're being paid by the hour. The only time it works that you are paid by what you produce is if you are being paid a lump sum for the project.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
