|
Have had the first Pfizer jab (South Africa). The accompanying documentation that was given to me was very clear on potential reactions / risks, and in my mind are perfectly acceptable.
This was based on reported results on literally many millions of delivered shots world wide.
I had no reaction other than a very slight inflammation and no pain of the injection site Neither did my 89-yo mother and her two sisters (both in their 80s). Almost their entire retirement facility has been vaccinated (about 200 people), with no severe reactions reported.
Achieving 'herd immunity' will drastically cut down on the potential of the virus to mutate and produce a more hazardous / infectious variant than what we have seen. High numbers of infected people with high viral loads are a much more productive breeding ground for new variants and new waves of the virus.
I don't see why I or anyone else should be exposed to further risk just because of a minority of ... Well this is a public forum or else I would put down what I really think.
I can't believe how politicized this whole issue has become and how some seemingly intelligent and well-informed people have been caught up in an anti-science / anti-vax fakery.
I can remember back when I started school, vaccination was mandated, for the health of the general population and the individual. No questions asked or expected.
|
|
|
|
|
The US is kinda broken. There's no single source of truth everyone can agree on, and it amazes me they're still somewhat united despite of that.
It's like, they don't get along, they don't believe each other, but they're also fundamentally too lazy and don't care enough to do anything about it.
So, surprisingly, it just works.
|
|
|
|
|
Its a question of risk/benefit. There have been millions of people vaccinated, and just for the record, there is no COVID-19 in the vaccine. (I have had 2 shots of the Pfizer).
Or, you could probably be ok with a double lung transplant.
The numbers are hard to evaluate, "whats the risk of getting covid?", and how bad of a case could you get?
I think the math says most people don't die, or have a double lung transplant.
However, each person has to make the decision. You may not get COVID today, but with all the variants emerging, it stands to reason that eventually, without a vaccine, you are likely to get Covid sooner or later.
Keep It Simple, keep it moving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is very important that Americans are as informed as best they can. Unfortunately, discussion that does NOT conform to the migrating narrative of the CDC is CENSORED.
If you go to the Odysee video share platform and search for Bret Weinstien, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, you can get additional information upon which to make an informed decision for you.
|
|
|
|
|
When you get your shots drink plenty of water before and after. I have read and believe it lessens potential side-effects. I have no direct evidence, it is hard to prove I suppose. I know for a fact it helps potential hangovers.
|
|
|
|
|
You can safely get the shot but only in the eyeball.
If the doctor suggests your arm - run away, he's a quack.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had COVID-19 twice already, and I got my first Pfizer shot a couple of days ago.
There are no safety considerations regarding past exposures.
There is an advisory in effect to not get the shot WHILE you have COVID-19.
Either way, I live in a country of 11 million people with a very honest reporting and after setting about 8 million shots, we've had 467 complications and 21 deaths in total.
We rule any death that might have been vaccine related, as guaranteed vaccine related, for transparency reasons.
I live in Belgium, and we're the only country on earth that does that, because, when our Joe average reads things like that, we think:
That's a pretty good result, I'm gonna sign up for my vaccine today.
Honestly, the vaccine quality is great, and the health risks are very minimal.
There is no reason to not get a vaccine.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: the health risks are very minimal
and if you can still say that in 10 years time I'll have the jab - promise! 
|
|
|
|
|
Please reconsider, if the virus keeps circulating it might mutate beyond our ability to vaccinate against it.
That would suck so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear community,
I wrote a reply... I used controversial words about proven medicines and got this "This message has been flagged as potential spam and is awaiting moderation"
I am very sorry for this community. You are provided blinders by the masters and exploiters of Humanity here... You are infected by a very bad parasite! very sad. Do not submit to the JAB... it and I.T. are not safe and "they" don't want you to see that
blessings
chuck
|
|
|
|
|
Member 14751866 wrote: "This message has been flagged as potential spam and is awaiting moderation"
Everyone with a low-ish post count gets that message. Stop being paranoid, and stop spreading misinformation.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you techie007,
I admit that my anger at the word spam was wrong but I stand by my statements about the pharmaceutical industry being organized crime and Ivermectin being very powerful against severe acute respiratory syndrome. Sure I am paranoid. Paranoia is healthy when surrounded by blind and deaf and dumb people who deny that conspiracy can be. It is irrational to trust that experts are right, that conspiracy is impossible etc and it is rational to question everything and be on the lookout for criminal behaviors.
I'll try and be more specific and polite then thanks
chuck
|
|
|
|
|
Medical experts (ACTUAL EXPERTS, not social media hoax promoters) recommending getting the vaccine after having had COVID-19 because the immune response elicited by the virus is different than that induced by the RNA vaccine and there is evidence that immunity acquired by infection may last a shorter time than that induced by the vaccines.
|
|
|
|
|
My husband got Covid last July. He was sick for about 3 days with fever, achy, couldn't eat. He works for a Hospice group of the local hospital. He got the vaccine this past January (Moderna) and is fine. I think he was just a little lethargic for a day (as I was when I got the vaccine having not gotten Covid.) The biggest challenge was keeping away from him when he got it. I made him stay downstairs and even left his food on the steps. Of course that made me be quarantined as well but that didn't matter to me - I just had to have food delivered. I've been working remotely since 2005 anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
In most of the first world, the recommendation is that people who (know that they) have had COVID should still be vaccinated, because there is some evidence that the vaccine gives additional protection (particularly) against strains of the virus other than that which the individual was infected. While a local reaction (soreness, aching), particularly to the first dose of the vaccine, is more common and may be more severe in someone who has previously had the disease, there is no evidence that more severe vaccine reactions (which are very rare, in any event) are more frequent in such individuals. Consequently, concern that you may previously have had a very mild infection should not prevent you from accepting vaccination. If you have more specific concerns, you should discuss them with a trusted physician. I write this as a physician and volunteer COVID vaccinator.
|
|
|
|
|
If you already had the virus, then your body already has antibodies in your blood which will help you fight off the virus in the future. This is not to say you will not get sick again, however, you will likely not get as sick as if you didn't already have those antibodies in your blood. That's what the vaccine does: it gives you a more mild case of the virus which forces your body to produce the antibodies. So, if you already had the virus, it may not be necessary to get a vaccine (but I'm not an immunologist). Is the vaccine safe? You have to judge that for yourself and understand your own health. I know people who have received the vaccine with no ill effects. However, my sister had a mild heart attack which was related to blood clotting one week after receiving the vaccine. She's 39 years old. Truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has different opinions and have read different articles, but here's where I'm at. Get the vaccine if: 65+ years old and have not had the virus, 75+ years old regardless of having virus, or underlying health condition that makes getting the virus more dangerous. For all other cases, risks associated with the vaccine out weigh the risks of the virus.
|
|
|
|
|
Had the virus, Got both shots, both made me feel like I had the virus again for 1-2 days.
I would say its much better to get the vaccine than the actual virus as I was out for 2 weeks with it.
I did talk with my doc and public health officials they said their was very little risk with getting the shot even after being exposed to the virus.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have already been exposed to the virus and survived, then you have already developed natural immunity to the strain of the Covid-19 virus that infected you. It has been found that new variants do not very enough to re-infect most people with resistance (so far).
Now from a technical standpoint, what I would recommend at this point is to go to a hospital or clinic and get tested to see if you have sufficient immunity not to require a vaccine shot. In this case your medical record would show you have immunity and then you could not be pestered by people over not being vaccinated. However, it is possible that health professionals could still suggest vaccination. If vaccination is recommended by health professionals then it would be a very good idea to go through with it.
|
|
|
|
|
My understanding is that if you've had Covid and get the vaccine then it is no more harmful than if you never had Covid and take the vaccines.
Here's the CDC's take on it. Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccination | CDC[^]
I'm currently job hunting (in the US).
My big fear was that I was going to have to prove I'd gotten my vaccination before I would be allowed to work for my next job.
I have run the numbers given out by the CDC in the US against 2018 deaths as a control and came up with the opinion that the disease is quite deadly, counting as third leading cause of death in the US. Right behind Cancer and Heart disease but so much higher than the next category down that the deaths had to be from a new source.
US Numbers only
All numbers taken from 2018 as the control year except covid
_____________________________________________________________
Heart Disease = 655,381
Cancer = 599,274
Covid = 336,802 <== where covid fits from 2020 as of Dec 31, 2020.
Accidents = 167,127
Chronic lower respiratory diseases = 159,486
Stroke = 147,810
Alzheimer's = 122,019
Diabetes = 84,946
Influenze, Pneumonia (the "flu") = 59,120
Nephritis (nephrotic syndrome, nephrosis) = 51,386
Intentional self-harm (suicide) = 48,344
_____________________________________________________________
Source: CDC and https://covidtracking.com/data/national
You mention that you don't know if you've had the disease, but you know you were exposed. My opinion is that you treat that as if you didn't get the disease since not every exposure results in an infection.
Then make your decision accordingly. My opinion is that the vaccine is the better choice but that's just an opinion. Both sides of this equation are filled with FUD.
I didn't go through everyone's answer but the worry you didn't mention was the effectiveness against new strains of Covid.
Here's a quick article on that.
A Real-World Look at COVID-19 Vaccines Versus New Variants – NIH Director's Blog[^]
It doesn't hurt to take a step back and consider if you had a brother (that you liked) who came to you with the same story you are telling, what would you advise them to do?
|
|
|
|
|
In all of that, I forgot the other compelling reason to consider getting the vaccine.
One of the risks of Covid is that you won't die but you will get long-term effects. A friend of mine who got Covid and survived gets problems just walking to the end of her driveway and back. She now has breathing issues.
My worry is the stories of brain fog and fatigue. For someone in the business of using their brain at a high rate over long periods of time (probably everyone on this site) this would seem to be a factor they should add to their decision-making.
COVID ‘Long Haulers’: Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 | Johns Hopkins Medicine[^]
Good luck with your decision.
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, this isn't really an answer to the question you asked, but is related to it. It is something that I view as important, despite the apparent lack of concern by media and government.
Although I am generally in favor of the vaccine (I drove two of my children in to get their shots), if you are CMV negative, I encourage holding off.
CMV negative blood (only about 15% of the U.S. population, not sure of other countries) can also be used for newborn infants and for immune compromised patients (like cancer patients or HIV patients), whereas CMV positive can not. There is no current research out on how the vaccine affects the usability of blood for these types of patients yet.
If you are CMV negative, I encourage donating blood as frequently as you can, and holding off on getting your vaccination until the research results are out. And, of course, do everything you can to prevent exposure to COVID-19 and other viruses. Any time there is a limited source pool of blood donors, that pool should be protected.
I'll admit that this is a somewhat personal issue to me. My sister has been going through treatments for Leukemia. Before receiving a bone marrow transplant to rebuild her immune system, she underwent very strong chemotherapy to literally wipe her own compromised immune system completely out. During that time, she had to have a lot of blood transfusions to keep her platelet counts up where they needed to be. Her marrow transplant went well, and everything is looking good, but it is a 1 year process to slowly allow the transplanted immune system to take over. During that time, if she needs blood, it will still have to be from CMV negative donations.
I live too far away to directly give her my blood, so I am thankful for those donations that others closer to her made. As a CMV negative donor myself, I make donations as often as I am allowed to, to help patients in my area. If you are curious, you can take a look at the CMV negative page on the American Red Cross site.
Money makes the world go round ... but documentation moves the money.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're under 70 and have less than 3 severe illness preconditions, then the side-effects of the vaccination are probably about as dangerous for you as the infection itself. Plus, the vaccination only trains your antibodies, which are only able to fight the current mutation of the virus, so it needs to be refreshed with every new mutation. That is not immunity in terms of viral respiratory diseases.
Immunity can only be achieved by having an infection every now and then, which trains your T cells and keeps them up-to-date with current and also with future mutations of the Corona virus. As the vaccination temporarily prevents you from being infected and your T cells from being trained, it in fact even weakens your immunity in the long run. And then you will need the next vaccination even more, because the longer you haven't been infected, the more disastrous your next infection will be. And Sars-Cov-2 will not go away, so you *will* have the next infection some day.
So if you're young and healthy: Bet your money on the infection, not on the vaccination.
|
|
|
|
|
Consider getting an antibody test that measures quantity and not just presence.
If you still have lots of antibodies that will help you and your doctor make the decision.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
