|
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As with a spell-checker that doesn't recognize all words, or all forms of all words, so it is with Google lookup. That you found "Comparability Matrix" should reassure you about the expression (assuming your desired incompatibility definition is in line with the given meaning, except for the negation).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I am English from England and speak both English and American fluently.
"Incompatibility" is a perfectly good word. Google Translate is not a comprehensive dictionary of English, but does it's best. However, just because it doesn't know a word or a particular variation of a word, "Compatible" in this case, doesn't mean it is correct and you are not.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't get me started... 
But, no, you're correct in this particular instance.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Phrased another way: your question is: "Is it incompatible?" (mechanic): "Uh, yes".
Versus: "Is it compatible?" (mechanic): No.
People understand "positive" phrasing easier than negative phrasing.
A compatibility matrix would have simple yes's and no's. Yours would be an inversion, at a minimum.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Good point.
But maybe things being incompatible is a Very Bad Thing and you want to highlight the danger of putting them together?
Need more context.
|
|
|
|
|
Google's suggestion is probably based on usage frequency.
Look for something compatible first.
"What have you got that's not incompatible"?
Sounds like a plea in the DIY hardware department.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
The reason using an incompatibility matrix here is simply there are only view combinations needed to be marked as incompatible against thousands of compatibles.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
!Compatibility Matrix 
|
|
|
|
|
At least one 'i' less 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: And while I'm cross checking the above with google, no issues D'Oh! |  Laugh |
This because I used the word "Incompatibility" in the above post always with quotation marks, google seems to skip that 
Easy enough, google works _very_ well
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
Chemists have exactly one rule: there are only exceptions
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Honey the Code Witch got BOTH "Code Project Discussions - Your Say !" entries in today's Daily News.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
It's magic! 
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I think Joan Hunt has done it in the past, but it is pretty rare.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Two 60MB updates in a week and it's nagging me while I'm trying to code. Can't you do rollouts on a monthly schedule or something?
Grr. Microsoft schleps updates at people like they are something they *want*.
Get your #*@( elephant together and establish regular ship dates. 
Real programmers use butterflies
modified 18-Dec-20 12:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the saying "If it's free, you're the product" needs to be revised to include the possibility of you being the guinea pig.
"Elephant" wasn't necessary when $#!+ would've done nicely.
|
|
|
|
|
I mean otherwise I love it. It's one of the best things they ever produced. But just keep to a schedule!
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I am not so certain that is a good idea. The last update of Visual Studio was the worst I have ever received and I still haven't restored full functionality after it. That hosed things up pretty well for me and I refuse to update my other machines since I still have work to do. Hopefully Code has better success with that.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
So what you're saying that you would like the VS Code updates to be socially distanced?
|
|
|
|
|
This sounds like a lot of release cycles:
"We have to release features X/1.0, X/1.1, X/1.2, and X/1.4 immediately!"
"What about X/1.3?"
"It's not passed the Pink Sheep 1.7 suite of tests yet. It absolutely can't be released."
"Ooookaaayyyy..."
24 hours pass, and the app is distributed to $117M worth of customers.
"Oh ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) !"
"WHAT?"
"We just figured out that X/1.4 requires one of the changes in X/1.3 and we didn't release them together."
"So, that just means that X/1.4 doesn't work."
"Yeah, but the default behavior on X/1.4 failure is to re-init the customer's data base back to W/0.7 levels. Everything they've done over the last 18 months is lost."
"We are truly ed..."
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
What time (in UTC for easy calculations, please)?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
