|
You're off my Christmas list.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If it's any consolation, I have one user on my domain whose mailbox limit is currently 5GB, and I'll have to extend it soon as she's up to 83% full ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't be easier to ask her to delete some things?
Be careful, outlook used to have problems managing big pst files (4 Gb or so)
I don't know the new versions though
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest thing is to do nothing. Then the problem will soon take care of itself.
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried that before - it doesn't help as she can't decide what to get rid of ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
My previous employer did an end run around that by banning local PST files, configuring the main serverside inbox to delete everything after a fixed period of time (6 months?), and creating a new serverside archival folder that started empty and had a relatively small cap (100mb) and then left it to employees to figure out what to save.  Naturally no overhead was allowed to be charged for doing so. 
The bitter cynics - aka everyone still there - called it the evidence destruction policy behind senior managements back because we were convinced it was being driven in a reaction to previous legal problems. (The top lobbyist for our late congressvermin turned out to be a crook and the feds decided to look at all his clients.)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Wow - I learned a new word this morning - niggle.Something that causes slight but persistent annoyance, discomfort, or anxiety.
|
|
|
|
|
Which version of Outlook? I'm using 2019 - confusingly called "version 2010", build 13328.20292 - and the search box in the titlebar works OK.
If you search from the Inbox, it defaults to "current mailbox", but you can change that from the ribbon or the drop-down within the box. For any other folder, it defaults to "current folder".
Both the ribbon and the drop-down within the search box have additional options, so you don't have to remember the syntax for eg: finding email from a specific person.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I see now.
You have to click in the search box and then notice that the background has added a Search tab to the ribbon which contains the options.
Not something I would promote as New and Improved. New and Unexpected, maybe.
C'est la vie
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have been using it for months and never noticed that Search tab.
Thanks for pointing it out.
|
|
|
|
|
The "Search" ribbon only appears when I click in the search field or select a mail folder. When I leave those fields, it goes away. It would be nice if we could make the search tools option a permanent part of outlook's ribbon.
|
|
|
|
|
I confirmed your latest message as spam when it came up in moderation a few minutes ago because the link to your app would be seen as that, even if you did not intend it that way.
However, I haven't reported you as a spammer because I don't believe (based on your history) that this was a deliberate attempt.
Many of our members are a lot more trigger-happy than I, though - so it's probably a good idea to not post app links, no matter how proud of your code you are ...
You may find that for a short time, all your posts go to moderation - this is normal as the spam detector is designed to protect us from people who experiment with different ways to get their crap though! 
Please feel free to post the message again - but without the link, this time?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Fine. I understand.
But since I no longer have the text of the reply to which you refer I think I shall just let it go.
|
|
|
|
|
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I guess they should've added a flashy new icon to call out the change. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Mine is Insider 13430, and works as you have described. A bit distracting that the dropdown from the top hides part of the ribbon which changed to Search.
Works much better than my workplace O2010/Exchange combo.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that.
I hadn't notices the search ribbon before and I've been using it a while now. It's the drop down that hides it.
|
|
|
|
|
In our organisation, we have been told to hold off use of new outlook for Mac.
Quote: There are several existing features not supported by this new experience that may lead to issues with delegates, shared mailbox access, and online archiving
I think it's released but a Beta version.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: from a single person whom I get about a billion emails a week from
Oops, sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
|
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Google vs Microsoft!
But we aren’t going to have any political discussions today!
Suuuurrrrre!!!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search Options - When possible,display results as the query is typed. Do you have this ticked?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: No option to restrict the search to "this folder" instead of "this mailbox" (which massively improves performance)
Hmmm. Mine allows me to restrict it to "Current Folder" as well as other options, once the down arrow next to "Current Mailbox" is clicked
|
|
|
|
|
I gave up a VERY long time ago on the default search in Outlook.
Somewhere back around Office 2007 they hid the Advanced Search feature (removed it from the menu).
I found that you still can get to it with <ctrl><shift><f>.
Haven't used anything other that that search.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
