|
That's kinda a relief ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Building on OG's suggestion
In summary, otolaryngologist - Ear Nose Throat doctor or ENT
male - not sure about this
works alone - singular , not plural
making sense of bugs
Entomological
(of or relating to the biological science of entomology)
// TODO: insert something here
|
|
|
|
|
Got it! You're up tomorrow 
In summary (next phrase is initials)
Male otolaryngologist (Ear, Nose + Throat) = ENT (man)
works alone (One Man Operated) = OMO
makes sense = LOGICAL
ENTOMOLOGICAL = of bugs
The contentious bit might be "OMO" I guess. "One man operated" used to be a common phrase, typically relating to public transport but not exclusively so. I remember when the old buses started to be phased out, the new ones all had "This is an OMO bus, please have your change ready" at the door. When political correctness started to take hold, it was sometimes expressed as "OMO / OWO" but now the terminology tends to be simply "single-crewed". But it was to comply with PC that I added the "male" prefix, so as not to lead people to ENTOWOLOGICAL
I'd hoped that even without the OMO bit there was enough there to get to the answer with confidence.
|
|
|
|
|
 Oh dear, didn't expect that. I'm only starting to get a glimmer of understanding these CC's.
I've never made one up before, will give it my best shot.
Feedback be definitely be welcomed (please) ...
// TODO: insert something here
|
|
|
|
|
yacCarsten wrote: Oh dear, didn't expect that.
Don't panic; it's not the Spanish Inquisition[^] after all
|
|
|
|
|
From where i can learn programming in discount please suggest me
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can't really answer that except in the broadest terms: we have no idea what is available near you so "in discount" (which I assume means "really, really cheap") isn't anything we can evaluate for you.
So in broad terms:
1) The best way to learn programming is via a course: that way if you don't understand, the tutor can rephrase and explain until you do. It is possible there may be free or subsidised courses near you but that would be up to you to check.
2) The next best way is via a book - Addison Wesley, Wrox, and Microsoft press so good ones - this needs you to read the whole thing from start to finish and complete every exercise yourself in order to get anywhere useful. Ignoring the exercises or hunting for internet solutions won't teach you anything!
3) The first worst way is to get a compiler and wing it. Guess what the language works like, guess what you have to do. About as effective as learning to drive by stealing a car and hoping it doesn't crash and burn.
4) The worst way is via YouTube: finding any development videos that aren't made by idiots is a major challenge. Most of 'em are produced by people who have no idea how to make a video, and even less idea how to code. Avoid, they are there for subscribers and monetization.
Needless to say, generally speaking the costs go the other way: a course is most expensive, youtube is cheapest. But you do get what you pay for ... most of the time! As mentioned there may be cheap / free courses available locally, and libraries often have access to nationwide book lists and can sometimes provide loans of technical books if asked really nicely.
You will need to decide on a lot of things before you launch into learning to code: Languages, frameworks, environments: there are a lot of them, and selecting the right ones can be difficult. I'd suggest learning C#, under .NET, for Console and later Winforms as the simplest "starter" set: it'll give you access to a lot of employment positions when you have some experience.
One thing to note: this is not going to be a quick process, regardless of which route you go. Learning how to code is hard work, and it takes time - there is a huge amount you need to know to be effective, and your "way of thinking" has be be expanded to be at all effective.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
What he said.
I have been programming since 1975 and I am still learning.
If you think it is going to be quick and easy, think again.
Good luck, if you "get it", it'll be fun!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, very true.
Me, I have I never had any sort of "programming course" except for a tiny bit of COBOL, PASCAL and FORTRAN when I was studying to get an engineering degree in electronics (telecommunication).
Still, I have been programming since 1980 and like you I am still learning things. In fact, if I didn't I would have been out of the business a long time ago. 40 years of relentless evolution is something you can't ignore. If you do you might as will give it up as you will become obsolete in no time flat.
As to it being easy: no it is not. If you get the hand of it though it never becomes boring.
|
|
|
|
|
You can learn from various free blogs and tutorials.
Try googling "learn programming" or "learn [language]".
When you realize that programming is a very big umbrella term for various languages and technologies, you'll be better equipped to find the type of programming and language you want to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
John Bardeen wrote: discount
google.com is free.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
ZurdoDev wrote: google.com is free
LMFTFY...
codeproject.com is free 
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
W3 Schools[^] is a great boot-strap start. I used it to add HTML, CSS, JavaScript and PHP to my languages and use all of that, now, to keep the backbone of a company with 400+ employees rolling along.
You can get yourself to where you can use the languages comfortably but do not have illusions: no matter where you learn any language, there is no substitute for the struggle in the beginning where you really learn the language and how to add to your knowledge on your own.
I've never taken a course of any type in computing - and this is not unique to me as a professional programmer (i.e., well paid to make real software). To learn programming in it this way, on your own, you need to love what you're doing.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decide on something relatively simple you want to do. Then decide on what you want to run it on. There are free development environments (IDE) for most platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
That's like asking what you should have for supper (and we don't even know what you like).
"Programming" has enough paths that there is no general recommendation. You make some broad decisions then ask the question again.
e.g. What do I want to get involved in?
AI
Gaming
ERP
Mobile
VR
Big Data
SCADA
Quantum Computing
etc.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I would agree with OG mostly.
I would add that sometimes for a nominal fee(for me at least) you can use linkedin learning or udemy or another video/book/course site and learn a new language. This is quite often my preferred way to learn a new language. However I have more than a few languages under my belt and don't consider a new one all that cumbersome. At least with one of the paid sites you actually get fairly decent content. I agree with OG that youtube videos are a case of you get what you pay for.
with that being said. If you are completely new to coding. Take a class from someone that can be a mentor to you while you try to get the interface installed.
To err is human to really mess up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
(Note: disclaimer is at the end)
There was a blip in reported covid cases in the UK as the system used to report the data to the government systems didn't work for a day so the results were rolled into the next batch of reported data. The cause of the blip was that the people collecting the results sent the data to the government systems using XLS files and due to the increasing number of cases the data exceeded the capacity for XLS files so they had to rejig the system to batch the data instead of putting it all in one file.
As software engineers we can all agree there are issues here but as we're not privy to the inners of the system we can only guess at why certain decisions were made. If I was sending raw data to a third party system with (presumably) no API then I'd choose CSV files. However if the data was intended for human consumption then Excel is probably a decent solution. Rather than just raw numbers in cells it can have descriptive meta info at the top such as the source of the data, date it was taken on and so on, then the data itself in rows below. Another reason they might use XLS files is that it's easier to handle quotes, commas and other funny data, letting the proprietary format handle those issues, and while there are existing CSV frameworks that support that data off the shelf you have to bear in mind the time pressures to get this system working and the potential red tape etc in using a project written by some random that they found on github in a government system.
Regardless of the reasons XLS files were used there were obvious failings in that no-one thought to test the capacity of the system so too many assumptions and no thinking about the long-game. So yeah there are flaws here obviously.
What is annoying me though is the way this has been reported and reacted to on places like twitter, where you normally find nothing but well-informed, intellectually honest, non-partisan debate. 99.99% of posts I have seen about this have been of the same ilk, obviously written by people who don't understand the tech. The prevailing narrative being pushed is that the data is stored in Excel files rather than a database. However if that was the case then the data that was missed on the fateful day would probably be lost forever. The fact that it was produced later on in multiple files rather than one demonstrates that the data is indeed stored elsewhere and simply packed in XLS files for distribution to interested parties. No developer, no matter how poor, would really suggest to store data in Excel.
The next most common argument you see is that they are using an "old" version of Excel due to the storage limits encountered. Again as developers I'm sure we can all agree that if we needed to generate an XLS file from data, using Excel to do this would be the last solution we'd use. It is far more likely another method was used such as Odbc drivers or one of the third-party solutions more suited to automation.
Other arguments are over the cost, as if using XLS files to send data has some kind of major effect on costs, the implication being that the whole system is just an Excel spreadsheet that someone maintains, ignoring the costs of everything else that will be involved, not just the cost of software and licenses but the salaries of the people who built in.
It's just maddening seeing so much speculation and ill-informed opinions posted as facts, it must be awful if you actually worked on that system, seeing so many people post so much wrong information and just having to sit there and do nothing, as one of the issues with twitter is that there is no single person or thread to respond to, it is just a wall of people all posting the same thing with nothing you can do to counter it.
Disclaimer: I hope this thread is ok to post in the lounge, I'm NOT looking to discuss tracing in general, if it is effective, how effective any government has been in handling this, good or bad, this is simply about a rather public failing in software system.
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: What is annoying me though is the way this has been reported and reacted to on places like twitter, where you normally find nothing but well-informed, intellectually honest, non-partisan debate.
Too good!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: on places like twitter, where you normally find nothing but well-informed, intellectually honest, non-partisan debate.
I didn't know they had Twitter on planet Vulcan. Not sure why a species that is guided by logic would need Twitter or even know how to use it, given here on planet Earth Twitter is used for misinformation, lies, social engineering, manipulation and emotional outbursts, but what do I know.
|
|
|
|
|
But ... but ... it's a World-Beating System! The government says so, and it wouldn't lie to us!
You will note however, that I haven't trusted the rapidly developed app enough to let it near my phone ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
They could just share the Excel file with everyone and ask us to add our name to it if we get sick.
Our government is so incompetent I'm actually quite suprised they didn't do this.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean you didn't get your copy?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wastedtalent wrote: Our government is so incompetent
Yes blame the politicians. But we often forget that they don't do any of the actual work. The real numpties are the civil servants and the overpaid consultants.
|
|
|
|
|
Yammered on and on for weeks about getting something like 40% of people to download and install it, were slippery with the privacy details, developed it with less skill and time than an intern making thickshakes at McDonalds and then wondered why we wouldn't bother..
Why can't our politicians be good 'nuff for government work? 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
