Re: An activeX in C# - C# Discussion Boards

misterbear5-Aug-03 0:46

5-Aug-03 0:46

I should mention that when I test with other applications, i.e. MS Word, this doesn't happen so I don't believe I should blame the printer...

Remoting

Ivan Fernandez5-Aug-03 0:27

Ivan Fernandez

5-Aug-03 0:27

Hi!!

I've got a problem with remoting that I don't understand...
Could you explain me what happend with this code?? When I unregister the channel and try to get the object again, the code throws an exception... Frown | :(

tCreador = (Creador)Activator.GetObject(tType,"tcp://localhost:8082/Creador");

System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.IChannel[] chns1 = ChannelServices.RegisteredChannels;

ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(chns1[0]);

tCreador = (Creador)Activator.GetObject(tType,"tcp://localhost:8082/Creador");

Regards,

Iván.

Iván Fernández

Re: Remoting

Valeria Bogdevich5-Aug-03 2:55

Valeria Bogdevich

5-Aug-03 2:55

If you unregistered channel, Client doesn't have means "to talk" to Server.
It's the same if would you tried to get reference to object without registering any channel.
You have to register channel again before the call of
Activator.GetObject.

"...hasn't really been well accepted ... as the ratings tell us so far " - Nishant S

An activeX in C#

mrpink5-Aug-03 0:27

mrpink

5-Aug-03 0:27

I'm trying to make an activeX component in C#. From what I see in the article 'writting a COM object in c#', C# libraries are actually ActiveX objects !

But when I try to use them with the ActiveX Control Test Container, it simply fails to load them !

Geee !!!!!
Bad ! What is wrong here ?
and the regsrv32 does not want to register it, does not look like an activex to me !

Cheers, Pierre

Re: An activeX in C#

Anonymously5-Aug-03 1:04

Anonymously

5-Aug-03 1:04

mrpink wrote:
C# libraries are actually ActiveX objects

I don't think that's a correct statement, otherwise you will be able to see all the C# objects in the windows registry. But there could be a way to expose C# objects as COM objects.

Re: An activeX in C#

p daddy5-Aug-03 3:38

p daddy

5-Aug-03 3:38

Instead of regsvr32.exe you need to use regasm.exe.

More info on MSDN:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/cptools/html/cpgrfassemblyregistrationtoolregasmexe.asp[^]

Re: An activeX in C#

mrpink5-Aug-03 4:29

mrpink

5-Aug-03 4:29

This works fine !!!

Excellent, it is registered now ! The trick is that in the test container, it is hidden in a .Net section (so need to check a box to see it !)

Ok ! The problem is that it does not work then .. when added to the container : "Unspecified Idea" !!!!!

Do you have any idea how I can trap .. watch the error ?

Cheers,
Pierre.

Re: An activeX in C#

Stephane Rodriguez.5-Aug-03 4:46

Stephane Rodriguez.

5-Aug-03 4:46

There is no tool to help to do this using .NET, at least currently : we have tlbimp.exe, tlbexp.exe, aximp.exe. And guess what, we don't have axexp.exe.

Basically you need to export an object which exposes the common interfaces exposed by an ActiveX object, which are IOleObject, IOleControl, IDispatch just to name the few mandatory ones.

Exposing interfaces is not hard, tlbexp.exe does all the work.

But you have to create an object, which inherits those interfaces. At this point, if I was asked to do just that, I would try to derive the axhost class (winforms namespace), which is the base class used when it comes to instantiating ActiveX objects.

May be you are even better off writing everything from scratch.

To know what interfaces to implement, and to see the wonderful thing appear in the Control Test Container, I would recommend an old Fritz Onion article[^].

RSS feed

Re: An activeX in C#

mrpink5-Aug-03 6:03

mrpink

5-Aug-03 6:03

WAAARF !! This sounds awfully complex to me !!!

Thanks !

Re: An activeX in C#

Stephane Rodriguez.6-Aug-03 2:22

Stephane Rodriguez.

6-Aug-03 2:22

Sorry guy, here is how to do it :

http://www.codeproject.com/cs/miscctrl/exposingdotnetcontrols.asp

RSS feed

i,Remtoing

Ivan Fernandez5-Aug-03 0:24

Ivan Fernandez

5-Aug-03 0:24

H
Iván Fernández

Creating child window

S O S5-Aug-03 0:07

S O S

5-Aug-03 0:07

How can I create a form as a child window of another form?

Re: Creating child window

Furty5-Aug-03 0:54

Furty

5-Aug-03 0:54

Assuming your child form is called Form2, and this code is being called from another form:

Form2 form2 = new Form2();<br />
form2.Parent = this; // form2 is now a child of this form<br />
// show form 2

Or, if Form2 is to be displayed as a dialog box:

Form2 form2 = new Form2(this)<br />
// show form 2

Re: Creating child window

S O S5-Aug-03 4:19

S O S

5-Aug-03 4:19

Well, method 1 gives me:

An unhandled exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' occurred in system.windows.forms.dll

Additional information: Cannot add a top level control to a control.

And neither my own form nor the System.Windows.Forms.Form class has a (Form) constructor...

Re: Creating child window

Arun Bhalla5-Aug-03 5:37

Arun Bhalla

5-Aug-03 5:37

Set the new Form's TopLevel property to false before you make it Visible or Show() it.

Re: Creating child window

S O S5-Aug-03 10:04

S O S

5-Aug-03 10:04

Thanks! That worked.

However, the window is created with the WS_CHILD style, which makes it be "inside" the main window. This I do not want. How can I make it not use the WS_CHILD style, but still have the main window as its parent? I don't see any place to specify the window styles manually...

Re: Creating child window

Arun Bhalla5-Aug-03 10:37

Arun Bhalla

5-Aug-03 10:37

Hmm, also try

TopMost = true;

in addition to

TopLevel = false;

DataSets vs Serviced Component

schockp4-Aug-03 22:14

schockp

4-Aug-03 22:14

Hello,

I'm experiencing a problem with DataSets. If I use a DataSet as a parameter of a method in a Serviced Component, I always receive an InvalidCastException because something is trying to convert __ComObject to DataSet. When a method only returns a DataSet (no DataSet as parameter) there's no problem.

I'm running my application with framework 1.1, the serviced component is in Server mode.

Is this some bug in the .Net framework? Confused | :confused:

Has anyone a solution or a workaround for this problem?

best regards,
Pieter

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

Ista5-Aug-03 9:34

Ista

5-Aug-03 9:34

I don't know the answer but does the dataset serialize. You might have to implement the serializable interface. or just shoot it as an xml stream through. Com passes it as a stream anyhow.

I'm not an expert yet, but I play one at work. Yeah and here too.

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

schockp5-Aug-03 21:06

schockp

5-Aug-03 21:06

Thanks for replying. I'm not sure if a dataset is serializable, I'll check it out.

Running the component in Library mode doesn't have this problem, although there's a problem with my database connection. But that's some security issue I think.

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

Ista6-Aug-03 4:26

Ista

6-Aug-03 4:26

it might be easier to parse it as xml "WriteXML() method" then send it through

I'm not an expert yet, but I play one at work. Yeah and here too.

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

schockp6-Aug-03 4:32

schockp

6-Aug-03 4:32

I think that the dataset-to-xml and xml-to-dataset coversion will cause a significant performance drop.

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

Jarrod Marshall6-Aug-03 7:40

Jarrod Marshall

6-Aug-03 7:40

I ran into this problem working with C# based queued components.
Datasets are serializable, they support ISerializable however alot of things with COM+ (especially with Queued Components) is that they need the components to support IPersist.

They have no idea how to serialize using the ISerializable interface therefore you either go the route of dataset--> XML, XML--> dataset or implement IPersist within your component.

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

schockp6-Aug-03 20:46

schockp

6-Aug-03 20:46

Jarrod,

Thanks, I'll take a look at how to implement the IPersist interface.

Pieter

Re: DataSets vs Serviced Component

Ista6-Aug-03 10:26

Ista

6-Aug-03 10:26

Well its relatively fast and uses a buffered stream. I mean really when your marshalling your Dataset you serialize the object to text then back again. And its basically the same thing. WriteXML is the fastest firehose method of the class. But yeah it would be better to do a dataset. You might try createing an object, clone the dataset to that object then marshalling it over the boundary. That might work. Or use the serializable attribute above a custom class that inherits the dataset.

Personally, With DataSets I use reflection to populate classes then update them with COM+ life cycles. Much more elegant and easier to load balance. That and business rules on forms and behind the scenes are simple to implement.

nick

I'm not an expert yet, but I play one at work. Yeah and here too.

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.