|
I read that years ago. And ever since I have met at least one every week.
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: (it also helps that social media brings stupid right to your front door now)
At least a good firewall can help to be your first line of defense. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram...all of that crap is blocked right in my router, so no device on my LAN could follow a link and end up there even if it tried to.
But yeah, "social media" is still a rather broad definition...
|
|
|
|
|
Ia not the CP Lounge a form of soc . . .
Oh dear - I'm about to have my account cancelled.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Always, it's just a lot easier to see it with the explosion of social media and "news" channels. Unfortunately, the idiots get more of the press ... although it has always been the case that the sensational is highlighted over the ordinary.
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss.
Lazarus Long, "Time Enough For Love" by Robert A. Heinlein
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: "Were people always this stupid or has the gene pool utterly failed?"
People seem to be getting much dumber but I don't think I'm on the same side as you on this one. But since you didn't really make a stance, it's hard to tell. 
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: far too many people are ready to listen and learn as long it's what they want to hear and believe.
Nobody changes until they change. It's true for everyone.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: I'll offer a rhetorical question: "Were people always this stupid or has the gene pool utterly failed?"
I'll answer that like it isn't;
Yes, we were always this stupid. Evolution does not work towards intelligence, nor does it particularly reward that. You can't eat intelligence during a famine. It doesn't make you immune. And it doesn't guarantee a next generation of your genes.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Two things. Firstly, although we all assume it's innate, I'm not sure people are born with common sense. Most acquire decent quantities fairly quickly, but it goes on being accumulated, silently and effortlessly, throughout life. Thus as we get older, we look at others and think "where is their common sense" because they've not yet learnt things that to us are just common sense.
But secondly, common sense is these days being "taught out" of people. For example, in my youth, it was "common sense" not to cross the road without looking carefully. If you didn't, you'd likely get hit by a car and you would die - or at least be maimed for life. But then we made cars "better" so that these days when you're hit by a car, you don't get spiked on a mascot, the bonnet is a crumple zone, the tires so wide that they can drive over you without breaking bones. You get pain relief within minutes (in the "old days" if you survived, you were thrown unceremoniously in the back of an ambulance by a "driver" (not a medic) and taken to hospital a.s.a.p - which in itself was often enough to kill you off). Then modern surgery "fixes" you, you get time off work, and you sue the driver, or the Council, or anybody else who might have been around (or absent) at the time, and benefit from your good fortune. That sort of experience can undo "common sense" pretty effectively. We have so much "Health and Safety" and so many social, financial and other "safety nets" around us that common sense is either un-learned or not learnt in the first place. Without (visible) consequences to our actions, we remain in a state of ignorant bliss.
|
|
|
|
|
LMMO: Laugh my mask off.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
What the he** have you got to laugh about these days? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I really tried to come up with a joke about social distancing, but this is as close as I could get.
|
|
|
|
|
LOL. I wouldn't dare come too close to you. You have guns - and as far as I know no scruples about firing twice! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you need to fire twice?
|
|
|
|
|
One step effectively looks good, we hear (9)
Stairwell
One step - stair
Effectively - well
Looks good - stare well - hear - stairwell
modified 13-May-20 9:27am.
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook: this time, switching from Live Mail to Outlook has been fairly painless, with a couple of annoyances. Big, pointless annoyances.
1) Dear Microsoft, in every browser on the planet, "Refresh" is F5. In Live Mail (one of your own apps, if you remember - produced by "cutting down" Outlook Express back in the days when you killed it), "Send / Receive" is also F5. This is sensible, useful. CONSISTENT. So what is it in Outlook?
F9.
What so very, very useful function does F5 do that it couldn't be used? "Update a list of contact group members."
WTE?
Can I find out how to change it? No ... it looks like that's not an option at all ...
2) When you give me a list of columns I can display, and the titles are all in CamelCase, please display them as CamelCase on my display as columns INSTEAD OF SHOUTING THEM AT ME.
3) When you give me a list of columns I can display, and give it a heading "Show these columns in this order" and let me move items up and down, don't ignore that I put "Flag status" right at the top and show it at the right hand end of the display! I want that on the left for an ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing reason!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, and if anyone knows how to stop every single message it displays taking an extra line to display "<This item contains active content that cannot be displayed. Open the item to read its contents.>" then please let me know - I'd love the display space back ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried View ⇒ Current View ⇒ Message Preview ⇒ Off?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
YAY! That did it! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
gmail, and call it a day? 
|
|
|
|
|
Griff's problem is with Outlook, aka the desktop email client. It can connect to gmail, but the problem will remain the same, wherever the mail is coming from.
Surely you're not suggesting a web interface for email as an alternative, right? Especially gmail's...
|
|
|
|
|
of course. I love gmail. I use it all the time and have been for years.
I also use Outlook at work exclusively and Outlook sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Google proudly announced gmail back in the day as email "re-invented"...with their own spin on it. That's what I've never gotten used to.
To say nothing of the fact that it's being run by a company whose very existence is all about profiling users. I feel rather strongly that the company showing me ads shouldn't be allowed to scrutinize my mail and determine what I discuss and with whom.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft profiles users too; they all do.
To think one is less evil than the other, is silly.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, but the important difference here is that without its profiling business, there's no Google.
In Microsoft's case, the ad business its profiling is based upon amounts to a rather small hill of beans.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
