|
Microsoft profiles users too; they all do.
To think one is less evil than the other, is silly.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, but the important difference here is that without its profiling business, there's no Google.
In Microsoft's case, the ad business its profiling is based upon amounts to a rather small hill of beans.
|
|
|
|
|
Not to keep this debate going any longer, but Google does have real, usable software too, you know that right? profiling or no profiling, they are a software company, just like Microsoft, albeit, most of their software is free to use, but it is software that works well, none the less.
BTW, I am not a Google fanboi, and I don't align with them politically and I detest a lot of their methods, but some of their software is just damn good.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: they are a software company, just like Microsoft, albeit, most of their software is free to use
That's exactly what most people believe. Their software is free, nobody pays for it, yet they manage to keep the company afloat.
Google's an ad company. That's what supports their free software and all their other expenses. Not the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
4: Ctrl + F. WTF??? (Unless it has been changed since 2010 version.)
|
|
|
|
|
You. Are. ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing. Kidding. Me. 
No, it hasn't changed. At least CTRL+N does what you expect ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Considering what Ctrl+F does, I expect Ctrl+N to do something like reboot the computer.  
|
|
|
|
|
... and bought Office 2019.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry - but Live Mail / LibreOffice just wasn't cutting it any more, as show by the "two hour email" debacle recently when nothing ing worked to produce a simple formatted email, and the more I tried, the more frustrated I got.
Live Mail I can excuse: it's a free, basic product and it does free, basic stuff really well. But LibreOffice Writer faffing with formatting every time I did anything just was the final straw: I'm fed up with every update destroying my Task Bar file history, I'm fed up with UI-Breaking changes that never get reflected in the documentation. I'm fed up with "rock star programmers" who can't be assed to fix bugs, but add a feature that works for their exact need, and breaks something else. In short, I no longer believe that the OpenSource model works for large projects.
So, it's back to Office ... 
First impressions aren't good. Open Word and you get an understandable messagebox:
Microsoft Word isn't your default program for viewing and editing documents.
Do you want to select the files types that Word should open? That's good - instead of grabbing everything it can sort-of cope with and annoying the heck out of me later, it wants to give the the option. "Yes".
To change your default apps, go to Settings > Apps > Default Apps .
"OK"
Nothing happens, it doesn't even try to open it for you ...
So you open StartButton ... Settings ... Apps ... Default Apps, and ... nothing there directly lists Word documents (or spreadsheets, or ...) , again.
Best I can come up with is "Choose default apps by file type" which for a "normal user" is probably pretty scary when it eventually appears, especially as MS has been hiding file extensions since Win7 and most users have probably never seen one, much less knows what they are for ... even I'm not sure about some of 'em!
That's not a good start: "You need to do this; now p*ss off and do it because I'm not going to help you, and gawd help you if you get it wrong". Is it only me that remembers a dialog with a "I can handle these, which do you want to you open automatically for you?" list being shown, so you could select the important ones?
So I decide that for the moment, it can have DOC and DOCX only, and scroll down to them.
They are both already assigned to Word.
So the whole ing message was a load of b*ll*cks and it did it without bl**dy asking! 
Microsoft, that's worse than doing nothing - because that's telling me "we're pretending to care about your system integrity, but we just screwed you over in the background and lied about it."
This experience had better get better, Microsoft, you're on thin ice allready...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
This has nothing to do with Word or MSOffice, but the new insane mapping of file types with their local corresponding applications.
The people at Microsoft who came up with that BS have probably never used a computer in their life - To me, this is definitely one of my top ten PITA of windows 10.
|
|
|
|
|
did you buy 2019 or buy the sub? (heard they were intending to kill off the one-time buy).
actually if you have a few people using it the 5 machines sub (even if not the same physical household) is not too bad.
Edit: Oh be careful, msoffice loves to default to saving EVERYTHING on one drivel
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, CCP
|
|
|
|
|
I bought 2019 - I'm not a fan of subscription software models.
I'm the only user - Herself has no idea how to even turn on the printer, much less create a spreadsheet.
And I'm pretty sure I'll slap Office silly to remind it that my NAS is where stuff goes very shortly ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The sub is even better than that - each of the 5 people can use Office and each can be signed on to up to 5 different devices; I've got it on my laptop, my desktop, my Surface Pro and my iPad Pro, it's installed on my wife's laptop as user #2, and I still have 3 more shares to hand out. I bought it figuring the other 3 would be my kids, but they all prefer other packages, so my dad, a brother and a sister-in-law are going to get them instead.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just trying LibreOffice, your post is not encouraging.
I consider the equation editor of LibreOffice far better thant the MS one.
Excel looks better then Calc, but no issues with the latter, for the moment.
Quote: I no longer believe that the OpenSource model works for large projects.
There's gcc, you know.
|
|
|
|
|
It is good - especially for the price ... but just get used to ignoring updates, and you should be fine. Calc is excellent (Excel has always been better overall, but with niggles).
It's just the "accumulation of bruises" I've built up with LibreOffice that has driven me from it to a "paid for solution", in the same way that GIMP just isn't as good as PaintShop Pro.
I think the problem is a lack of coordination, of overall strategy - not than this is something MS is good at providing either ...
Come back AmiPro! There was nothing to forgive! (Apart from your habit of crashing when auto-saving my work, that is - that was unforgivable.)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
This box that I'm on now, bought as a refurb, has Libre. It's a little different than the MS Word they standardize on at the office but it works with their files (and, when so set, vise-versa).
Sure, it has a few things that annoy (and surprise). Some of the font's don't quite space right in Calc; putting 1/4 into a cell, formatted as a date, gives Jan 4 #### (current year). Works every day . . . except 3/4 . Which reformat's to the single-char 3/4. Just discovered: if I push ESC it formats properly.
On the other hand, Office Outlook keeps taking a nap whilst composing, of various lengths on most days - as it spins its little wheel - often long enough where one gives up and restarts. It does know how to format 3/4 to a date when appropriate.
Now - for the price - I'm willing to be hassled by Libre more than by Office.
As for a remote subscription - what if the Internet's down? Notepad++, I suppose.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: bought Office 2019.
Where and how did you buy it? I only see option for that 365 BS
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just do it the way you've been doing it since Windows 95:
Right-click on a file of the type you want Word to open
Open With...
Pick winword.exe from the list
End of story
The UI sucks more and more with every new version, but the underpinnings haven't changed in 25 years.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: This experience had better get better, Microsoft, you're on thin ice allready...
So you'll switch to...Linux, and LibreOffice? Oh, wait...
This is me with the phone situation. The more I use watch others use Android, the more horrifying I find it. And I refuse to give Apple any money for any of its offerings. Honestly, what are my options, at this point?
Meanwhile, my Windows Phone lives on. I know it'll die eventually, and I'm utterly unimpressed by the alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
As Nixrocks said in an article I read,
Quote: MS keeps re-inventing the wheel over and over and over again, but instead of creating a round wheel, they just use random non-round shapes as they redesign, rejecting all feedback from their customers that just want a round wheel. Worse, the leadership has gone on record basically saying that the round wheel is obsolete and they will never return to it. "Clearly the ride quality with Microsoft triangle wheels is a user problem, users just need more training to understand just how awesome our triangle wheels are."
I came across another instance almost equivalent to your 'default app' scenario yesterday. I have Office 2010 with OneNote. I like OneNote's ability to keep a log which I can access on either my phone or through the web, but a few months ago MS decided to screw OneNote 2010 users by disabling OneDrive's OneNote connectivity. Searching around, I saw that MS offered a free retail upgrade to OneNote 2016, and searching around more I found the link on their site. Tried it, and it installed.
Went to run it, and it said that the user name I supplied is not in their database. It was the same one I used for Windows Live, which was how I connected every other time, and how I was simultaneously connected online to the OneNote file. So I figured I was out of luck, and they were now only allowing subscriptions. Out of curiosity I tried OneNote's online link 'Open in App,' and it allowed me to select the new installation. And that allowed me to accept their terms, and get OneNote up and running, which I couldn't do any other way.
 
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have experience running Coverity within Visual Studio? If you use their software to build your open-source code and submit it, they'll analyze it. I've heard good things about their tool and want to try it out. Right now this is where I'm at:
- I go to their download page[^] and get the .zip file for Win64.
- When extracting the .zip file, I get numerous “Error 0x80010135: Path too long” errors. I look this up online and learn that I have to use a different extraction tool. OK, I have 7-Zip.
- 7-Zip extracts it in 80 seconds, whereas Windows failed after beavering away for what, 10 minutes?! FPoS.
- The next instruction is “Add the bin directory to your path”. Presumably “bin directory” refers to an extracted directory with executables. OK, I find it. But I have no idea what “your path” refers to. My project folder, the one that maps to its top-level folder on GitHub? Right now this is where I’m stuck.
- Next, I’d have to figure out how to configure the tool for Microsoft’s C++ compiler using some command line stuff. The download page says to refer to coverity build tool/docs/en/help/cov-configure.txt for help. But there's no sign of a /docs folder in the extracted folder or its subfolders.
- Finally, I’d have to do a build using command line stuff that I’ve never had to bother with, because Visual Studio takes care of it all when you click on “Build Solution”.
If anyone has gone through this and can help, I'd appreciate it. We can take this to the Product Lifecycle/Free Tools[^] forum if that would be more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Off top of my head I can help only with point 4: Add the path of the bin folder to your PATH environment variable (start > type "env" > Edit Environment variables > "environment variables" button > Select "Path" variable > append ";<your bin="" path="">")
|
|
|
|
|
Never used that tool before but a reference for command line for #6: MSBuild Command-Line Reference - Visual Studio | Microsoft Docs
Just point it to the .vcxproj file for your C++ project. If you need to add or change a property you can do it in the file (there should already be PropertyGroups in the file as a template) or use the -property/p switch for something like configuration (e.g. -p:Configuration=Release).
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: - 7-Zip extracts it in 80 seconds, whereas Windows failed after beavering away for what, 10 minutes?! FPoS.
Yup - it's even worse when transferring a big zip file over a network... I disable Windows zip handling, 'cause it sucks.
Greg Utas wrote: - The next instruction is “Add the bin directory to your path”. Presumably “bin directory” refers to an extracted directory with executables. OK, I find it. But I have no idea what “your path” refers to. My project folder, the one that maps to its top-level folder on GitHub? Right now this is where I’m stuck.
Open up a command prompt and use the following command, replacing the bit in angle brackets with the path of Coverity's bin folder on your machine:
SET PATH=<path to Coverity's bin folder>%PATH%
Greg Utas wrote: - Next, I’d have to figure out how to configure the tool for Microsoft’s C++ compiler using some command line stuff. The download page says to refer to coverity build tool/docs/en/help/cov-configure.txt for help. But there's no sign of a /docs folder in the extracted folder or its subfolders.
You don't need to do this step - it already knows how to cope with Visual C++.
Greg Utas wrote: - Finally, I’d have to do a build using command line stuff that I’ve never had to bother with, because Visual Studio takes care of it all when you click on “Build Solution”.
- Open a Visual Studio command-line using the Start Menu (Start -> Visual Studio 2017 -> Developer Command Prompt for VS 2017, as in this screenshot).
- Change directory to the one containing your solution file.
- Use 'msbuild' to build your solution, like so:
MSBuild.exe <solution-file> -t:Build -p:Configuration=Debug -p:Platform=Win32 -m
Obviously, change 'Debug' to 'Release' or 'Win32' to 'x64' to build a different configuration if you need to.
HTH!
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
